By Alan
Caruba
“What’s in
worse shape””, asked the Heartland Institute’s Director of Communications, Jim Lakely, in a January 11th blog post. “The state of the Earth’s
climate? Or the state of the New York Times? Global temperatures are not rising
all that quickly, so the Earth is doing fine. Meanwhile, the Old Gray Lady is
shutting down its Environmental Desk.”
The Heartland Institute has cause to celebrate because it has led the effort to
debunk the global warming hoax, sponsoring international conferences that
brought together the world’s leading scientists and others to demonstrate how
specious the alleged “science” of global warming was and is. It did so in the
face of a United Nations agenda to advance the hoax and a compliant and
cooperative media that did nothing to dispute it.
In the
interest of full disclosure, I have been an unpaid policy advisor to The
Heartland Institute for many years, only once receiving a small grant many
years ago to help fund research involving the global warming hoax. These
days donations to my blog help sustain the effort.
As the
planet enters its seventeenth year in which temperatures have been steadily
falling in response to a natural cooling cycle, the result of reduced solar
radiation, the global warming hoax is finally being revealed as an instrument
of the United Nations and individual governments, including our own, to impose
“carbon taxes” that would raise billions of dollars for everyone involved.
The New
York Times with its vaunted reputation has been suffering the same fate as many
daily newspapers in the U.S., as well as news magazines such as Newsweek and
Time. The rise of the Internet has bled off advertising revenue, but I maintain
that as alternative sources of information became available, the Times and the
mainstream media has suffered a loss of credibility across the spectrum of news
topics.
In the
case of the Times, however, their journalistic sins were much worse than others
because it led the global warming hoax from its beginning, never failing to
fill its pages about rising sea levels (they’re not rising precipitously),
declining polar bear populations (they’ve increased), and using every weather
event from hurricanes to tornadoes to droughts (all cyclical and natural) to
shout about a “global warming” caused by carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse
gas emissions” that had nothing whatever to do with a non-existent threat to
the nation and the planet.
Bluntly
stated, the Times lied about global warming—now called “climate change”—on a
daily basis.
The Times
Environmental Desk had a team of editors and reporters that never lost an
opportunity to further the greatest hoax of the modern era and one can only
hope that reporters like Andrew Revkin will be reassigned to cover high school
football and soccer games in the tri-state area. On his Facebook page, Revkin
said he was never a fan of the desk even though he worked for it and lamented
the elimination of an environmental editor. It is doubtful, however, that the
Times will eliminate its editors and teams that cover the White House,
Congress, and other activities of interest to readers, including sports.
Maybe it
was just serendipitous—the Times has been cutting back on staff for quite some
time now—but I believe the news that the poster boy of global warming, Al Gore,
had sold his television channel, Current, to al Jazeera, a notably
anti-American channel that gained fame broadcasting Osama bin Laden’s rants,
was the “final straw” that led to the decision to shut down its Environmental
Desk.
In a
January 11th Wall Street Journal commentary, Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.,
wrote that “Mr. Gore and his allies wore out their welcome with their
exaggerations, their self-righteousness, and their perfectly foolish insistence
that a plurality of voters could be morally bullied into giving up their
self-interest if chastised long and loudly enough by Mr. Gore.” His commentary
took to task the lies of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) that extrapolated from 1.58% of the Earth surface—the lower 48 U.S.
states—to suggest a global warming phenomenon.
The public
did not rush to purchase electric cars, nor did they install expensive solar
panels on the roofs of their homes. Instead they worried about the price of
gasoline and the rising cost of electricity and other expenses whose costs have
been increased by extraordinary bad “environmental” laws and regulations such
as the requirement that ethanol be added to each gallon, increasing is cost
while decreasing mileage, and destroying the engines under the hoods of
millions of automobiles. As forty percent of the nation’s corn crop was
siphoned off to make ethanol the cost of most food items at the supermarket
increased as well.
The good
news is that there will not be an environmental editor or deputy environmental
editor at the Times, nor seven reporters whose sole job was to report lies
intended to advance and bolster the agenda of the Environmental Protection
Agency, NOAA, and the agendas of heavily funded environmental organizations
such as the Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth, and the World Wildlife
Federation.
The
“newspaper of record” has debased itself and the profession of journalism for
too long as a leading participant in the progressive movement’s effort to
impose socialism on the greatest example of the power of capitalism and the
free market—the United States—the world has ever known.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
With Time, Newsweek, The New York Times and a host of other purveyors of misinformation going down the tubes and either ending their print service or cutting back seriously we can clearly say that the world is becoming safer and smarter. We have to remember that it was the Times that promoted and hid the truth about Stalin, Castro and every socialist monster of the 20th century. They supported those who are directly responsible for the deaths of 100 million people. They haven’t just been wrong they have supported those who are and were evil. They must share the guilt. I predict the day will come when the Old Gray Hag goes out of business and that will be a day for the world to rejoice.
ReplyDeleteAmen to that, Rich!
ReplyDeleteSome good news for a change!
ReplyDelete