Friday, May 8, 2015
Thursday, May 7, 2015
Celebrating Mothers
By Alan
Caruba
As someone
who had the great good fortune to have had a remarkable mother, a woman who
embraced being my Mother by providing unconditional love and support for my
various activities and decisions over the course of my life, I approach the
subject of motherhood with the knowledge that this does not apply to everyone.
I have
friends whose mothers were true horror stories. One wonders how they survived
theirs. And, of course, I can only approach the topic from a son’s point of
view. A mother’s relationship with a daughter may differ, but I cannot speak to
it. Daughters, too, have benefitted or paid a price for their mothers.
What
struck me as I contemplated the forthcoming Mother’s Day was the way my Mother,
born in the early 1900’s both loved being a mother and, well before the woman’s
movement that demanded equality, was in the adult school workplace teaching the
art of gourmet cuisine for some three decades.
Rebecca
acquired a great following and her classes were always sold old. Mother, who
occasionally expressed regret she had not attended college, had an encyclopedic
knowledge, not only of food, but of wines. Not only would she author two
cookbooks, she would become the first woman board member of the Sommelier
Society of America.
Need it be
said that dinner was the highlight of our days together, Mother, my Father
Robert, and myself. An older brother was largely gone out of our lives as the
result of service in the Army and marriage shortly thereafter.
Mother
brought to her classes the philosophy she lived at home. My Father adored her.
Their marriage exceeded sixty years together. He delighted in her success. That
was reflected in an atmosphere of love that imbued our lives together.
Mother
lived to age 98, passing away in 2002. A day never passes without thoughts of
her. I was truly blessed in the same way my Father, her friends, and countless
students felt. She imparted a philosophy that saw life as a constant
opportunity to learn about one’s passions and to pursue them.
The modern
American holiday of Mother’s Day was first celebrated in 1908 when Anna Jarvis
held a memorial for her mother in Grafton, West Virginia. She had begun her
campaign to have Mother’s Day become a recognized holiday in 1905, the year her
mother passed away. As she put it, your mother is “the person who has done more
for you than anyone in the world.” Several states officially recognized
Mother’s Day and in 1914 President Wilson signed a proclamation creating
Mother’s Day on the second Sunday in May as a national holiday.
There have
been men whose mother’s contributed in significant ways to the success they
achieved. To call them Mama’s Boys is to realize that the relationship had both
a good and not so good effect on them. Elvis Presley began his rise when he
went to Sun Records in Memphis to record some songs as a birthday present for
his mother, Gladys. He was her only child and had a very close, loving
relationship. She was living with him at Graceland until she passed away in
1958.
Another
Mama’s Boy was General Douglas MacArthur. The youngest of her three sons, when
he went off to West Point, she followed, taking up residence at a hotel where
she could keep an eye on him. Reportedly they got together for an hour after he
dined with his fellow students. He, of course, grew up to lead America to
victory in the Pacific Theatre of World War Two. There was nothing about him
that suggested his mother’s close attention and love did anything but prepare with
a great sense of self-confidence.
Franklin
Delano Roosevelt was the only son of Sara and she was as controlling a mother
as one could imagine. After he married Eleanor without Sara’s approval, she
gave them a townhouse in Manhattan which connected to her own! Reportedly,
Franklin latter admitted he had been terrified of her mother his entire life.
That, however, did not interfere with his rising to become President and one of
the great leaders of his times.
One might
speculate that, for good or ill, being a Mama’s Boy, loved and/or controlled applies
in some fashion to the sons of all the mothers.
The
fortunate ones like myself can grow up to bask in the love of their mothers and
look back on their lives together with memories that guide our present lives.
