Friday, January 30, 2015
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Obama ad Nauseum
By Alan
Caruba
I made a
promise to myself that I would not write about President Obama’s State of the
Union speech because that would require me to watch him deliver it. Like many
others I can barely watch him under any circumstance because, to my mind, that
means having to watch a psychopathic liar. The problem with that is that he is
the President for two more years.
And then I
read an article on Politico.com, “Republicans outfox Democrats on climate votes” subtitled “The GOP accepts the notion of climate change, but not in the
way the Democrats wanted them to.”
In a
rational world, politicians voting on whether the climate changes or not is an
absurdity. Of course the climate changes. It always has and always will. But
when Democrats use the term “climate change” they really mean “global warming.”
And global warming has been the greatest hoax of the modern era, getting its
start in the late 1980s and becoming a huge academic industry generated by the
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Global
warming put billions in the pockets of “scientists”, universities, and any
think tank that would lie about it, telling the nation and the world that
carbon dioxide, a gas that is barely 0.04% of the Earth’s atmosphere was
warming it when, in fact, the Earth stopped warming some 19 years ago at the
same time the Sun entered a natural cycle of lower solar radiation.
Few of
these “scientists” bothered to tell the public that, without carbon dioxide, we
and all other life on Earth would die as it is critical to the growth of all
vegetation. The fact that the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has
actually been increasing at the same time the Earth has been cooling is proof
enough that all the warming claims were and are pure hogwash.
It turns out that all the computer
models that they and others have generated to predict a catastrophic global
warming have been wrong, wrong, and wrong.
Obama
didn’t have a word to say about al Qaeda and the other Islamic fascists eager
to destroy modernity and drag the world back to the Dark Age, but he did lie
about 2014 as “the planet’s warmest year on record.”
That lie
was initially put out by NASA and National Oceanic and the Atmospheric
Administration, (NOAA) two government agencies that shortly thereafter admitted
that they might be wrong, seeing that their assertion of the 0.02 degree
Celsius increase wasn’t even outside their own margin of error. They could have
taken a look at their own satellite data and saved themselves from looking like
idiots.
Obama
said, “I’ve heard some folks try to dodge the evidence by saying they’re not
scientists; that we don’t have enough information to act. Well, I’m not a
scientist, either. But you know what—I know a lot of really good scientists at
NASA and NOAA, and at our major universities. The best scientists in the world
are all tell us that our activities are changing the climate, and if we do not
act forcefully, we’ll continue to see rising oceans, long, hotter heat waves,
dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger great
migration, conflict, and hunger around the globe.”
This is
lying on a galactic scale. The United States doesn’t need to do a single thing
to reduce “greenhouse gas emissions”, nor should it bother to do so. Obama’s
claims of catastrophic change bears no relationship to the fact that in recent
years the planet has had a record low in the numbers of tornadoes and
hurricanes, and a record gain in Arctic and Antarctic ice. There has been no change
of any significance in the sea levels. Those who study such things note that
“Until about 7,000 years ago the rate of rise was about 100 mm/decade. Since
then rate of rise has averaged 10 mm/decade.” That’s “mm” as in millimeters.
In late
December, the world’s second largest reinsurer, Swiss Re, reported on the
losses from natural events in 2014 and, despite predictions that climate change
would cause more frequent natural catastrophes due to man-made worsening of the
climate, it saw “markedly less damage claims than in previous years” and far
less loss of lives.” In terms of the dollars it cost the insurance industry,
Swiss Re estimated that costs insurers covered were USD $113 billion in 2014,
down from USD $135 billion in 2013. Losses were down 24% from 2013.
That, of
course, doesn’t matter to Obama. It should, however, matter to the rest of us
because the Environmental Protection Agency has been using those computer
models and abjectly phony “science” to wage Obama’s war on the nation’s
providers of the energy on which we all depend. From coal-fired plants to
drilling for oil and natural gas, anything that might provide energy is under
attack by the EPA.
As Katie
Tubb, a research assistant for the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy
Studies at The Heritage Foundation, responded to Obama’s claim saying that “The
EPA’s proposed regulations would have almost zero impact on global
temperatures, but will certainly impact Americans now and for future
generations.”
So, when
you read about a bunch of U.S. Senators, only one of whom, Oklahoma’s Sen.
James Inhofe (R) has a grasp of the real science, spent time voting back and
forth over amendments and their language regarding the climate, you were in
fact really reading about the debate leading up to the passage of the bill that
would remove Obama’s authority to prevent the construction of the Keystone XL
pipeline.
Between a
President who lies about global warming and climate change, and a Congress
composed mostly of lawyers who are clueless about the actual science, the best
we can hope for is a Republican Party determined to rein in the EPA and other
government agencies; the reason they were voted into office.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
An Auschwitz Anniversary
By Alan
Caruba
There was
some serious irony when U.S. Secretary of Treasury Jack Lew gathered together
with French President Francois Hollande and a Russian delegation led by Sergei
Ivanov, Putin’s chief of staff, along with leaders from Germany and Austria to
participate in the January 27 ceremony commemorating the liberation of
Auschwitz in 1945 by Russian troops.
I suspect
that an entire generation or two born after that year, 70 years ago, may have
little or no knowledge of what Auschwitz was. It was a Nazi death camp located
in Oswiecim, Poland. Its full name was Auschwitz-Birkenau and it is estimated
that one million people, mostly Jews, were killed there.
