By Alan
Caruba
It’s bad
enough when major environmental organizations continue to lie about a “global
warming” that does not exist in lieu of a planetary cooling cycle now entering
its 17th year, but when those allied with the United Nation’s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are also in charge of
producing a government report on it, the public is being lied to in ways that
obscure their bias and agenda.
This is
the case of the recently released draft report of the National Climate
Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC) titled “Climate Change and the American People.” The majority of the thirteen senior scientists
responsible for it are closely allied with the IPCC. No doubt, the final report
will be cited by the IPCC as further “proof” that global warming is real.
The
Liar-in-Chief about global warming—AKA climate change—is President Obama who,
during his second inaugural speech managed to ignore any mention of the
nation’s catastrophic debt in favor of warning that climate change is causing
forest fires, drought, and powerful storms. Excuse me, but the climate has
always included these natural events. They are not the result of a warming that
is not occurring.
Some believe that an effort
is afoot to revive cap-and-trade legislation that would tax so-called
greenhouse gas emissions despite the fact that they play no role in either
climate change or the bogus global warming. Others think that the EPA will be used as the blunt instrument to restrict emissions.
It is
troubling enough that a January 24 edition of The Wall Street Journal included
a commentary by Bjorn Lomborg, author and director of the Copenhagen Consensus
Center in Washington, D.C., that criticized the President’s speech at the same
time saying “This does not mean that climate change isn’t an issue. In the long
run, the world needs to cut carbon dioxide because it causes global warming.”
No, carbon
dioxide (CO2) doesn’t cause something that isn’t happening. It causes all the
vegetation on Earth to thrive and that is why greenhouses increase it in order
to stimulate growth. Reducing it via government regulation threatens the entire
economy.
According
to the NCADAC report, rising temperatures pose a health threat. They are not
rising and countless retirees head to warmer states for the simple reason that
warmer weather extends life while colder weather kills people. People who live
in Florida and the Southwest are not moving to Minnesota or Alaska.
As Steve
Gorham, the author of “The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism: Mankind and
Climate Change Mania”, has pointed out regarding the NCADAC report, “The
document uses the word ‘extreme’ more than 600 times to create an alarming
picture of the future. It predicts ‘extreme weather events…extreme
weather…extreme snowstorms…extreme winds…extreme drought…extreme floods…extreme
rainfall’ and many other ‘extremes’, all claimed to be due to mankind’s
relatively small emissions of CO2, a trace gas in the atmosphere. The report’s
conclusions are based on computer model projections.”
Environmental
studies professor, Roger Pielke Jr., notes that among those in charge of the
latest government report are its chairman, biologist Jerry Melillo whose online
bio cites his “long association with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change.” One of its vice chairmen, economics professor Gary Yohe has the same
credential. Others affiliated with the IPCC are James Buizer, Sharon Hayes,
Thomas Karl, Susanne Moser, Richard Moss, and Donald Wuebbles whose academic
bio says he “shares in the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his work with the
international Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”
The
connections between these folks and environmental organizations include the
fact that vice-chair Gary Yohe is part of a World Wildlife Fund panel and
Richard Moss used to be employed as a WWF vice president. The WWF is one of the
leading advocates of global warming. James Buizer is on the board of directors
of Second Nature a group whose mission is to create a sustainable society by
transforming higher education. In other words, ensuring that yet another
generation passing through our universities absorb the global warming hoax.
The
federal government has been funding these bogus reports and “research” about
global warming to the tune of billions of dollars for years. The entire purpose
is to keep the hoax alive and it has ensured that agencies such as NOAA and
NASA have participated. Other than Al Gore, the leading proponent of global
warming has been James Hansen who continues to head NASA’s Goddard Institute
for Space Studies.
It is so
bad at NASA that, in February 2012, a group of twenty former NASA scientists
formed a group called The Right Climate Stuff to dispute and debunk the many
lies associated with global warming.
Fundamentally,
you cannot trust anything the federal government, nor its lackeys in the
mainstream media, regarding anything you read or hear about global warming or
climate change. It is a tsunami of lies.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
Americans cannot trust anything any "authority" says about global warming, as all of our institutions have been long suborned to the thoroughly incompetent consensus. And the fraud is blatant, as for example:
ReplyDeleteUS Temperatures Have Been Falsely Adjusted According to the Level of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere
True, Harry. Your linked post is proof of that.
ReplyDeleteHow about we take this one step further and say you can't trust ANYTHING this government tells you.
ReplyDelete"Others think that the EPA will be used as the blunt instrument to restrict emissions."
ReplyDeleteThe EPA is already restricting emissions. In europe, there is a car called the VW Polo Blue, and it has a diesel engine capable of dishing out 78mpg. That same car/engine is Illegal here in the US because the EPA said that it puts out too much emissions per gallon of gas that it uses.
Personally, I think its completely ridiculous to judge on a emissions per gallon basis rather than an emissions per distance traveled basis. Considering everybody wants us to stop using as much gas so that we can use less fossil fuels to make them, you'd think that these cars would be legal.
And they probably would if not for gas/diesel taxes.