To me,
motherhood, along with fatherhood, has surely got to be the most important job
any woman or man can undertake.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
Obama's Economic Disaster
By Alan
Caruba
Commenting
on the rioting in Baltimore, the Wall Street Journal’s Daniel Henniger was
almost to the end of his April 30 text when he said “On Wednesday morning, the
year’s first-quarter GDP growth rate came in—0.02%. Next to nothing. For the
length of the Obama presidency, with growth significantly below norm,
unemployment for blacks aged 24 and younger has hovered between 30% and 40%.
That’s the real powder key, not the police.”
Most
Americans do not put the state of the economy at the heart of everything else
is occurring. Instead they listen to politicians apply the blame to everything
other than themselves. President Obama spent his entire first term blaming
George W. Bush for the bad state of the economy he inherited, but instead of
addressing it, he increased it by imposing ObamaCare, radically altering how
many would be hired while others were cut to a part-time status. The bill added
a number of taxes as well.
When 2015
arrived in January CNS News reported that “A record 92,898,000 Americans 16 and
older did not participate in the labor force in December, as the labor force
participation rate dropped once again to 62.7 percent, a level it has not seen
in 36 years,” according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
Remember
those unemployed young blacks? In March the BLS noted that a record of
12,202,000 black people were not in the labor force. The unemployment rate for
black people in March was 10.1 percent, which is nearly double the overall
unemployment rate of 5.5 percent. For
black teens, age 16 to 19, the unemployment rate was even higher at 25.0
percent, meaning that one in four black teens who were actively seeking a job
did not have one.
By the
beginning of April, the BLS reported that “a record 93,175,000 Americans 16 and
older did not participate in the labor force in March, as the labor force
participation rate dropped to 62.7 percent, the lowest level seen in 37 years.”
Also in
April, the BLS reported that “a record 56,131,000 women, age 16 years and over,
were not in the labor force the previous month, as the participation rate for
this group dropped to 56.6 percent—a 27 year low.
It was no
surprise that the Department of Agriculture reported that “The number of
beneficiaries who receive compensation from the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP), otherwise known as food stamps, has topped
46,000,000 for 37 straight months.”
The U.S.
Census Bureau started 2015 with news that one out of five young adults—white,
black, Hispanic—and ages 18 to 34, currently live in poverty! That’s 13.5 million people, “up from one in
seven (8.4 million people) in 1980.”
If all
this strikes you as very bad news, it gets worse. In February, the Daily
Caller’s White House Correspondence, Neil Monro, reported that “President
Barack Obama has quietly handed out an extra 5.46 million work permits for
non-immigrant foreigners who arrived as tourists, students, illegal immigrants
or other types of migrants since 2009.”
“’The
executive branch is operating a high parallel work-authorization system outside
the bounds of the (immigration) laws and limits written by Congress (and which)
inevitably reduces job opportunities for Americans,’ said Jessica Vaughan, the
policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies” which filed the FOIA
request the revealed this travesty.
So it
didn’t matter to Barack Obama that
millions of Americans were out of work while the White House masterminded a
secretive program to provide non-Americans access to the jobs that were available.
We are
living in the midst of an economic disaster and despite the often rosy
headlines the reality is one that Stephen Moore, the chief economist at the
Heritage Foundation, took note of in January in The Washington Times. He
identified “hidden indicators” of the true state of the economy as 2015 began:
“The $1
trillion growth gap. This economic recovery is the lowest in 50 years”
“The
restless recovery. It’s been 10 years since Americans in the middle class got a
pay raise that kept pace with inflation.”
“Inequality
is worse. The Gini coefficient (as measured by the Census Bureau), the left’s
favorite measure of income inequality, rose each of Mr. Obama’s first four
years in office, breaking all-time highs in both 2011 and 2012, and it remains
high.”
“The debt
has grown by $7.3 trillion. When Mr. Obama entered office the national debt was
under $11 trillion. Now it’s more than $18 trillion…it will be $19 trillion
when he leaves office.”
The record
speaks for itself. Americans are worse off today than when Obama took office in
2009. In the years since then he has totally failed to take the best understood
steps to push back against a recession and unemployment. He has expanded the
federal government. He has failed to initiate a reform of the nation’s tax code
to stimulate investment and expansion.