I say
“irony” because Auschwitz-Birkenau was part of a system of six Nazi death camps
that included Belzac, Chelmo, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka. Each camp was
filled with the victims of a widespread anti-Semitism that had existed in
Europe for two thousand years, so it was not difficult for the Germans to turn
a blind eye or the French and others to provide assistance in rounding up their
Jews.
The camps
engaged in large scale murder to fulfil Adolf Hitler’s intention to exterminate
every Jew in Europe. In 1933 there had been nine million living in 21 nations
that would be occupied during World War II. By 1945, two out of every three
European Jews had been killed.
In
addition to the Jews, an estimated five million others deemed enemies of the
state for political or other reasons such as being Communists, trade unionists,
gypsies or homosexuals also died in the camps.
What is rarely
acknowledged is that the Europeans of that era were largely educated, had a
rich culture of music, literature, and drama, and many were church-goers. In
short, you would not have been able to tell them apart from the Europeans of
today.
The Nazis
wrote the book on the use of terrorism to facilitate their barbaric, murderous
theology of death. The Muslims that have moved to Europe have adapted it to
their own ends, seeking like the Nazis to become globally dominant. They don’t
have death camps—yet—but the widespread and constant slaughter in which they are engaged has a similar
feel to it.
In the
1930s those European Jews had few places to which to flee. They were not even
that welcome in America where anti-Semitism was widespread. Those that could
did emigrate and, again there is irony because several of the German physicists
that came to the U.S. were instrumental in the creation of the atomic bomb that
ended World War II while others played roles in the Nazi’s defeat during the
war. One such emigrant, Albert Einstein, was the first to suggest the creation
of the weapon to Franklin Roosevelt.
In
response to European anti-Semitism, a movement called Zionism had begun before
World War II with the intention of reestablishing Israel as a Jewish state
where Jews could be safe. The movement was founded by Theodor Herzl in 1896.
Here again there is irony because the movement was dominated by secular Jews
who were not motivated by Jewish history or the Torah. What they wanted was to
be free of the oppressive antipathy of the nations in which they lived. What
they were seeking was emancipation.
By the
time World War II occurred they were a force to be recognized in Israel, known
at the time as the Palestinian Mandate and run by the British who, as often as
not, shared the anti-Semitism that had given life to the Zionist movement. It
would take the Holocaust to accelerate the movement of Europe’s surviving Jews
to Israel which in 1948 declared its sovereignty and was immediately attacked
by the Muslim nations surrounding it.
Fast
forward to our times and the Jews of Israel as well as those around the world
know one truth. If Iran is permitted to reach a point where it can create its
own nuclear weapons and put them on their missiles, Israel will only be minutes
away from an extermination that the Iranian leadership and the other Muslim
nations of the Middle East have openly called for since Israel came into being
and the Islamic Revolution took control of Iran in 1979.
This time,
however, the same nuclear weapons that would destroy Israel would also be
turned on the United States because the shouts of “Death to America. Death to
Israel” are a part of the daily lives of the Iranians, as well as others in the
region.
What makes
these days so dangerous is that the United States of America is engaged in
negotiations with an Iran that has never made a secret of their intention to be
a nuclear-armed nation. What makes these days so dangerous is that the
President of the United States has barely hidden his own anti-Semitism and
animus toward Israel.
One can
only pray that seventy years hence some other writer will not be commenting on
the second great annihilation of the Jews, literally within the lifetime of
people who were alive during the first one. I am one of those people and
Auschwitz is not some place that existed a long time ago. It was yesterday.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
The Blizzard That Wasn't
By Alan
Caruba
Dateline:
January 27, 2015 - 3 to 4 AM, New York City and Tri-State area.
There was
no climate change where I live in a suburb of Newark, N.J. if by “climate
change” you meant a dramatic blizzard with high winds and several feet of snow.
It’s winter and you get the occasional, rare blizzard every few years, but more
often you get snowstorms. That’s not “change” by any definition.
Listening
to WABC radio follow events with callers from around the Tri-State area calling
in with far more accurate reports than the meteorologists was an education in
the way those trained in meteorology and the rest of us have been conditioned
to believe that something is happening to planet Earth that, quite simply, is
not happening.
The
meteorologists spent their time trying to figure out the difference between a
European computer model and one generated here in the U.S. The former predicted
far worse conditions. The latter fell victim, along with the rest of us, to the
mindset that the conditions the computers were interpreting did not reflect
what was actually happening.
At this
early morning hour, it is clear that Long Island, parts of Connecticut, and
generally along the coastlines, there has been a heavier snowfall. A few miles
inland however it is a far different story. Callers who had been out in the
midst of the storm described light, powdery snow and perhaps two to four inches
at most.
Why, they
asked, did the Governors of New York and New Jersey, along with the Mayor of
New York City close down the metropolitan area? They speculated on the millions
of lost income for everyone involved in a storm that was not posing a
significant traffic or other problems, but who had seen businesses, schools,
bus lines, and other public facilities shut down. When a significantly
incorrect weather prediction does that, it demonstrates how important it is to
correctly interpret the data being provided by the satellites—the best source.
