tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post3930582008834504438..comments2023-10-27T03:41:13.171-07:00Comments on Warning Signs: Global Warming: An ObituaryAlan Carubahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10901162110385985193noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-5261878209774842852011-11-05T16:08:08.841-07:002011-11-05T16:08:08.841-07:00--quote--"Considering the long years of media...--quote--"Considering the long years of <strong>media-driven drivel</strong> about global warming, the hoax should have been over by now, given the exposure in 2009 of thousands of emails between the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conspirators and growing body of evidence that everything they asserted was a great steaming pile of horse manure. <br /><br />If there was ever a reason for the U.S. to stop funding the U.N., this is it. [emphasis added -hro]--quote--<br /><br />Hear! Hear! This is also the conclusion one might reasonably infer after reading (my fellow Canadian) Donna Laframboise's recently published exposé of the IPCC: <em>The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World's Top Climate Expert</em>, now available for Kindle, paperback (via Amazon) - and in tree-conserving print-it-yourself PDF. <br /><br />My own view of this book (perhaps somewhat biased by the citation of some of my own work!) is:<br /><br />One cannot over-estimate the importance of this book in addressing the shortcomings of far too many so-called science journalists (and other media mavens) who have been content to let the UN’s IPCC rest on its self-anointed laurels for far too many years.<br /><br />Until this book, far too many questions about the IPCC had been unasked – by far too many influential people. Donna has asked these questions, and meticulously researched the answers, which she presents in an eminently readable (and easily verifiable) fashion.<br /><br />(Links to details and other reviews can be found on my <a href="http://hro001.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">blog</a>.)Hilary Ostrovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11388908429577941821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-70162924948028082022011-10-26T13:25:45.918-07:002011-10-26T13:25:45.918-07:00joer,
There are a number of articles outlining ho...joer,<br /><br />There are a number of articles outlining how Muller is a farce. Please go to Climate Depot.<br /><br />http://www.climatedepot.com/<br /><br />I would like to add that I am somewhat confused by your comment. I hope you’re not being disingenuous! “Say it ain't so Joe”. <br /><br />The truth about Muller has been blasted all over the internet. How did you miss it? <br /><br />Especially this one "WaPo Punked by Berkeley Warmist Posing as Skeptic". <br /> http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2011/10/23/wapo-punked-berkeley-warmist-posing-skeptic<br /><br />Best wishes,<br />Rich KRich Kozlovichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13745960671409518147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-51532474706531384822011-10-26T13:10:19.420-07:002011-10-26T13:10:19.420-07:00@Joseph: Suffice to say you can dismiss the BEST r...@Joseph: Suffice to say you can dismiss the BEST report by Muller. Bottom line: There is no way to know what the Earth's temperature is as there are no enough weather stations and too many that exist are placed near structures that generate heat! The IPCC computer models are now widely known to have been deliberately distorted and falsely based on thin "data." You can visit www.climatedepot.com to get more information.Alan Carubahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10901162110385985193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-70333478213937689882011-10-26T12:36:38.049-07:002011-10-26T12:36:38.049-07:00I wish Mr. Caruba would comment on Richard Muller&...I wish Mr. Caruba would comment on Richard Muller's article in' Real Clear Politics' of October 25.He purportedly was a skeptic ,but now is a true believer and even confirms the famous "HOCKY STICK" graph.<br /><br />It is very confusing to have such a report, without Mr. Caruba's rebuttal.<br /><br /><br />Joseph reganjoerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11254740917111021198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-58445100268248485382011-10-26T00:55:37.522-07:002011-10-26T00:55:37.522-07:00PSST!
I have one billion carbon credits for sale ...PSST!<br /><br />I have one billion carbon credits for sale in this here paper bag...<br /><br />Cheap!Ronbohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02767498198886077632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-41805974754073752292011-10-26T00:44:57.416-07:002011-10-26T00:44:57.416-07:00Alan - don't worry about AGW. Haven't you ...Alan - don't worry about AGW. Haven't you heard that Australia is going to save the planet with a carbon dioxide tax? We are so powerful that our taxes are going to cool the overheating planet from a room in Canberra! All hail the mighty Australian government and the soon to be impoverished tax payers.Lime Litehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15062140213877618320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196554259323465442.post-67256572038127346992011-10-25T15:18:46.752-07:002011-10-25T15:18:46.752-07:00Before I started blogging I used to send article l...Before I started blogging I used to send article links to many in the pest control industry that debunked all the green issues. My view was that once you understood one of their issues you understood how to defeat all of them because they use the same logical fallacy junk science thinking in all of them. <br /><br />It was so obvious that AGW was a crock that I told everyone that I was not going to send out anything more on that subject. That was about nine years ago, and I had to keep sending out article links anyway because it just wouldn’t die!<br /><br />I would have never thought it possible for anything so obviously false to hold on this long. As I told a group at one meeting discussing the removal of the fumigant sulfuryl fluoride: If the internet had been around for the Montreal Protocol we wouldn’t have lost methyl bromide in the first place and this fluoride issue wouldn't be a problem now.<br /> <br />It is interesting that those who jumped on the ozone bandwagon in pest control and worked to eliminate methyl bromide styled themselves as "world problem solvers", by promoted sulfuryl fluoride, are now themselves in the hot seat. There really isn't any fixing stupid.Rich Kozlovichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13745960671409518147noreply@blogger.com