By Alan
Caruba
“A
lie told often enough becomes the truth,” said Vladimir Lenin who led the
revolution that imposed Communism on Russia.
When
he wrote, ‘Mein Kampf’, Adolf Hitler said “whoever has the youth has the
future.” In his vision for the Nazi Party, education would be the key that
ensured that he had ‘the youth’ of Germany fully indoctrinated.
All
dictators and authoritarian regimes know that what is taught in their schools
offers the greatest opportunity to maintain control over their societies.
That
is what has been occurring since the introduction of the Common Core standards
that the Obama regime has imposed on our national education system and the good
news is that protests against it from concerned parents and others are
beginning to increase and gain momentum.
Teachers
will tell you that “one size fits all” does not apply in the classroom and
never has. Children learn at a different pace with some doing so rapidly while
others need extra help and attention. Learning that is entirely dependent on
ceaseless testing puts stress on every child and that is the most common
complaint about Common Core.
Education
in America has been in decline since the 1960s when the teachers unions gained
control over the process, putting themselves between the local boards of
education and parents. Would it surprise anyone to learn that the Department of
Education was established by President Jimmy Carter who signed it into law in
1979? It began operation on May 4, 1980. You will find no reference, no mention
of education in the U.S. Constitution and it should not be a function of the
federal government.
In
a recent commentary by Joy Pullmann in The Daily Caller, she said, “The latest
scheme is the field testing of Common Core assessments. This spring more than
four million kids will be required to spend hours on tests that have little
connection to what they learned in class this year and will provide their
teachers and schools no information about what the kids know.”
“Parents
who object to this scheme,” said Pullman, “face bullying and harassment from
public officials. From New York to Denver to California, some schools are
responding by forcing kids who opt out to sit at their desks and do nothing
during the several-hour tests. Normal people call that a ‘time out’ and it is a
punishment.”
Wyoming
has become the first State to block a new set of national science standards
that address climate change. In Michigan last year a group of protesters
stopped the State from adopting the science standards.
Here
are some excerpts of what the science standards teach as “The Essential Principles of Climate Science.”
#
“The impacts of climate change may affect the security of nations. Reduced
availability of water, food, and land can lead to competition and conflict
among humans, potentially resulting in large groups of climate refugees.”
#
“Humans may be able to mitigate climate change or lessens its severity by
reducing greenhouse gas concentrations through processes that move carbon out of
the atmosphere or reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”
#
“The most immediate strategy is conservation of oil, gas, and coal, which we
rely on as fuels for most of our transportation, heating, cooling, agriculture,
and electricity. Short-term strategies
involve switching from carbon-intensive to renewable energy sources, which also
requires building new infrastructure for alternative energy sources.”
From
“A Framework for K-12 Science Education” children are to be taught that “If
Earth’s global mean temperature continues to rise, the lives of humans and
other organisms will be affected in many different ways.” Only the Earth’s mean
temperature is not rising! The planet
is in a natural cooling cycle that is now seventeen years old, meaning that
none of the students in today’s schools have ever experienced a single day of
“global warming.”
By
the end of grade 8, the Framework teaches that “Human activities have
significantly altered the biosphere, sometimes damaging or destroying natural
habitats and causing the extinction of many other species.” This, too, is untrue. The U.S. Endangered
Species Act, despite listing thousands of species, has not officially “saved”
more than a handful at best and this assertion is questionable.
By
the end of grade 12, students are expected to believe that “Changes in the
atmosphere due to human activity have increased carbon dioxide concentrations
and thus affect climate.” While it is true that there has been an increase in
the amount of carbon dioxide this is a good thing because it is an essential
factor in the increase of all vegetation that includes food crops and healthier
forests. Moreover, this increase does not play any role in the Earth’s climate.
The central theme of
these “science standards” is to teach that we should be reducing our use of
fossil fuels, the primary energy sources our nation and the world requires.
What these standards do in reality is repeat and reinforce federal government
laws and regulations to justify its CO2 emissions regulations based on the
current method of computing the Social Cost of Carbon, but these "costs" are pure fiction.
None
of the computer models that have predicted global warming over the past four
decades have been accurate. None are capable of representing the state of the
Earth’s vastly complex climate.