When,
earlier in January, NOAA and NASA reported that 2014 had been "the warmest year"
it should have raised far more questions and media coverage given the sheer
absurdity of such a report. Remember, though, these are two federal government
agencies we expect to get it right. They didn’t just get it wrong, skeptical
scientists were quick to note how they had deliberately distorted the data on which
they based the claim.
That is the
heart of the issue surrounding the endless claims of “global warming” or
“climate change.” The planet has not
been warming for 19 years at this point because the sun has been in a perfectly
natural cycle of low radiation.
Centuries ago, it was noticed that when there
are few sunspots, magnetic storms, the Earth got colder. Thus, “climate change”
is not an unusual event, but rather a reflection of the well-known cycles of
warmth or cold that the planet has passed through for billions of years.
At this
writing it is too early in the morning hours to know what the rest of the East
Coast looks like, but the indications are that, as one moves westward the
“blizzard” has been far less than the one predicted and will likely be
downgraded to a standard winter snowstorm.
That’s the
good news. The bad news was the over-reaction of meteorologists and
politicians. No doubt they wanted to be “safe than sorry” but they
inadvertently taught us all a lesson about the way environmental organizations
and a government led by a President telling us that “climate change” is the
most dangerous challenge facing us have been deliberately lying about the true
meteorological record in order to drag us all back to a time in which we burned
wood for heat and rode horses for transportation.
The Greens don’t like humans much
and that is why they have been lying about “man-made” climate change when the
climate has nothing to do with human activities.
Listen to
the skeptics, often maliciously called “deniers”, when they tell you the truth
about the meteorological science that has been deliberately distorted since the
United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in
1988. It has been lying to us ever since.
Depending
on where you live in the area in which the snow fell and the winds blew, trust
your eyes. Trust your commonsense. Be more skeptical because the blizzard that
wasn’t is not a lesson you want to forget anytime soon.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Monday, January 26, 2015
Obama Disses Alaska
Alaska's "pristine" wildlife refuge |
By Alan Caruba
Fifty
million Americans who live in the northeast will experience what is predicted
to be a historic blizzard from Monday evening through Tuesday. Cities and towns will virtually or literally close down. People will be
told to stay indoors for their safety and to facilitate the crews that will
labor to clear the roads of snow.
In other
words, welcome to Alaska, a place that is plenty cold most of the year and
which is no stranger to snow and ice.
Alaska,
however, has something that the whole world considers very valuable; oil and natural
gas. Lots of it. In 1980 a U.S. Geological Survey estimated that the Coastal
Plain could contain up to 17 billion barrels of oil and 34 trillion cubic feet
of natural gas.
In 1987,
the U.S Department of Interior confirmed the earlier estimate, saying that “in
place resources” ranged from 4.8 billion to 29.4 billion barrels of oil.
Recoverable oil estimates ranged from 600 million barrels at the low end to 9.2
billion barrels at the high end.
A nation
with an $18 trillion debt might be expected to want to take advantage of this
source of revenue, but no, not if that debt was driven up by the idiotic
policies of President Barack Obama and not if it could be reduced by the same
energy industry that has tapped similar oil and natural gas reserves in the lower 48 states by
drilling on private, not public lands.
Instead,
on Sunday President Obama referred to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
(ANWR) as “an incredible place—pristine, undisturbed. It supports caribou and
polar bears” and other species and, guess what, tapping its vast oil and
natural gas reserves would not interfere in any way with those species despite
the whopping lie that “it’s very fragile.”
At Obama’s
direction, the Interior Department announced it was proposing to preserve as
wilderness nearly 13 million acres of land in ANWR’s 19.8 million-acre area. That
would include 1.5 million acres of coastal plains that Wall Street Journal
reported to be “believed to have rich oil and natural gas reserves.”
Not a
whole lot of people choose ANWR as a place to vacation. It is a harsh, though
often beautiful, area that only the most experienced visitor might want
to spend some time. I would want to make every environmentalist who thinks any
drilling would harm the area have to take up residence in its “pristine”
wilderness to confirm that idiotic notion.
They would
find plenty of caribou, polar bears and other species hanging out amidst the
oil and gas rigs, and along the pipe line. The Central Arctic Caribou Herd that
migrates through the Prudhoe Bay oil field, just next to ANWR has increased
from 5,000 animals in the 1970s to more than 50,000 today. There is no evidence
than any of the animal species have experienced any decline.
The
Coastal Plain lies between known major discovery areas and the Prudhoe Bay,
Lisburne, Endicott, Milne Point and Kuparuk oil fields are currently in
production In 1996, the North Slope oil fields produced about 1.5 million
barrels of oil per day or approximately 25% of the U.S. domestic production.
Alaska is permitted to export its oil because of its high levels of
productivity.
So why has
Obama’s Department of the Interior decided it wants to shut off energy
exploration and extraction in a whopping 13-million acres of what is already designated
as a wildlife refuge and along its coastlines on the Beaufort and Chukchi seas? The
answer is consistent with Obama’s six years of policies to deny Americans the
benefits of the nation's vast energy reserves, whether it is the coal that has
previously provided 50% of our electrical energy—now down by 10%--or access to
reserves of oil and natural gas that would make our nation energy independent
as well as a major exporter.
The good
news is that only Congress has the authority to declare an area as wilderness.
It has debated the issue for more than 30 years and in 12 votes in the House
and 3 votes in the Senate it has passed legislation supporting development and
opposing the wilderness designation.
