By Alan
Caruba
As the
crisis in Ukraine unfolded, President Obama met with Benjamin Netanyahu, the
Prime Minister of Israel while John Kerry, the Secretary of State, continued to
flog Obama’s push to get Israel to grant the Palestinians a state of their own.
At their meeting Netanyahu was far more concerned with Obama’s failure to stop
Iran from making its own nuclear weapons. He repeated that Israel will do
whatever it must to protect itself.
Within
days, the Israeli Navy intercepted a ship. the Klos-C, that contained rockets
with a range up to 160 kilometers. It had left Iran loaded with 181 M-302
rockets intended for use by Hamas, the terrorists who control the Gaza. It also
had 400,000 rounds of 7.62 ammunition. Does anyone think that either Iran or
the Palestinians want anything less than Israel’s destruction?
At some
point, interest in the Middle East will reassert itself because, while Obama
has been in office, it has become an increasing threat to ours and the world’s
concern as a hotbed of Islamic fanaticism. Other than Israel, Jordan, and some
Gulf states, the U.S. has few allies there.
What is
rarely, if ever, reported in the mainstream media, the Palestinians have
refused to engage in any serious discussions that would lead to the
establishment of their own state since the founding of Israel in 1948.
They have
preferred their “refugee” status that, at 66 years, makes them the oldest such
group in the world. Since 1949 the United Nations has an entire agency, the
U.N. Relief and Works Agency, that has been devoted to maintaining the camps in
which many live.
Recently,
in the spring edition of the Middle East Quarterly, Efraim Karsh had an
extraordinary review of how their Arab “brothers” in Arab states have treated
the so-called Palestinians. It’s worth recalling that “Palestine” was the name
the Roman Emperor Hadrian used to try to replace “Israel”, but there never was
such a nation. Karsh’s article was titled “The Palestinian’s Real Enemies” as
it looked back over the years since Israel reemerged as a nation.
“For most
of the twentieth century, inter-Arab politics,” writes Karsh, “were dominated
by the doctrine of pan-Arabism, postulating the existence of ‘a single nation
bound by the common ties of language, religion and history…behind the façade of
a multiplicity of sovereign states;’ and no single issue dominated this
doctrine more than the ‘Palestine question’ with anti-Zionism forming the main
common denominator of pan-Arab solidarity and its most effective rallying
cry…nothing has done more to expose the hollowness of pan-Arabism than its most
celebrated cause.”
The Arabs
distrust each other more than they are distrusted by the rest of the world.
Arab states in the Middle East and in northern Africa are more united by the
threat of being taken over by the Islamic fascists of al Qaeda and comparable
groups. Both Egypt and the Saudis have banned the Muslim Brotherhood. Ironic,
eh?
In his
quest to become the caliph of those states, Emir Faisal ibn Hussein of Mecca,
the hero of the “Great Arab Revolt” against the Ottoman Empire, together with
his father and older brother Abdullah, placed Palestine on the pan-Arab agenda
by falsely claiming that those living in what was regarded as southern Syria,
had been promised a nation of their own, but in 1919 he signed an agreement
with Chaim Weizman, the Zionist leader, supporting the 1917 Balfour Declaration
on the establishment of a Jewish national homeland in Palestine. In 1920, he
declared himself the king of Syria. After the French removed him, he laid claim
to be Iraq’s ruler, a position he held until his death in 1933.
Over the
decades “the Arab states continued to manipulate the Palestinian national cause
to their own ends. Neither Egypt nor Jordan allowed Palestinian
self-determination in the parts of Palestine they occupied during the 1948
war.” In April 1950, the territory now called the West Bank was formally
annexed by the Hashemite kingdom of Jordan.
Hafez
Assad who had seized control of Syria, controlling it from 1970 until his death
in 2000, described Palestine in 1974 as “a basic part of southern Syria” but
said that the Palestine Liberation Organization, appointed by the Arab League
in October 1974 was “the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian
people” so long as it did not deviate from the destruction of Israel. It never
did, nor has the Palestinian Authority that replaced it.
No matter
where Palestinians lived throughout the Middle East, they were endlessly
harassed by Arab nations. “As a result, the vast majority of Palestinians have
remained stateless refugees with more than half living in abject poverty in
twelve squalid and overcrowded camps.”
In one
Arab nation after another, other than Jordan, they have been refused
citizenship and barred from professions and other rights, but even Jordan drove
them out when they attempted to seize control in 1970. They fled to Lebanon
where they encountered a similar fate, but led by Hezbollah they have gained
control there.
“Not only
have the host Arab states marginalized and abused their Palestinian guests, but
they have not shrunk from massacring them on a grand scale whenever this suited
their needs.”
In the
current Syrian civil war, “thousands of Palestinians have been killed…and tens
of thousands have fled the country.”
So who are
the enemies of the Palestinians? It is not the Israelis who have spent more
than six decades trying to come to some arrangement with them to achieve peace and end
their daily attacks.
As Obama
and Kerry continue to threaten Israel with reprisals if they don’t make peace
with a people who have never demonstrated any desire for anything other than
Israel’s destruction, the isolation of the Palestinians is likely to continue
for a very long time to come. It was imposed by the Arab states. If those states
formally recognize Israel it could end, but that prospect is nowhere in sight.
The
current U.S. policy toward Israel and the Palestinians ignores history. Their
Arab “brothers” regard the Palestinians as a threat to their state’s
sovereignty and events in Jordan, Lebanon, and elsewhere confirm that view.
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
Hi Alan;
ReplyDeleteThe other Arabs view the Palestinians at the bottom of the middle east "food chain" they have contempt for them. The other Arabs view them as "disposable".