By Alan Caruba
With some
of the most sophisticated computers and satellites at its disposal, the U.S.
Weather Service cannot tell you with any certainty what the weather will be in
your area two weeks from now. It’s not that they don’t give forecasts beyond
that a good try, but when you have to work with computers that cannot determine
cloud formation and cover, significant factors, you have to just make your best
guess.
Since the
1980s, following a decade in which an ice age was being predicted, the global
warming charlatans operating out of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change began to generate predictions of an imminent and threatening
period of warming for the Earth and, of course, former Vice President Al Gore
became the Predictor-in-Chief for that while also becoming a multi-millionaire
doing so.
Then,
about seventeen years ago, the Earth began to cool, entering a perfectly
natural weather cycle that put an end to the global warming hoax. So the IPCC
and the rest of the environmental crowd began to talk about “climate change”
instead.
They continued
to blame carbon dioxide (CO2)—which they call “carbon pollution”—and the
Environmental Protection Agency keeps flogging this lie because it is the basis
for its criminal agenda to destroy the economy with hundreds of thousands of
regulations over every inch of land and every drop of water in the nation. This
week it embarks on its effort to shut down every coal-fired plant in America
that provides electricity.
Writing
recently in his “blogosphere” at IceCap.us, Joe D’Aleo, a widely respected
climatologist, pointed out that “First of all, carbon pollution is ‘soot’
which we don’t have a problem with—the EPA’s own data shows in fact it is well
below EPA standards, declining 50% since 1999”
“CO2 which
is conflated with soot is a harmless (actually beneficial) gas and every
breathe (that) every human emits (contains) 100 times as much CO2 as is in the
ambient air. CO2 is critical for plant life and we are at the low end of the
scale of CO2 for the earth’s history, just above the survival level needed for
plants which require it for photosynthesis—around 280 parts per million.”
So, who
are you going to believe? A leading climatologist or a former community
organizer, Barack Obama?
It appears that Obama has decided to tell a lot of
lies about the climate for the remainder of his second term in office. Having
failed to resuscitate the nation’s economy and unable to have any effect on
global events as his administration’s scandals mount, Obama has seized upon the
IPCC’s lies about the climate to divert our attention from our real problems.
They have become the basis for official U.S. policy and behavior.
As the
hurricane season from June through November begins, Obama can be found
predicting a rise in these storms in the months ahead, but as June arrived, it
marked 3,142 days since the U.S. last was hit by a major hurricane. This
“drought” of hurricanes is truly unprecedented, dating back to 1900!
Be assured
that Obama will be supported by reports from U.S. agencies like the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Hurricane Center whose
budgets depend on his support. What they won’t tell you is that, thirty years
ago, Dr. William Gray, a distinguished meteorologist at Colorado State University found and documented the
relationship between the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), commonly just called
El Nino that suppresses hurricane
activity.
Forecasters
are anticipating a strong El Nino this year. It is a phenomenon determined by
the ocean and atmosphere in and over the tropical Pacific Ocean. How powerful
is it? Its effects are felt around the world, including the Atlantic Ocean
where most of the hurricanes that hit the U.S. occur. Its counterpart, La Nina,
a cool phase enhances hurricane activity, but that is not going to happen in
the months ahead because El Ninos usually last at least 27 months.
If the U.S.
Weather Service cannot predict the weather two weeks to a month from now, any
predictions regarding the climate—measured in centuries—should be viewed with a very high
degree of doubt. It should be noted, however, that the interglacial period between ice ages is about 11,000 to
11,500 years and the current period is reaching its end.
A
President using the weather to scare Americans should be viewed with
considerable cynicism. Note that Obama keeps referring to the last big storm to
hit the East Coast, Sandy, but it was a tropical storm, not a hurricane
The National Center for Public Policy Research has set forth the "Top Ten Reasons Washington Should Not Impose New Global Warming Laws or Regulations."
The National Center for Public Policy Research has set forth the "Top Ten Reasons Washington Should Not Impose New Global Warming Laws or Regulations."
There will
be dramatic weather events in the months ahead because there are always such events, droughts, storms,
tornadoes, floods, forest fires, et cetera. This is how Mother Earth operates and
always has.
It comes
down to this. If your weatherman tells you it is going to rain tomorrow or in a
day or two, bring an umbrella with you. Beyond that, just enjoy the summer.
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
4 comments:
Well said, Alan - If we can't predict the weather with 100% certainty 24 hours in advance, then how the HELL can anyone predict the coming of Global Warming, or the next Ice Age?
Like with "The Shape of Things To Come" there are too many variables in the equation.
Telling the future is a game of chance. You can guess right or wrong. But when there are facts to support otherwise I lean towards the facts. Fact #1 weather and climate are two different things. Weather is short term and therefore extremely unpredictable after two days. Climate is the change over the various years. So when you say there are no facts to support the global warming of the world I have to say look towards historical occurrences as your answer if you need any more help NASA keeps a record of the weather since 1880s. Each year the temperature rises slowly and if you think slow is okay for the world then understand that almost every scientist in the world estimates that a 2 degree change can wipe us out. So I say write about something that you may actually get liked for. Start telling people to stop using fossil fuels and look to a solar and wind. Just a thought.
@Peace. I did NOT say there was no global warming. I said that the claims made by the IPCC were wrong and those now making those claims in the name of climate change are just as wrong. Yes, there was a period of warming from about 1850 on. For the past 17 years, however, the Earth has been in a cooling cycle.
As a resident of Hurricane Alley for over half a century, I have witnessed some pretty severe storms.
However, even tho, I relish the good news that we are expected to have a mild hurricane season, one must remember that "mild" is open to interpretation. There are far too many variables about a hurricane to pigeon hole them as we humans try to do.
Already, we are preparing for the new season. We're stocking up on emergency supplies, checking the condition of those supplies that last for many years, and planning our best westerly route out of the area when our options are down to one -- "RUN!"
Alan is correct in this article.
Do yourself a favor and pay a visit to your local Weather Service Office and ask for a tour. It is a real eye-opener.
J.D. Longstreet
Post a Comment