And guess
who is the new chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee?
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaskan Republican. She also heads up the
appropriations subcommittee responsible for funding the Interior Department!
This
latest Obama ANWR gambit is going to go nowhere. It does, however, offer the
Republican Congress an opportunity to demonstrate its pro-energy credentials.
“I cannot
understand why this administration is willing to negotiate with Iran, but not
Alaska,” said Sen. Murkowski when informed of Obama’s latest attack.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Sunday, January 25, 2015
ObamaCare Must Go!
By Alan
Caruba
Can anyone
remember how awful the U.S. healthcare free market system was that it needed to
be replaced by the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as ObamaCare? Can’t remember? That’s because it was ranked
one of the best of the world and represented 17.9% of the nation’s economy in
2014. That’s down from the 20% it
represented in 2009 when ObamaCare was foisted on Americans.
One of the
best ways to follow the ObamaCare story is via Health Care News, a monthly newspaper published by The Heartland
Institute. The January issue begins with an article by Sean Parnell, the
managing editor, reporting that ObamaCare enrollment is overstated by 400,000.
“The U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) once again lowered its estimate
of the number of Americans enrolled in health plans through government
exchanges in 2014. The 6.7 million enrollees who remain are far lower than the
eight million touted in May at the end of the last open-enrollment period.”
ObamaCare
has been a lie from the moment it was introduced for a vote, all 2,700 pages of
it, to the present day. Everything President Obama said about it was a lie. As
to its present enrollments, they keep dropping because some 900,000 who did
sign up did not make the first premium payment or later stopped paying.
Michael
Cannon, director of health policy studies as the Cato Institute, said the
dropout rate is a troubling trend. “It means that potentially hundreds of
thousands of Exchange enrollees are realizing they are better off waiting until
they get sick to purchase coverage. If enough people come to that conclusion,
the exchanges collapse.”
Elsewhere
in this month’s edition, there is an article, “States Struggle to Fund
Exchanges”, that reports on the difficulties that “states are experiencing difficulty
in paying the ongoing costs of the exchanges, especially small states. “’The
feds are asking us to do their jobs for them. We get saddled with the operating
costs,’ said Edmund Haislmaier, senior research fellow for health care policy
studies at The Heritage Foundation.” Some are imposing a two percent tax on the
insurance companies which, of course, gets passed along to the consumer. Even
so, the exchanges are not generating enough income to be maintained.
Why would
anyone want ObamaCare insurance when its rates keep rising dramatically? In
Nebraska the rates have nearly doubled and another article notes that “A 2014
study finds large numbers of doctors are declining to participate in health
plans offered through exchanges under the Affordable Care Act, raising
questions about whether people buying insurance through exchanges will be able
to access health care in a timely manner.” One reason physicians gave was that
they would have to hire additional staff “just to manage the insurance verification
process.”
Dr. Kris
Held, a Texas eye surgeon, said ObamaCare “fails to provide affordable health
insurance and fails to provide access to actual medical care to more people,
but succeeds in compounding existing health care costs and accessibility problems
and creating new ones.”
Health Care News reports what few other news outlets
have noted. “In Section 227 of the recently enacted ‘Cromnibus’ spending
measure, Congress added critical but little-noticed language that prohibits the
use of funds appropriated to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to
pay for insurance company bailouts.” William Todd, an Ohio attorney, further
noted that “Congress did not appropriate any separate funding for ‘bailouts.’”
Todd predicted that “some insurers are likely to raise premiums to avoid
losses, or they will simply stop offering policies on the exchanges
altogether.”
The
picture of ObamaCare failure emerging from these excerpts is a very true one.
Its momentum, in fact, is gaining.
In
mid-December, the Wall Street Journal opined that “With the Supreme Court due
to rule on a major ObamaCare legal challenge by next summer, thoughts in
Washington are turning to the practical and political response. If the Court
does strike down insurance subsidies, the question for Republicans running
Congress is whether they will try to fix the problems Democrats created, or
merely allow ObamaCare damage to grow.”
“King v.
Burwell will be heard in March with a ruling likely in June. “Of the 5.4
million consumers on federal exchanges, some 87% drew subsidies in 2014,
according to a Rand Corporation analysis.”
The Wall
Street Journal recommended that “The immediate Republican goal should be to
make insurance cheaper so people need less of a subsidy to obtain insurance.
This means deregulating the exchanges, plank by plank. Devolve to states their
traditional insurance oversight role, and allow them to enter into cross-border
compacts to increase choice and competition. Allow insurers to sell any
configuration of benefits to anyone, anywhere, and the private market will
gradually heal.”
Or, to put
it another way, eliminate ObamaCare entirely and return to the healthcare
insurance system that had served Americans well until the White House decided
that socialism was superior to capitalism.
The problem with the Affordable Care Act is that the cost of the insurance sold under the Act is not affordable and ObamaCare is actually causing hospitals and clinics to close their doors, thus reducing healthcare services for those who need them.
The problem with the Affordable Care Act is that the cost of the insurance sold under the Act is not affordable and ObamaCare is actually causing hospitals and clinics to close their doors, thus reducing healthcare services for those who need them.
