NSA Headquarters |
By Alan Caruba
With all
the dramatics by Germany, Argentina, and the leaders of other nations
protesting that the National Security Agency is spying on them, the experts on
espionage have been patiently pointing out that all nations spy on one another
and always have. Two thousand years ago Sun Tzu, a Chinese general, wrote “The
Art of War” and devoted a chapter to “The Use of Spies” in which he said, “Be
subtle! Be subtle! And use your spies for every kind of business.”
I often
visit “Stormbringer”, a blog by a former U.S. soldier with an extensive special
operations background, and he recently published “Rules for Spies” by John
Schindler, “a National Security Agency veteran and now a professor at the Naval
War College.” Schindler spent ten years at the NSA as an analyst and
counterintelligence officer.
Most of us
will never know what really goes on in the NSA and that’s the way it’s supposed
to be, but I will raise a personal objection to its use to spy on Americans. As
I understand it, the NSA is authorized solely to spy on foreign subjects, as is
the CIA. Domestic surveillance is the job of the FBI. Clearly the lines of
legal authority have been breached. One can only hope that congressional
oversight will correct this problem.
In the
meantime, here is a selection from Rules for Spies that will provide some
insight regarding the way espionage and counter-intelligence should be
conducted:
“All
important intelligence methods have already been perfected by the Russians. We
need to figure out how to do them nicely.”
“It’s not
what you know. It’s not who you know. It’s what you know about who you know. If
you don’t understand that, in intelligence, your job is based on breaking other
people’s laws, get out now.”
“U.S.
intelligence is the world’s BIG DAWG, especially in SIGNINT (signals
intelligence) and IMINT (image intelligence, i.e, that gathered by satellites
and other means) but the bureaucracy is so vast as to undercut too much of
that.”
“SIGNINT
is the golden source, but if the enemy doesn’t understand his own system,
neither will you. If you don’t understand the other side’s collection and what
he’s doing to mess up your collection, you’re clueless too.”
“The
bigger your bureaucracy, the less effective your intelligence system is. No
exceptions.”
“You can
learn tradecraft. You can’t learn common sense. Nor can you get ‘up to speed’
on a problem in a couple of weeks.”
“Intelligence
services are accurate reflections of their societies. It’s not always a pretty
picture.”
“The best
way to protect your secrets is to steal the other side’s.”
“If you
don’t own the street, the other side will. And soon they will steal your lunch.”
Schindler’s
reflections on bureaucracy and the way it can undermine or misinterpret
intelligence are of particular importance in the present time. The U.S. not
only has the largest intelligence gathering operation on planet Earth, but its
size can contribute to failures to analyze and act on it.
Examples
of this would include, of course, the 9/11 attack that transformed America in
major ways. Despite a huge Homeland Security Department, created in the wake of
9/11, and the existence of the FBI, NSA and the CIA, none of that vast
structure deterred the Boston Marathon massacre last year, despite intelligence
passed along by the Russians regarding the brothers who perpetrated it.
Examples
of this would include, of course, the 9/11 attack that transformed America in
major ways. Despite a huge Homeland Security Department, created in the wake of
9/11, and the existence of the FBI, NSA and the CIA, none of that vast
structure deterred the Boston Marathon massacre last year, despite intelligence
passed along by the Russians regarding the brothers who perpetrated it.
The most worrisome aspect of all the intelligence gathering is the capacity of a those in positions of leadership in America to use it against Americans who are simply exercising their First Amendment rights.
Recently, as reported in The Washington Times, “Maryland State Police and federal agents used a search warrant in an unrelated criminal investigation to seize the private reporting files of an award-winning former investigated journalist”, Audrey Hudson, “who had exposed problems in the Homeland Security Department’s federal air marshal service.” The documents revealed her sources within the department. The Times is “preparing legal action to fight what it called an unwarranted intrusion on the First Amendment.” The seizure is consistent with the Obama administration’s campaign to identify “leaks” to journalists.
Stop Watching Us is a collective of 100 public advocacy
groups, among them the American Civil Liberties Union, Freedom Works, as well
as individuals like Chinese artist/activist Ai Weiwei and Glenn Greenwald, the
journalist who worked with Edward Snowden to expose many of the NSA’s
surveillance procedures. Snowden, however, is in my opinion a traitor.
Philosophically,
I am in agreement with Stop Watching Us, but I have no problem with spying on
others, allies and enemies alike.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
1 comment:
It is naive to think the US does not collect intel (spy is such an ugly word) on every major government and group in the world.
However it is another example of the incompetence of our current Administration that a low-level contractor would have access to sources and methods involving a NATO ally.
Post a Comment