By Alan
Caruba
The
debasement of science continues as various elements, organizations and
publications, and the mainstream media circle the wagons to protect those who
continue to spread lies about global warming.
Most recently,
the National Geographic Science Blogs have added Dr. Peter Gleick to its roster
of contributors despite the fact that he stole documents from The Heartland
Institute in 2012, creating and disseminated a phony “memo" to defame the
28-year-old, non-profit research organization.
In his
initial National Geographic blog post, Dr. Glieck described himself as a member
of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. He is also the president of the
Pacific Institute. Among the topics he intends to address are
“misrepresentations of science.”
You can
read the facts about his deception on www.fakegate.org, a website Heartland created after Dr.
Glieck’s aborted effort to spread a variety of lies about its funding and efforts
to debunk the global warming hoax. Dr. Glieck admitted to this and one would
think that such behavior would not be rewarded, but neither the National
Geographic nor the Pacific Institute and other organizations that claim to be
devoted to scientific accuracy and ethics were bothered in the least.
He was
welcomed back to the Pacific Institute with a statement that blandly stated
that Dr. Glieck “has apologized publicity for his actions, which are not
condoned by the Pacific Institute of Directors and run counter to the
Institute’s policies and standards of ethics over its 25-year history. The
Board accepts Dr. Glieck’s apology for his lapse of judgment.”
Lapse of
judgment? Using deception to deliberately slander the Heartland Institute is
hardly a lapse of judgment. Those invested in keeping the global warming hoax
alive are happy to forgive and forget, and hope the public does so as well.
At a
recent convention of the American Geophysical Union, Dr. Glieck was among the
featured speakers, along with Michael Mann, a key figure in “Climategate”, the
2009 exposure of emails between himself and other global warming schemers. Mann
is famous for creating false data to support it and, in 2012, claimed to have
been a joint winner of the Nobel Peace Prize! The Norwegian Nobel Institute
issued a statement “affirming that climate scientist, Michael Mann lied…”
Penn State
University where Michael Mann remains on the faculty despite his Nobel Peace
Prize lie, the university simply scrubbed its websites and official documentation
of his claim.
Considering
that global warming is a lie from start to finish, one must conclude that all
those involved have few, if any, qualms about lying. Indeed, this year the
American Geophysical Union honored Dr. Glieck as a new AGU Fellow.
A year
earlier, then AGU president, Michael McPherson stated that Dr. Glieck’s “transgression
cannot be condoned” and had “compromised AGU’s credibility as a scientific
society.” But that was last year and AGU has the same short memory as other scientific
organizations that have put their reputations on the line for global warming.
Other
professions, such as the law, drum out such people, deny them the right to
practice law in the courts, and treat them with contempt when they engage in criminal or unethical behavior, but in the world of
science these days, such behavior ends up being rewarded and, by inference,
defended.
It is not
surprising that National Geographic has provided Dr. Glieck a platform for his
defense of global warming. It has long perpetrated all the global warming lies
we associate with the hoax.
It is not
surprising that AGU has honored Dr. Glieck barely a year after the revelations
of his attack on The Heartland Institute.
It is not
surprising that Michael Mann remains on the faculty of Penn State University
and continues to earn thousands for speeches about global warming.
Nor should
we be surprised that Al Gore who spent years campaigning against fossil fuels
as the “cause” of global warming should sell his television channel to Al
Jazeera, funded by Qatar, a leading oil producer.
What we
are witnessing is the web of deception, a global conspiracy joined by
governments, including our own, to advance the greatest hoax of the modern era.
Its
victims are those forced to pay higher prices for the energy provided by traditional
sources, oil, natural gas, and oil, along with the higher cost of gasoline that
must be blended with ethanol even if it damages the engines of our automobiles
and drives up the cost of food as a large percentage of our corn crop is
diverted for its production.
If the
so-called “greenhouse gas emissions” of carbon dioxide can be taxed governments
such as Australia’s benefit while the industries and businesses affected are
defrauded and even driven to close their doors. Carbon dioxide does not trap
heat. The Earth balances its absorption and release. It is a minor gas in the
atmosphere, barely 0.038%
There was
a time when science adhered to strict rules of ethical behavior. When those are
thrown overboard, everyone is victimized.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
Alan, re Gleick's (and his apologists') claim of "a lapse of judgement", it simply does not hold water.
ReplyDeleteFar from being a "lapse of judgement" Gleick's choices constituted a (you should pardon my use of the phrase) "sustained effort" over a period of 12 days. IOW, it was a case of murder of the truth, with malice aforethought.
As I had noted on my own blog, until circa Aug. 2011, Gleick was a relatively unknown little pisher in the Big Green Pond, whose greatest claim to fame was posting a "review" of a book, that he clearly had not read!
Gleick must have been fully aware (because it was public knowledge) that Heartland's 2010 annual operating budget - with only a three-year headstart, so to speak - was more than double that of his own little fiefdom. I doubt that this particular discrepancy of financial resources was something that Gleick could accept with any measure of maturity or equanimity.
My conclusion: notwithstanding his MacArthur “genius” status (which makes him “too smart to get caught”) and his apparent lack of a functional moral compass – Gleick is afflicted, if not driven, by chronic green envy.
Alan ,
ReplyDeleteThere`s a good article here on scientific principles losing against the consensus based orthodoxy .
http://joannenova.com.au/2013/02/peer-review-failure-science-and-nature-journals-reject-papers-because-they-have-to-be-wrong/
It`s not just climate science falling victim to postnormal science
Your readers should well know by now that compulsive, inveterate lying is the mark of the real enemies (of both science and individual freedom from governmental tyranny) now. And I only just posted the following link at the Joanne Nova site mentioned by Byron Dawes above:
ReplyDeleteWhy the Climate Debate is Over...