The
nation’s first black President has so poorly served the interests of the
African-American population that they are worse off today. He has practiced
“equal inequality” by afflicting our other demographic groups, younger workers,
woman, and everyone else who has been left unable to afford college and unable
to purchase a home and start a family. These years will be seen in retrospect
as a desert of opportunity.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
Holding the Voters in Contempt
By Alan Caruba
Today’s
lead story in The Wall Street Journal is about the result of its latest poll
regarding Hillary Clinton. It says a lot about why she and the leaders of the
Democratic Party must surely hold its core members in contempt. “Support for
her among Democrats remains strong and unshaken.”
In the
seven weeks since she announced her candidacy to be the next President of the
United States and then virtually vanished from view, the news about her
destroying private emails that should have been public records and the
shenanigans of hers and Bill’s foundation have taken their toll.
The share
of people with a negative view of Hillary says the Journal “jumped to 42% from
36%” and “only a quarter of registered voters said they view her as honest and
straightforward, down from 38% last summer.” Only a quarter? You mean that many people still think she’s honest?
As Peter Wehner opined in Commentary “the depths of the Clinton’s corruption and avarice
is stunning” noting that “The Clintons have known for years that Hillary would
run for president—and yet they still undertook this transparently unethical and
potentially politically catastrophic action” referring to their foundation’s
actions and the “deletion of 30,000 emails, another breathtaking inappropriate,
and possibly illegal act.”
The track
record of the Democratic Party at this early point in the 2016 campaigns makes
one ask why anyone would still support it, its lone candidate, and its
representatives. The economy has been in the tank for the whole of the Obama
administration, the same one that a Democrat-controlled Congress foisted
ObamaCare on the nation without ever having read the bill.
The
President’s primary obsessions these days are making sure Iran gets to have a
nuclear arsenal, extending diplomatic recognition to Cuba, the leading
Communist nation in our hemisphere, and making sure that our southern border
remains so porous that thousands of illegal aliens can gain access.
I would be
happy to tell you what Hillary’s objectives and policies are, but other than repeating
the same old, failed liberal crap of the past, there’s nothing specific to
identify. Does she want to “help the poor”, “protect the middle class”, et
cetera? Well, sure she does. As to anything else, her opinion today is often in
direct opposition to her opinion of yesterday. She’s not saying much and with
reason; as often as not she makes a fool of herself in the process.
If you
were a leader in the Democratic Party would you take a dim view of those who
vote to keep your candidates in office? Would you, however, even once ask why
the Party is unable to produce more than one candidate for President (forget
Bernie Sanders—he’s a Socialist who votes with the Democratic caucus) at this
point?
And who is
that candidate? It is a former First Lady who has spent her entire life in
politics riding the coattails of her husband, a charming rascal who has cheated
on her for decades. Together they have been in more scandals than can be listed
here.
They may
have been “dead broke” when they left the White House, but they now own two
houses and are worth millions, not the least because as Obama’s Secretary of
State the foundation took in millions in donations and Bill took in millions to
give speeches, often from the same donors. Was the U.S. foreign policy
purchased over her four years? Was the security of the emails she was sending
breached? Definitely. Can you name a single treaty or major foreign policy
achievement of Hillary Clinton’s service as Secretary of State? Neither can
she.
Pause now
and compare that the dynamism of the Republican Party. As Gov. Mike Huckabee
announces today, its slate of presidential candidates is as lively a group as
one can imagine. The Party has asserted control in Congress to the point where
the White House knows it no longer has free reign to destroy the nation in
every imaginable way.
