By Alan
Caruba
The
President of the United States is routinely referred to as the most powerful
man on the Earth. There is a greater power and it is the changing
characteristics of population, something that occurs constantly here and around
the world.
Laws are
powerless against it and, in particular, laws that were passed some eighty to
fifty years ago with the best of intentions. I refer, in particular, to Social
Security, Medicare and Medicaid. No one anticipated that Americans would
routinely live to their current life expectancy of 78 years, nor that advances
in medicine and healthcare would extend their lives into their late 80’s and
their 90’s.
Nor could
laws anticipate American lifestyles that went from a time when older citizens
often lived with and were cared for by their children to a time when retirement
communities exist along with facilities that provide care for the elderly
afflicted with the illness associated with aging such as the explosion of Alzheimer’s
disease. In the 1930s, no one anticipated the emancipation of women and their
empowerment in the workplace.
Jonathan Last is a senior writer at
the Weekly Standard and the author of a new book, “What to Expect When No
One’s Expecting: American’s Coming Demographic Disaster.” The Wall Street
Journal recently published an article by Last, “America’s Baby Bust.”
Demographics,
birth rates, aging, and the movement of populations such as the many Hispanics
that crossed our southern border to seek jobs and enjoy the benefits America
extends through programs that aid the poor. For the second time since 1986,
Congress is attempting to grapple with millions of illegal aliens and their
children who call America home.
While the
immigration debate rages, Last notes that it has been the immigration of
Hispanics that has kept the U.S. from becoming as stagnant as Japan. “While the
nation as a whole has a fertility rate of 1.93, the Hispanic-American fertility
rate is 2.35.” Even that is beginning to decline.
“Forget
the debt ceiling, Forget the fiscal cliff, the sequestration cliff and the
entitlement cliff. These are just symptoms. What America really faces is a
demographic cliff: The root cause of most of our problems is our declining
fertility rate.”
“The fertility
rate is the number of children an average woman bears over the course of her
life. The replacement rate is 2.1. If the average woman has more children than
that, the population grows. Fewer, and it contracts. Today, America’s total
fertility rate is 1.93, according to the latest figures from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention; it hasn’t been above the replacement rate in a
sustained way since the early 1970s.”
The only
blip in our fertility rate followed the end of WWII and that cohort became
known as the “baby boomers.” They are now retiring in large numbers daily. That
is putting a strain on the Social Security and Medicare programs.
In the
“good old days” women were, for the most part, homemakers caring for their
families, but not part of the job market. Another factor after WWII was the
belief that everyone had to have a college degree to have upward mobility.
“Women,” notes Last, “began attending college in equal (and then ever greater)
numbers than men.”
This
caused young people of both sexes to put off marriage and, as the economy
encountered recessions and the present fiscal uncertainties, the cost of
college has skyrocketed, and graduation now means a huge debt for many of them
before they even enter the job market.
The decrease
in the fertility rate is not just an American problem. It is global and we are
seeing this in Europe where socialism has been practiced even more briskly than
here. As Last points out, “97% of the world’s population now lives in countries
where the fertility rate is falling.” It translates into lost productivity and
pressures on governments that attempt to prop up and maintain their economies
through excessive borrowing. The U.S. government borrows about 40 cents of
every dollar it spends.
So the President
and Congress face the problem of an aging population, too few new babies being
born, and economic policies—increased taxation—that work against the decision
to have children. Children are expensive. The “perverse effect of putting
government in the business of eldercare has been to reduce the incentives to
have children…”
To that we
can add putting government in charge of healthcare, education, housing, and
energy. It has a track record of ruining these sectors that would thrive if
they were returned to the free and open marketplace. One can search the
Constitution long and hard to find a justification for government intervention
or control and plenty of history to demonstrate they do better when addressed
at the state and local level.
“In the
face of this decline,” says Last, “the only thing that will preserve America’s
place in the world is if all Americans—Democrats, Republicans, Hispanics,
blacks, Jews, Christians and atheists—decide to have babies.”
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
10 comments:
Probably not going to happen in this age of birth control.
But we don't have the money for that either, do we?
Well so much for that stupid Leftist theory from the 1970s that overpopulation would destroy civilization!
Alan, I agree with Lime Lite. Joel C. Rosenberg confirms in his latest book 'Implosion' this same number. This alone amounts to almost 3800 babies per day!
And remember, our caring president voted not once, not twice but three times that if a baby is born alive during a late term abortion, that baby should be allowed to die.
Oh, he cares all right!
Hey Alan,
Great post. I heard an interview with Mr. Last and am aware of the devastation that low birth rates have caused in Europe. I have placed a short-cut to your blog on my desktop, and am glad I found it. Read mine if you have a chance http://smallcraftadvisorychronicles.blogspot.com/
Alan,
Very good post. I heard an interview with Mr. Last and am aware of the devastation that low birth ratesd have cause in Euorpe. I am glad I found your blog and will keep reading it. Check out http://smallcraftadvisorychronicles.blogspot.com/
Thank you, Damon. Keep on blogging!
Well, I must add that IMO there are already TOO MANY people on this planet. The technological age that began not that many years ago doesn't need MORE people. We're already fouling the planet, the water, the wildlife, the cities, the air, the oceans. Please, not enough people is NOT a 'solution' to much of ANYthing.
@Glendamay: I am inclined to agree. In the past wars, famines, and disease kept populations in check, but as the article notes, 97% are not at a replacement rate of fertility and, as people gain more wealth, etc, they tend to have less children. Thus, natural and other factors will likely reduce the current 7 billion to considerably less in the decades and centuries ahead.
Not only that, but as the population ages and there are fewer young people, social safety net programs become less and less funded. Then the Greece scenario, where there are more people on the system than paying into it, will cause a collapse in our country.
Post a Comment