By Alan Caruba
Let me
begin by saying that the deal the U.S. struck with Iran on November 24 is so
criminally stupid that mobs with torches and pitchforks should be surrounding
the White House and Department of State demanding that the President and
Secretary of State resign.
How many
times does the United States have to make really bad deals with really bad nations?
And then call it progress!
In 1994,
former President Clinton announced that a deal with North Korea had agreed to
“freeze the major elements of its nuclear program.” A new round of talks was
scheduled—in Geneva—to dot the i’s and cross the t’s. Virtually the same
language was used by President Obama in his late evening announcement of a
fundamentally useless, but extremely dangerous agreement with Iran.
Worse than
accepting Iran’s deception, it is as if Obama knew nothing of the North Korean
deal that subsequently resulted in its development of a nuclear weapon despite
some costly bribery exacted for promises it never intended to keep. The worst
part of this is Obama’s deception of Congress and the American people. Efforts
to grant Iran the status of a new nuclear power had been secretly going on for
a year behind the back of Congress.
On hearing
of the deal, Rep. Mike Rogers said “That’s the one thing the whole world was
trying to stop them from doing,” referring to the permission granted to
continue enriching uranium. “We made this mistake in Pakistan. We made this
mistake in North Korea. History is a great judge here and great teacher. Why
would you make the same mistake to a nation that will proliferate a nuclear
arms race in the Middle East if they are successful at getting a nuclear
weapon?”
It is
important to keep in mind that not just the U.S. is a signatory to this
agreement, but also the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia and China. It
was facilitated by the European Union. The lessons of history were totally
ignored. The sanctions imposed by the United Nations on Iran were ignored.
For years
many have taken comfort in the knowledge that, in the past, Israel destroyed
the nuclear reactors that were being built in Iraq and more recently in Syria.
An attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities was assumed to have the support of U.S.
military power in the event that Iran would retaliate either directly or
through its terrorist proxies, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.
It is
clear now that Obama has abandoned Israel as well as Saudi Arabia which also
regards Iran as its enemy. Obama has embraced America’s enemy since the Islamic
revolution in 1979. He has not brought us closer to peace. He has brought the
world closer to World War Three.
I am not a
military strategist, but one need not be to understand Israel’s peril or the
limits on its ability to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, many of which are
underground or heavily defended.
Here are
some comparisons:
Iran has a
population of 78,868,711. Israel has a population of 7,765,700.
Of these,
those fit for military service are 39,556,497 in Iran and 2,511,190 in Israel.
Comparing
active military personnel, Iran has 545,000 and Israel has 187,000.
Iran has
650,000 in military reserves. Israel has 565,000.
Iran’s
annual defense budget (in USD) is $10,687,000,000 and Israel’s is
$15,209,000,000.
The
comparison of their military capabilities is equally daunting. A sobering
analysis is offered on the website of the Jewish Virtual Library.
Even if
Israel were to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, it would also have to fend off
massive rocket attacks from Hezbollah and Hamas.
What
defies Obama’s reasoning is Iran’s long history of attacks on the West. It has
specialized in taking hostages, initially in Lebanon from 1984 through 1992. It
seized the American embassy in 1979 and held American diplomats for 444 days. It holds an American cleric as this is
being written.
In 2011,
the U.S. discovered that Iran had conceived and funded a plot to assassinate
Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the U.S. in Washington, D.C. At the time, the
State Department said that the thwarted plot “underscored anew Iran’s interest
in using international terrorism—including the United States—to further its
foreign policy goals.”
Obama’s
ability to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its intent to become a Middle
East hegemon through diplomacy does not exist.
A race to
acquire nuclear arms has begun in the region where Israel and Pakistan already
have them, as does India and China. Saudi Arabia has announced its intent to
secure nuclear weapons.
One can
only conclude that this interim agreement is a repeat of the appeasement that
occurred in Munich when European nations sought a similar agreement with the
Nazi regime. The lessons of history are unforgiving.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
If you didn't believe before now that the job of the current administration is to tear down the US from the inside and destabilize the world wherever it can, you have to believe it now. My mother taught me one thing: don't believe what people say. Watch what they do. That tells you who they are.
ReplyDeleteBy now it is clear that nearly everything that comes out of our President's mouth is strictly rhetoric and it is safer to disregard it and believe the opposite. Makes us wonder how much Valerie Jarrett's control over the administration really extends. Your article is something everyone should read.
ReplyDeleteYoung King David was dwarfed the Goliath the giant. Even so he only needed one stone, placed just right, to bring him down.
ReplyDeleteIran may dwarf and out number Israel in every way...but remember they have nukes.
Just one of them, placed just right, will also bring the modern Persian giant down.
Israel has sworn that never again will 6 million of their own perish at the hands of a tyrant world power. And they mean it!
The Cassandra in me thinks that Obama wants a Third World War to use as a means to declare martial law and crush liberty in the Homeland.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting to note that past Progressive presidents - Wilson and Roosevelt - used world war to oppress the Homeland, Roosevelt even going so far as to throw thousands of innocent Americans into concentration camps.
Pat Buchanan sees it differently and is right:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/11/patrick-j-buchanan/is-the-superpower-scared-of-iran/