ObamaCare
must go. If the Republicans in Congress did nothing more than repeal ObamaCare,
the outcome of the 2016 election would be a predictable win no matter who their
candidate will be. If not repeal, some separate actions must be taken such as
eliminating the tax on medical instruments.
If the
Republican Congress fails to take swift and deliberate action on ObamaCare
between now and the 2016 elections, they will have defeated themselves.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Friday, January 23, 2015
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Supreme Court Malfeasance
Question asked at a gay protest event |
By Alan
Caruba
Over the
course of its history the Supreme Court has made some very bad decisions and
the decision to declare abortion legal ranks high among them. On January 22,
1973, in Roe v. Wade the Court
interpreted the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to extend a
right of privacy to a woman’s decision to have an abortion prior to the third
trimester of pregnancy.
There have
been 57.5 million abortions since 1973—42 years—when the decision became the
law of the land. In all the wars America has fought, going back to the
Revolution, the total of those killed in combat as of September 2014 was 1,343,812.
The casualties
of the Supreme Court’s decision about unborn Americans reveal the wide gap between
the morality, as opposed to the legality, of the Court’s decision.
Now the
Court has taken on cases that will determine the legality of same-sex marriage
and here again the morality of sanctioning this definition of marriage is a
world apart from the morality of marriage occurring exclusively between a man
and woman as has been the norm since the earliest history of mankind.
Marriage
has always been understood as the critical cornerstone of a healthy functioning
society. It has always been understood that children raised by a mother and
father are a benefit to society while those deprived of this union are
frequently subject to problems of one sort or another.
In the
United States, however, many of the traditional morals that served the interest
of society have been abandoned since around the middle of the last century. The
gap between liberals and conservatives has widened.
One result
was recently announced in a Pew Research Center study that found that less than half of all American children
now live in a two-parent household with two married heterosexual parents who
are, in fact, their own parents.
The Daily Caller reported that “In addition, fully 41% of all American babies are
currently born out of wedlock. By way of comparison, in 1960 73% of all
American children” lived in a traditional married household.
An earlier
Pew Research Center study, announced in August 2013, depicted mothers as the
main provider in 40% of American households with children. Jennifer Marshall,
Director of the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at the Heritage
Foundation, noted that 25% of “households with children under 18 are supported
by a single mother.” Their median income was $23,000 and 44% are never-married
moms. “More than a third of these single mothers aren’t working at all—meaning
they are much more likely to depend on government welfare.”
What all
these statistics add up to is a nation in which traditional marriage is under
attack while living together unmarried or having children as a single mother
have become accepted at an alternative lifestyle.
Now we are
being told that America should abandon the concept of legal citizenship and
accord it to anyone who crosses the border. This isn’t how an orderly society
or sovereign state is defined. It is a definition of anarchy.
As the
Supreme Court gets ready to hear the same-sex marriage case, the rest of us are
wondering why a tiny minority of society should be granted a right that no
society in history has ever imparted.
How small
is it? In September 2014 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
released a report that men who have sex with men (gay and bisexual) comprise
about 2% of the U.S. population. When you add in lesbians the number moves up
to about 3%.
The CDC
tracks such things because “In 2010, among persons newly infected with HIV, 63%
were men have sex with men (MSM) and among persons living with HIV, 52% were MSM.”
According to the CDC it is contracted primarily through anal sex. Despite
federal spending to combat AIDS, between 2008 and 2010 “new infections
increased 22% among young (aged 13-24) gay and bisexual men and 13% among gay
and bisexual men overall” regardless of age.
So the
nation has been experiencing a holocaust of murdered fetuses thanks to the
Supreme Court’s ruling and now we are supposed to abandon the ancient
definition of marriage to accommodate a tiny minority of those who engage in
sex with the same gender. If justification for that can be found in the
Constitution, then it can be interpreted in any manner to degrade our society
and the nation.
Same-sex
marriage is an issue that President Obama said was “America at its best” in his
State of the Union speech. Seven years earlier, campaigning to become
President, he said that marriage was “a sacred union” and was “between a man
and a woman.”
I don’t
care that a number of states have already extended a legal status to same-sex
marriage. I don’t care that it applies to a very small number of Americans.
They can have “civil unions” that resolve any legal issues, but “marriage”? No.
Just as I
say no to those who want to strip the practice of religion from any public
ceremony or remove the saying of prayer in our schools, I will say no to those
who want to remove the moral pillars that have served our society and all societies
over the millennia.
We can
only hope that enough of the current Supreme Court justices feel that way too.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Why Isn't It Treason?
Yemini terrorists released from Gitmo |
By Alan Caruba
“Treason
against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or
in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” – Article Three,
Section Three, U.S. Constitution.
Given the
fact that one of the suspects, Said Kouachi, in the Paris killings had traveled
to Yemen in 2011 and that Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula has claimed
responsibility for the killings, does it strike anyone as strange that Obama set free five Yemeni detainees out of Guantanomo Bay? Four were sent to Oman, a
nation that neighbors Yemen. A fifth was transferred to Estonia. It was the
first time either nation had accepted Gitmo prisoners for resettlement.
Does
anyone think that the five Afghan Taliban leaders Obama set free last year are
still in Qatar? Among the things Obama will be remembered for will be his
promise to close Gitmo and these releases of U.S. enemies.
