Friday, December 23, 2011
US Navy's Lesbian Kiss Makes Waves
For generations of Americans, the most famous kiss between a Navy sailor and a nurse occurred during the celebration of V-J Day in New York’s Times Square on August 14, 1945.
The photo by Alfred Eisenstaedt was published in Life magazine a week later. It said everything you needed to know about the joy with which the nation responded to the end of World War Two and everything about the shared values of the nation.
So, when a photo of a homecoming kiss between Petty Officer 2nd Class Marissa Gaeta kissing her “partner”, Petty Officer 3rd Class Citlalic Snell went public on December 22, it set gay and lesbian hearts atwitter. What the predominantly heterosexual population thought of it was unreported.
According to news reports, “Navy officials said it was the first time a same-sex couple was chosen to have the first kiss. The first-kiss is a Navy tradition for ships returning to port. David Bauer, the commanding officer of the Oak Hill, said the crew’s reaction was positive” and he informed the Associated Press “It’s going to happen and the crew’s going to enjoy it.”
Different times, different values. Perhaps.
But why? The answer is the way the U.S. military has been used by gay and lesbian advocacy groups as a petri dish to force social change. The other location for influencing such change is in our nation’s schools and manifests itself in charges of massive bullying and questionable sex education curriculums, many of which evoke outrage among today’s parents.
When then-candidate Barack Obama promised transformational change in America, it is doubtful that those who voted for him realized that part of that change was his advocacy of gay rights. In June, at a fund-raiser in New York composed of gay, lesbian, and transsexual supporters, Obama touted his efforts to advance gay rights and promised further progress. He stopped short of declaring support for legalizing same-sex marriage.
Earlier, however, in February the Obama administration said it would no longer oppose legal challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), just two months after Congress and the President agreed to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, the military’s ban on openly gay service members. Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter to Congress saying that DOMA, passed in 1996, “discriminated” against gays.
Let that sink in. The Obama administration thinks that the defense of traditional marriage between a man and a woman is “discrimination.” Since the dawn of civilization, the union between a man and a woman has been the keystone of societies everywhere. Even the extension of “civil unions” with expanded rights for gay couples has not been enough for advocates of homosexuality.
There were and are still good reasons for the military’s opposition to homosexuals serving. Let it be said that homosexuals have probably always served. When I was in the Army in the 1960s, I and others in my unit knew of gays serving along side us, but practiced a tolerance we took for granted by neither acknowledging it, nor engaging in any action based on it.
At the time, there was no such thing as “gay rights” and, were it not for the incessant demands for them, they would not exist today. Gays and lesbians play on the inherent sense of fairness and tolerance that is a hallmark of American society. The result is that homosexuality is now widely represented in popular culture to the point of being accepted as “normal.” It is not “normal.” It is a sexual aberration involving a very small portion of the overall population, perhaps no more than four percent. Always was, always will be.
The U.S. military is a unique element of our society. The 1993 Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell law stated that “there is no constitutional right to serve” and pointed out that the military is a “specialized society” that is “fundamentally different from civilian life.” This was and is so self-evident that the present state of affairs is nothing less than astonishing. Homosexuality was deemed an “unacceptable risk” to good order, discipline, morale and unit cohesion—qualities essential for combat readiness.
Suffice to say Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell opened a Pandora’s box of difficulties for all the ranks. Its repeal has not made those difficulties magically disappear.
The photo of two Navy lesbians kissing represents the “progress” that a vocal minority has made, given the support of liberal politicians on both sides of the aisle working against the tide of resistance of majority Americans who are fighting the social implications of “gay rights”, the demands for “gay marriage”, and the influence over young minds passing through government school systems.
It says something about life in America today, one that is very different from America at the end of World War Two.
© Alan Caruba, 2011
Posted by Alan Caruba at 9:38 AM
Labels: homosexuality, Liberalism, US Military
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Some may call it *progressive*, I call it damned disgusting...
I don't care what these people do in private, but for them to do it IN PUBLIC, for the government and the media to foist it off on us and try to convince us it's *normal*, for the DoD and the WH to be proud to allow crap like this, says a lot about what America ISN'T under the guise of PCness and tolerance..
Heh. On VJ night I was sitting on the curb in Times Square while my parents were bar-hopping, getting snockered. Hey, he wouldn't have to go back to war!
I saw that particular kiss, although it was but one of many, that night.
Most folks bought into the basic-equality of rights vis-a-vis homosexuals, back in the 1970s. The acting out and the outre behavior since then, however, has been and is bringing about resentment and more hostility now that was evident in the past.
Same for the divisive effort of government on racial matters...
“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature” Romans 1:26
I don't car how many laws men pass saying this is OK. Gods word says different.
If I may offer a comment regarding perspective in this 'kiss', notice how this version of a kiss is somehow acceptable.
If the ship's Captain wanted to make a real statement, then maybe that statement would have been somewhat bolder had he selected two men to have that first homecoming kiss.
Imagine the uproar had he actually done that instead of doing it like this.
By taking the 'soft' option of having two women perform this kiss, he has in effect shown the whole thing for what it really is.
A pandering to Political Correctness that this 'kiss' so patently demonstrates is now out of control.
Pandering to the minority percentage like this is an exercise only in Public Relations.
When the ship's Captain said:
“It’s going to happen and the crew’s going to enjoy it.”
you can bet that the vast majority of that crew saw it for what it really was.
PR for the sake of PC.
What have we come to when this is now so brazenly put out there.
Post a Comment