The
sooner Common Core is removed from the nation’s education system, the better.
Editor's Note: To learn more or follow the debate on Common Core, visit
The Heartland Institute's "Education Weekly" newsletter that provides data via Common Core Watch.
Editor's Note: To learn more or follow the debate on Common Core, visit
The Heartland Institute's "Education Weekly" newsletter that provides data via Common Core Watch.
©
Alan Caruba, 2014
The die is cast for America.
ReplyDeleteIt's either revolution and civil war or death by Communism.
Well said, Alan.
ReplyDeleteOne of the worst things we've observed in modern education is the failure to teach kids to read properly. Most schools ignore the phonetic basis of the English language and simply encourage the kids to memorize the most frequently used words in popular literature -- as if they were pictures -- and leave it at that. This causes severe under-development of the left side of the brain (the part that sequences, and scans, and puts one thought after another) and over-development of the associative right side of the brain, often resulting in dyslexia and ADHD.
Imagine, for example, being presented with these 25 words as your first exposure to reading:
the of and a to in is you that it he was
for on are as with his they I at be this have from
What could you do but memorize whole words as if they were pictures?
But now imagine being presented with these 25 words:
cat hat rat pat fat sat at bat vat
ran man can pan tan van jan
bad fad lad had dad mad rad cad sad
Almost immediately, with just a tiny bit of help from a parent or teacher, you'd be scanning from left-to-right, recognizing common word endings, sounding out unfamiliar words, etc.
Two excellent books on the subject are Rudolf Flesch's "Why Johnny Can't Read and What You Can Do About It" (written in 1955) and "Why Johnny Still Can't Read -- A New Look at the Scandal of Our Schools" (written in 1982).
My wife and I were so incensed when we saw what was happening in our local schools (and found that we, like Flesch, could do very little about it) that we wrote a do-it-yourself teach-your-kid-to-read course for any parent who wants to head off (or undo) what the schools are doing to their kids. It's free and it's here:
www.rhymingreader.com
What is happening in education is we teachers are not giving the students the skills to problem solve. Reading is a perfect example. As the writer above said, memorizing is what is being taught, not the skill of deciphering. Couple no skills with students with little desire to work through a problem and you get chaos.
ReplyDeleteBut Common Core solves that by allowing more than one correct answer for a question. Now we have relativeness. Our recent training for Common Core explained that to us, at least until the computers crashed. 40 teachers in a room and technology stopped us short. What will happen to students?
Some of the reasons I am retiring in six weeks after 31 years of teaching.
One size fits all has destroyed state education in the UK. Sadly, it's my generation, the 60s graduates, who are responsible for this. However, the Free Schools initiative launched by the Coalition is a fight back, handing education back where it belongs - to parents.
ReplyDeleteThe basics worked well for generations... Then there was *new math*, and it was a disaster.. I have managed quite well to not use algebra for the last 45 years or so, new math was a joke though...
ReplyDeleteAnd asking questions like "If Tommy has 2 Mommies and they both get pregnant from a *donation* of an acceptable donor.." It's pure garbage...
As a retired public school teacher I am convinced that our only hope is to rescue our children from the public (government) schools and raise a godly generation.
ReplyDeletePlease see "Call to Dunkirk" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRGZLSVph3A.
Public schools cannot be redeemed. Saying we should not abandon them is like saying the passengers of the Titanic should have stayed aboard because the band was playing good music and the captain was a good man.
Please also see IndoctriNation at http://indoctrinationmovie.com.
Additionally, please see http://insectman.us/exodus-mandate-wv/index.htm.
We must RESCUE OUR CHILDREN!
I just saw a commercial on TV promoting Common Core. As if the endless Obamacare commercials aren't bad enough, now they're going to propagandize us with our own money for this garbage. Here in Ohio, they put inserts in our property tax bills encouraging people to apply for all sorts of benefits too ...
ReplyDeleteThere should be some sort of law against using tax money to promote these government programs. If a program is worthy of the public's interest, they shouldn't need to be encouraged to use it. The least the entitlement class can do is make the effort to seek these programs out for themselves. Of course we all know why they're doing this ... the more people they can hook on these programs, the easier it is to buy their votes.