Since when
is freeing Islamic terrorists to return to the battlefield not giving aid and
comfort to the enemy? Well, it is not if you are the President of the United
States because, believe it or not, what he did was entirely within his legal
authority.
Most
dramatic was Obama’s decision not to join the forty other world leaders in
Paris to demonstrate a common opposition to Islamic terrorism. Indeed, he has
denied the use of any reference to Islamic terrorism by government
spokespersons or in government documents. To this day, the Fort Hood killings
are still referred to as “workplace violence” despite the fact that the
perpetrator was shouting “Allah akbar” as he killed his victims.
How stupid
is it to continue to ignore the evidence that we have a President who is more
inclined to side with our Islamic enemies than with Americans?
He
withdrew our troops from Iraq, setting up the creation of the Islamic State
(ISIS) to fill the vacuum that was created. He has officially declared an end
to the American role in fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan. Yes, he has
authorized drone killing of al Qaeda leaders and bombing of the ISIS troops,
but neither has demonstrated any significant reduction in terrorism.
Then there
is Obama’s “war on coal” which has resulted in a torrent of Environmental
Protection Agency regulations and actions that between 2012 and 2020 will bring
about the loss of 60 gigawatts of electricity generated by coal-fired plants
around the nation. Replacing that lost production is not going to occur
overnight. At this point, according to the Associated Press, more than 32
mostly coal-fired plants have closed or are in the process. “Another 36 plants
could be forced to shut down as the result of new EPA rules regulating air
pollution.”
In a
response to the State of the Union speech, Mike Duncan, president of the
American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, said, “President Obama failed to
offer answers about the calamitous consequences of his environmental
regulations. Rather than seek a commonsense energy plan for America, President
Obama bypassed Congress and is forging ahead with his climate crusade at the
expense of the nation’s economic security.”
If a
foreign nation had invaded the United States and began closing down the plants
on which vast areas of the nation depend for electricity, wouldn’t we consider
that an act of war? What is the
difference if it results from the actions of the U.S. President? Moreover,
these closures are totally unnecessary because they are based on false
“science” regarding so-called greenhouse gas emissions. Is the planet warming?
No. It has been cooling for 19 years.
I am not a
lawyer or authority on the Constitution, but it is hard not to consider that
Obama’s long record of lying to Americans doesn’t qualify him, if not for treason
as it is defined, at least for fraud. The way ObamaCare was sold to the public
is a classic example and, as it turns out, Jonathan Gruber, one of its
architects and advisors to Obama, made it quite clear that deception was the
key to its passage, referring to voters as “stupid.”
The 2014
elections demonstrated that Obama’s policies were firmly rejected by the voters
as power in both the Senate and House was turned over to the Republican Party,
but he is giving no evidence of moderating the arrogance that has distinguished
his term in office to date.
On Tuesday,
January 20, the nation was two years from the day in 2017 that Obama’s second
and final term ends and a new President takes power. We need to make sure we
elect a patriotic, God-fearing man to begin the process of reversing and ending
the damage Obama has done thus far.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Obama Has Two More Years Left to Destroy the U.S.
By Alan Caruba
As 2015
began the Journal Editorial Report on Fox News was devoted to having its
reporters, some of the best there are, speculate on what 2015 holds in terms of
who might run for president and what the economy might be. The key word here is
“speculate” because even experts know that it is unanticipated events that
determine the future and the future is often all about unanticipated events.
How
different would the world have been if John F. Kennedy had not been
assassinated? One can reasonably assume there would not have been the long war
in Vietnam because he wanted no part of the conflict there. Few would have
predicted that an unknown Governor from Arkansas would emerge to become
President as Bill Clinton did. Who would believe we are talking about his wife running for President? That is
so bizarre it is mind-boggling.
Most
certainly, few would have predicted that an unknown first term Senator from
Illinois, Barack Hussein Obama, would push aside Hillary Clinton to become the
first black American to be nominated for President and to win in 2008. Despite
the takeover of the nation’s healthcare system with a series of boldfaced lies,
he still won a second term.
Obama now
has two more years in which to try to destroy the U.S. economy; particularly
its manufacturing and energy sectors. The extent to which he is putting in
place the means to do that still remains largely unreported or under-reported
in terms of the threat it represents.
The
vehicle for the nation’s destruction is the greatest hoax of the modern era,
the claim that global warming must be avoided by reducing “greenhouse gas”
emissions. A President who lied to Americans about the Affordable Care Act, telling them they could keep their insurance plans, their doctors, and not have to pay more is surely not going to tell Americans that the planet is now into its 19th year of a cooling cycle with no warming in sight.
To raise
the ante of the planetary threat hoax, he has added “climate change” when one
would assume even the simple-minded would know humans have nothing to do with
the Earth’s climate, nor the ability to initiate or stop any change.
In 2015,
the White House is launching a vast propaganda campaign through the many
elements of the federal government to reach into the nation’s schools with the
climate lies and through other agencies to spread them.
In
particular, Obama has been striving to utilize the Environmental Protection
Agency to subvert existing environmental laws and, indeed, the Constitution
unless Congress or the courts stop an attack that will greatly weaken the
business, industrial and energy sectors. It will fundamentally put our lives at
risk when there is not enough electricity to power homes and workplaces in various areas of the nation. At the
very least, the cost of electricity will, in the President’s own words,
“skyrocket.”
