tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post2428854815848677949..comments2023-10-27T03:41:13.171-07:00Comments on Warning Signs: It's an Ice Age for SureAlan Carubahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10901162110385985193noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-68776231740331977262015-02-24T08:57:21.741-08:002015-02-24T08:57:21.741-08:00Global warming my butt. Look at all this snow just...Global warming my butt. Look at all this snow just in January and February this year.<br />http://widewaterramblings.phanfare.com/Necromancerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16596027359880539976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-56408731163489295492015-02-24T06:19:38.151-08:002015-02-24T06:19:38.151-08:00Another great read is 'The Whole Story of Clim...Another great read is 'The Whole Story of Climate' by E. Kirsten Peters. She uses her studies of earth sciences to postulate her thesis that our next problem could well be cooling!<br />People like Al Gore use hysteria to glean millions of $ for themselves! In other words, they are snake oil salesmen.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11704235176130183342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-15115800300550798902015-02-24T05:32:49.193-08:002015-02-24T05:32:49.193-08:00The weather, of course, is quite dynamic and subje...The weather, of course, is quite dynamic and subject to change, but the climate which is measured in decades and centuries reveals cycles and the difference between real climatologists and the global warming fakers is the way they interpret or distort the data. The real ones tell the truth.Alan Carubahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10901162110385985193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-18372612171515230362015-02-23T18:07:41.522-08:002015-02-23T18:07:41.522-08:00"Real climatologists, meteorologists, and sci..."Real climatologists, meteorologists, and scientists paying attention to both the past and to present events are forecasting more intense and longer winters—for now a Little Ice Age."<br /><br />We need to keep in mind that these are the same folks who can't tell us whether it's going to rain a week from next Wednesday. Surely, some such have a hidden agenda, while others are more honest; but clearly, they're all just guessing.<br />Gerry Rzeppahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03762693263846082301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-44750326490620239642015-02-23T15:17:50.858-08:002015-02-23T15:17:50.858-08:00My comment above needs a slight edit:
The tempera...My comment above needs a slight edit:<br /><br />The temperature varies as the fourth-root of the incident solar radiation; the percentage variation in temperature is thus one-fourth of the percentage variation in the incident solar. Harry Dale Huffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03210275295826050501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-54076163275458996492015-02-23T15:00:51.557-08:002015-02-23T15:00:51.557-08:00It is not the global climate that is unstable, it ...It is not the global climate that is unstable, it is the debate about it that is loopy (in other words -- incompetent). Fundamentally, basic physics tells us that the percentage variation in the global mean temperature must be the fourth-root of the percentage variation in incident solar power, very closely. The incident solar power, however, varies by only a small amount, typically one-tenth of 1 percent or less, over decades and even over millennia--and this would not be affected by any magnetic reversal, either, that has nothing to do with it, fundamentally. So a 0.1% variation in the incident solar irradiation should provide for only a 0.025% variation in the mean temperature. With an observed global mean temperature of 288 Kelvin (15°C, 59°F), the expected temperature variation should only be 0.025% of 288K, or .072K. which is about 0.13°F.<br /><br /><br />The much larger real temperature variations we observe on the Earth are local and transient variations (the largest are latitudinal), not global, and are not due to variation in the incident solar power. Day and night is the most obvious example; seasons are due to the axial tilt of the Earth, with the northern and southern hemispheres taking turns having the Sun rise high in the local sky. The axial tilt is small, so the poles are perennially cold and the tropics hot. But all of these large variations average out to a stable global mean temperature, as attested by the century-old Standard Atmosphere model. I confirmed that model precisely, in my 2010 <a href="http://theendofthemystery.blogspot.com/2010/11/venus-no-greenhouse-effect.html" rel="nofollow">Venus/Earth temperatures comparison</a>. It is part and parcel of the current global insanity that that confirmation, of a stable global "climate", is not front-page news worldwide. Your readers should smile to hear that the global mean surface temperature as given by the climate scientists today is SMALLER than that given by the Standard Atmosphere model a century ago, despite that century of supposed global warming. And they should not worry about a "runaway" global climate, either hot or cold. They can count on it varying, between "too hot" and "too cold" (for comfort, that is), as it always has, throughout history.Harry Dale Huffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03210275295826050501noreply@blogger.com