By Alan
Caruba
While our
attention is focused on events in the Middle East, a domestic enemy of the
nation is doing everything in its power to kill the provision of electricity to
the nation and, at the same time, to control every drop of water in the United
States, an attack on its agricultural sector. That enemy is the Environmental
Protection Agency.
Like the
rest of the Obama administration, it has no regard for real science and
continues to reinterpret the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts. It has an agenda
that threatens every aspect of life in the nation.
As Craig
Rucker, the Executive Director of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow
(CFACT) recently warned, “True to her word,” EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy,
“is busily grabbing powers for EPA that Congress specifically chose not to
grant, and that the Supreme Court has denied on multiple occasions.”
“The
federal bureaucracy under the Obama presidency has a voracious appetite for
more power. It despises individual liberty and drags down the economy every
change it gets,” Rucker warns.
In
addition to implementing President Obama’s “war on coal” that is depriving the
nation of coal-fired plants that provide electricity, the EPA has announced a
proposed rule titled “Definition of ‘Waters of the United States’ Under the
Clean Water Act”, redefining, as Ron Arnold of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise reported in the Washington Examiner
“nearly everything wet as ‘waters of the United States or WOTUS—and potentially
subject us all to permits and fines.”
The
President has made it clear that the rule of law has no importance to him and
his administration and this is manifestly demonstrated by the actions of the
EPA. “This abomination,” says Arnold, “is equivalent to invasion by hostile
troops out to seize the jurisdictions of all 50 states. WOTUS gives
untrustworthy federal bureaucrats custody of every watershed, creates crushing new power to
coerce all who keep America going and offers no benefit to the victimized and
demoralized tax-paying public.”
In
response to the EPA’s new power grab, more than 200 House members called on the
Obama administration in May to drop its plans to expand the EPA’s
jurisdiction over smaller bodies of water around the nation. A letter was sent
to EPA Administrator McCarthy and Department of Army Secretary John M. McHugh
(re: Army Corps of Engineers) asking that the proposal be withdrawn.
“Under
this plan, there’d be no body of water in America—including mud puddles and
canals—that wouldn’t be at risk from job-destroying federal regulation,” said
Rep, Doc Hastings (R-Wash), chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee.
“This dramatic expansion of federal government control will directly impact the
livelihoods and viability of farmers and small businesses in rural America.”
Nearly
thirty major trade associations have joined together to create the Waters
Advocacy Coalition. They represent the nation’s construction, manufacturing,
housing, real estate, mining, agricultural and energy sectors. The coalition
supports S. 2245, “Preserve the Waters of the U.S. Act” which would prevent the
EPA and Corps of Engineers from issuing their “Final Guidance on Identifying
Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act.”
What has
this nation come to if the Senate has to try to pass an act intended to prevent
the EPA from extending control over the nation’s waters beyond the Clean Waters
Act that identifies such control as limited to “navigable waters”? You can’t
navigate a water ditch or a puddle!
There are
acts that limit agencies such as the EPA from going beyond their designated
powers. They are the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. The
coalition says that the EPA and Corps “should not be allowed to use guidance to
implement the largest expansion of Clean Water Act authority since it was
enacted. Only Congress has the authority to make such a sweeping change.”
In two
Supreme Court decisions, one in 2001 and another in 2006, rejected regulation
of “isolated waters” by the EPA.
It does
not matter to the EPA or the Obama administration what the Supreme Court has
ruled Congress has enacted in the Clean Water Act, nor the Clean Air Act.
We are
witnessing an EPA that is acting as a criminal enterprise and it must be
stopped before it imposes so much damage on the nation that it destroys it.
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
2 comments:
Regarding the EPA and clean air; I saw something earlier today, I don't remember where, but it opined that we use massive amounts of foreign oil yet we don't fully engage in our own oil exploration and recovery...
The piece challenged that idea and asked, "If drilling OUR oil is bad for the environment, isn't drilling for their oil and our use of it also as bad for the environment?"
I would love to hear the EPAs answer to that one..
Fred, the modern world runs on oil and the US could be energy independent within a few years if we drilled for the enormous amounts we have. The economy would benefit and we would not have to worry about disruptions in the Middle East that would drive up its cost here at home.
Post a Comment