Why
doesn’t anyone in Congress or the rest of the population wonder why White House
policies are closing coal-fired plants that provided fifty percent of our
electricity when Obama took office and now have been reduced to forty percent? Did
you know that more than 1,200 new coal-fired plants are planned in other
nations with two-thirds of them to be built in India and China? We live in a
nation that has such huge reserves of coal we export it.
The EPA
attack on these plants is so illegal and unethical that one of the nation’s
leading liberal attorneys, Laurence H. Tribe, who began teaching about
environmental law 45 years ago, went on record to declare the EPA’s proposed
Clean Power Plan is unconstitutional.
The plan
is a regulatory proposal to reduce carbon emissions from the nation’s electric
power plants. Tribe pointed out that a two-decade old Supreme Court precedent
forbids the federal government from taking action to commandeer the powers of
state governments by leaving them no choice but to implement it.
“The brute
fact,” said Tribe “is that the Obama administration failed to get climate
legislation through Congress. Yet the EPA is acting as though it has the
legislative authority anyway to re-engineer the nation’s electric generating
system and power grid. It does not.”
As 2014
came to a close, the Obama administration either proposed or imposed more than
1,200 new regulations on the American people.
Alex
Newman, writing in the New American,
calculated they will add “even more to the already crushing $2 trillion per
year cost burden of the federal regulatory machine.” Not surprisingly, “most of
the new regulatory schemes involve energy and the environment—139 during a mere
two-week period in December, to be precise.”
“In all,”
Newman reported, “the Obama administration foisted more than 75,000 pages of
regulations on the United States in 2014, costing over $200 billion, on the low
end, if new proposed rules are taken into account.” Just one, the EPA’s “coal
ash” regulation, “is expected to cost as much as $20 billion, estimates
suggest.”
Then add
to that the EPA’s “ozone rule” that is estimated to cost “as much as $270
billion per year and put millions of American jobs at risk under the guise of
further regulating emissions of the natural gas.” Released the day before
Thanksgiving, “Experts also pointed out that the EPA’s own 2007 studies showed
no adverse health effects from exposure to even high levels of ozone.”
These are
just two examples of the regulatory strangulation of the nation’s economy and
energy infrastructure.
This is
Obama’s agenda for the remaining two years of his second and thankfully last
term in office. Whether you know anything about the science of the climate or
have ever even read the Constitution, the sheer disaster of ObamaCare should
have told you by now that everything Obama has put in motion has had the single
objective of destroying the nation's economy in every possible way.
The voters
have put Republicans in charge of both houses of Congress and their primary
responsibility will be to reverse and repeal the damage of Obama’s first six
years. The courts will play a role, but this is a job for our elected
representatives.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Monday, January 19, 2015
Al Sharpton Seeing Red Over All-White Oscars
By Alan
Caruba
I do not
care who was nominated for the 2015 Oscars and I care even less about what the
Rev. Al Sharpton has to say about the fact that this year no blacks were
nominated in any category.
The Oscars
are about films, not race, but you wouldn’t know that from all the nonsense
about the “all white” nominees this year. Back in 1998 the same thing occurred
and maybe it had something to do with the films that year?
Sharpton
has shown a talent for getting involved in various events over the years claiming
racial connotations; beginning with the lies he told about Tawana Brawley in
the 1980s, alleging she was a victim of rape that led to a defamation suit he
lost in 1998. Flash forward and you have a man whom The New York Times reports
has “more than $4.5 million in current state and federal tax liens against him
and his for-profit businesses.”
This is
the same man who has been rubbing elbows lately with the President of the
United States (!) and hailed as a civil rights icon at a recent fund-raising
event by New York Mayor Bill de Blasio and Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo. Obama hailed
him for his “dedication to the righteous cause of perfecting our union”,
whatever that means. As The Times reported, “Major corporations sponsored the
lavish affair.”
There is
the reek of corruption surrounding Rev. Sharpton that speaks poorly of the high
ranked politicians who lend him credibility and the corporations that help
underwrite his blatant exploitation of racial events such as those in Ferguson,
Missouri. It does not speak well of MSNBC that has provided him with a
television show as a platform devoted to stirring up resentment among blacks.
“The lack
of diversity in today’s Oscar nominations is appalling,” Rev. Sharpton said “and
while it is good that Selma was nominated for ‘Best Picture’, it’s ironic that
they nominated a story about the racial shutout around voting while there is a
racial shutout around the Oscar nominations.”
The Oscars
are not about “diversity.” They are the result of the voting by some 6,000
members of the Motion Picture Academy. The Hollywood Reporter noted that 94%
are white, 77% are male, and 86% are age 50 or older. The Academy, however, has
demonstrated its support for black films and performers dating back to 1939
when Hattie McDaniel won a Supporting Actress Award for her role in ‘Gone with
the Wind.’
The list
of black actors and actresses who have either been nominated or won Oscars is
rather impressive and includes Sidney Pointier, Louis Gosset Jr, Denzel
Washington, Whoopi Goldberg, Halle Berry, and Morgan Freeman among the 44 black
actors nominated. Others include Ethel Waters in 1948, Dorothy Dandridge in
1954, James Earl Jones in 1970, to name just a few.