That’s why
voters will in 2016 likely rebuke the Democratic Party in an electoral
bloodbath. It’s why the voices within and beyond the Party should be calling
for Hillary to step aside. It won’t happen, but it should.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Monday, May 4, 2015
A Pox on Baltimore
By Alan
Caruba
Thanks to
an infection and the antibiotics taken to rid myself of it, I have had several
days of being able to do little more than watch the news on television, listen
to it on the radio, and reading about it in my daily edition of The Wall Street
Journal. If there was anything else happening in the world, you would not know
it because it was 24-7 Baltimore, Baltimore, Baltimore.
Specifically,
it was about the arrest and death of Freddie Gray, a known drug dealer and user
with an extensive rap sheet. There are different descriptions of the manner of
his death, but the details of the autopsy are still obscure beyond a reference
to having received a blow to his spine. This is attributed to having been
placed in the police van, shackled hand and foot, but not having a safety belt
applied.
The
response from a certain element of Baltimoreans was to begin to loot, vandalize
and set fire to their own neighborhoods by way of protesting alleged police
brutality. This followed his funeral on Monday. The Mayor’s response was to
tell the police to stand down and let the protesters have their way. When that
predictably did not work, the National Guard was called in and a curfew
imposed.
Capping
these events was the indictment of the six arresting officers by the State’s
Attorney General, Marilyn Mosby that included charges of second-degree murder
and involuntary manslaughter. That seemed to appease the mob that passes for
Baltimore’s citizens.
I wish I
could say I have sympathy for Freddie Gray and his family, but I don’t. I wish
I could say that I feel sorry that Baltimore has been a state of decline and
decay since the last riots in 1968, but no one asks why the trillions of dollars
poured in comparable cities since the days of Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty”
hasn’t demonstrated any results.
I wish I
could say that the connecting factor between Baltimore, Detroit, and other
Democrat-controlled cities was the primary reason that their citizens suffer
unemployment, why their children attend schools that fail to teach them even
fundamental skills, but what has evolved in these distressed cities is a
culture that does not emphasize the traditional family, demand better
education, and replaces the work ethic with the “entitlement” check. The
Baltimore mother who chastised her son to keep him from participating in the
riot is single and has five other children.
These
cities are daily crime scenes. The riot was a crime scene.
And who is
accused of Freddie Gray’s death? Members of the Baltimore Police Force who
initially spotted Gray, a 25 year old with a criminal record, and went to
investigate what they had observed. He ran. They ran after him. That’s what we
want and expect our police to do.
The
indictment, a purely political act intended to quell the angry mood of those
Baltimoreans who protested by committing crimes, is an attack on every police
officer in America. Most are good men and women, but like any other profession,
there are some bad ones. The legion of police who protect us do not go around
murdering suspects indiscriminately.
Tell that
to State Attorney Mosby. Then consider that Freddie Gray’s attorney, William H.
Murphy, Jr. donated $5,000 to her campaign. Consider that her husband, Nick
Mosby, is a Baltimore city councilman with lots of reason to see the riots
quelled.
What these
cities and the decades reaching back to the 1960s all represent is a vocal
resentment of police authority. Back then they were called “pigs.” America has
been drifting away from the traditional respect and regard we have had for our
police.
The
problem isn’t the police.
It’s
liberal notion that raising taxes and heavily regulating businesses large and
small will somehow attract them to our cities. It doesn’t work that way. Our
cities have become great dumping grounds for people who interest the Democratic
Party only around election time.
And that
is a problem for the police. It will
be a growing problem for everyone if we cannot return to a decent respect for
our police.
So, for
now, a pox on Baltimore and on all the politicians from the President on down
who keep telling us the police are the problem, not the world of Freddie Gray’s
roaming our city’s streets.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Saturday, May 2, 2015
In Recovery
Life at "Warning Signs" it going to take a rest in the week ahead. There will be no commentaries while I take my antibiotics and get lots of rest. I expect to be writing again by May 10.
Thanks for visiting "Warning Signs" and for your donations to sustain it.
Alan Caruba,
Editor
Friday, May 1, 2015
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
