The attention the Oscars get is based on the films Hollywood produces, many of which are quite forgettable. The award show is one of the most tedious
shows on television bar none. Am I upset because one of my favorite actors and
directors, Clint Eastwood, was left out of the director category? No. Am I
miffed because Jennifer Aniston, another favorite of mine, did not receive an
acting nomination? No. I am a fan, but whether they win a prize
or not is of little importance to me.
I am at the point where every new film seems a re-run of every earlier one I
ever saw. Others are merely cartoonish violence. I am sure some good films are
being made, but I no longer have much interest in films these days.
As for
“Selma”, I remember the actual event and that was dramatic enough. On top of
that, I later personally met Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and had a short chat
with him. He was an extraordinary man. The film received a best picture nomination,
but I am under the impression that it has not drawn much of an audience.
I can only
speak for myself when I say I am deeply offended by the antics of Rev. Sharpton
because he’s unhappy this year’s Oscar nominees are “white.” Last time I checked, not paying your taxes was a crime.
Oh, by the
way, I will not be watching the Oscar awards. Other than the State of the Union speech, it is one of the most boring
annual shows on television.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Sunday, January 18, 2015
NASA Keeps Telling "Warmest" Lies
By Alan
Caruba
On January
16 The New York Times reported the lies NASA keeps telling about global warming
with an article titled “2014 Breaks Heat Record, Challenging Global Warming
Skeptics.” We have reached the point
where neither a famed government agency nor a famed daily newspaper can be
believed simply because both are lying to advance the greatest hoax of the
modern era.
Remember
that 2014 started off with something called a “polar vortex” to describe the
incredibly cold weather being experienced and remember, too, that we were being
told that it was evidence of global warming! That’s how stupid the “Warmists”
who keep saying such things think we are.
The Earth
is in the 19th year of a natural cooling cycle based on the reduced
radiation of the Sun which is in its own natural cycle. It hasn’t been getting
warmer and most people who give it any thought at all know the truth of that.
Enough
people have concluded this that, according to a recent CNN poll, more than
half, 57%, say that global warming is not a global threat. In addition, the
poll revealed that only 50% of Americans believe the alleged global warming is not caused by man-made emissions, while
23% believe it is the result of natural changes, and 26% believe global warming
is not a proven fact.
That’s
progress. No youngster under the age of 19 has ever experienced a single day of
global warming. No computer model that ever predicted it has been accurate.
Neither the Pope nor the President, nor any other world leader who repeats the
global warming claim is correct.
The latest
claim came from NASA and, as I continue to remind readers, it is a government
agency whose budget depends on parroting the lies the President keeps telling
about global warming.
Astrophysicist,
Dr. David Whitehouse, said “The NASA press release is highly misleading…talk of
a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.” He was joined by climatologist Dr. Roy
Spencer who said “We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a
degree.”
Do you
believe that a hundredth of a degree makes a difference? Well, it does if you
are a government agency desperately trying to keep the global warming hoax
alive. Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels asked “Is 58.46 degrees distinguishable
from 58.45 degrees? In a word, NO.”
Marc
Morano, the editor of CFACT’s ClimateDepot.com, said, “There are dueling global
datasets—surface temperature records and satellite records—and they disagree.
The satellites show an 18 year-plus global warming standstill and the satellite
was set up to be ‘more accurate’ than the surface records.” As for the NASA
claim, Morano dismissed it as “simply a political statement not based on
temperature gauges.” Morano, a former member of the staff of the U.S. Senate
Environmental & Public Works Committee, is working on an upcoming
documentary “Climate Hustle.”
How does
this affect you? The lie that carbon dioxide and methane emissions, dubbed
“greenhouse gases”, are causing global warming is the basis for the Obama
administration’s attack on the nation’s energy sector and, in particular, the
provision of electricity by coal-fired plants. In the past six years many of
these plants have been shut down or will be. The result is less electricity and
higher prices for electricity. The other result is an attack on the oil and natural
gas industry that drill to access these resources. There is not a scintilla of truth to justify
what is being done to Americans in the name of global warming.
There is
yet another result and that is the loss of jobs in the energy sector and the
reduction in revenue to the nation and states it represents. The nation’s
economy overall has been in sluggish state which the word “growth” doesn’t even
begin to describe. That hurts everyone.
Most of us
don’t have a lot of time to get up to speed and stay there regarding the facts
surrounding global warming or climate change. An excellent source of
information is the Environment &
Climate News, a monthly publication by The Heartland Institute, a thirty
year old non-profit free market think tank that will sponsor its tenth annual
International Conference on Climate Change in Washington, D.C. in June.
NASA has
been allowed to degrade to the point where the agency that sent men to the Moon
no longer has the capacity to even transport them to the International Space Station
built by the Russians. We have gone from the world’s leader in space
exploration to an agency that has been turned into a propaganda machine
asserting that a hundredth of a degree “proves” that global warming is
happening.
The U.S.
and the rest of the world are setting records, but they are records for how
cold it has become everywhere. There was snow recently in Saudi Arabia from a
storm that swept across Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel,
and Jordan. Does that sound like global warming to you? For an excellent source
of information on the cooling of the planet, visit http://iceagenow.info.
You
have an obligation to yourself, your family, friends and co-workers to not just
know the truth but to denounce entities like NASA, the EPA, and The New York
Times, Time, Newsweek, National Geographic, and others that keep repeating the
lies about global warming.
©
Alan Caruba, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)