By Alan
Caruba
Americans
are obsessed with fat; either with eating it or being it. We’ve been told that
we’re too fat and we’re told that eating fat is bad for you.
Being fat is your own business. You’ll feel better if you lose a few pounds, but you will enjoy your next meal if it has a fat content rather than being a bland cereal…which explains why so many cereals today have some surgery covering or content.
Being fat is your own business. You’ll feel better if you lose a few pounds, but you will enjoy your next meal if it has a fat content rather than being a bland cereal…which explains why so many cereals today have some surgery covering or content.
The fact
is you can eat almost anything you like and remain a healthy weight if you just
don’t eat too much of it. It’s not rocket science.
For
politicians, however, controlling what we eat has become an obsession. A
demented Democratic Representative, Rosa DeLauro, from Connecticut, has
proposed a bill—the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act—SWEET for short, that
would penalize people one-cent for every teaspoon of sugar used in their drink
of choice. It’s none of her business, let along the government’s, what you want
to drink.
This
obsession with what we eat has been personified by First Lady Michelle Obama
who championed the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kinds Act that overhauled
nutrition standards affecting more than thirty million children in schools
around the nation.
It
authorized the U.S. Department of Agriculture to set standards for all food and
beverages sold during the school day. The law includes vending machines, snack
cards, and daytime fundraisers. That now means that campus bake sales, the most
popular fundraiser, now has to pay heed to a federal law that forbids selling
cakes, cupcakes, or cookies.
Laws like
this are a perfect example of how intrusive into the ordinary lives of
Americans of all ages are laws that are slowly killing the concept of personal choice
and personal freedom. They also demonstrate how wrong such laws are when they
are written and passed by people who are clueless about nutrition.
A recent
Gallup poll on “consumption habits” revealed that “Nearly twice as many
Americans say they are actively trying to avoid fat in their diet (56%) as say
they are actively avoiding carbohydrates (29%). However, fewer Americans are
avoiding fat now more than a decade ago.”
Over the
years as a book reviewer and avid reader, I have read “You Must Eat Meat” by
Max Ernest Jutte, MD and Frank Murray, and “The Cholesterol Delusion” by Ernest
N. Curtis, MD. Both books authoritatively debunk what Americans have
repeatedly been told about meat and cholesterol, but my earliest advisor on
these and other food related topics was Rebecca Caruba, my Mother, who taught gourmet cooking
for three decades in local adult schools and who authored two cookbooks. She
was a keen student of nutrition and early on warned students against margarine,
telling them to use real butter and to enjoy all manner of meats, cheeses, and
other foods we are constantly told are not good for us.
At this
point I want to add Nina Teicholz to the list of heroes like my Mother and the
authors of the two books mentioned above. A skilled journalist, she has written
a 479-page book, “The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat, and Cheese Belong in
a Healthy Diet” ($28.99, Simon & Schuster).
The fact that it includes nearly 140 pages of tiny, single-spaced notes
regarding every detail in the book tells you why it took some nine years to
write it.
Simply
stated, everything Americans think they know about our diets is wrong, the
result of a deliberate campaign to convince us that eating fat is bad for us
when, in fact, creamy cheeses and sizzling steaks are the key to reversing the
obesity, diabetes, and heart disease that affect too many Americans.
As William
Davis, MD, author of “Wheat Belly: Lose the Wheat, Lose the Weight and Find
Your Path Back to Health” said, “A page-turner story of science gone
wrong…Misstep by misstep, blunder by blunder by blunder, Teicholz recounts the
statistical cherry-picking, political finagling, and pseudoscientific bully
that brought us to yet another of the biggest mistakes in health and nutrition,
the low-fat and low-saturated fat myth for heart health.”
The myth
began in the 1950s with Ancel Benjamin Keys, a biologist and pathologist at the
University of Minnesota. He was searching for the causes of heart disease. The
nation was extremely fearful about it and the heart attack that President
Eisenhower had while in office only added to their fears. Keys concluded that
cholesterol was a major factor, but as Teicholz points out “It is a vital
component of every cell membrane, controlling what goes in and out of the cell.
It is responsible for the metabolism of sex hormones and is found at its
highest concentration in the brain.”
Keys and
other researchers, however, noting that cholesterol was the primary component
of atherosclerotic plaques, assumed it to be “one of the main culprits in the
development of coronary disease…This vivid and seemingly intuitive idea,” says
Teicholz, “has stayed with us, even as the science has shown this
characterization to be a highly simplistic and even inaccurate picture of the
problem.” Keys would devote his life to advocating his misinterpretation of
cholesterol and fat.
The
problem with the word “fat” is that it has two very different meanings. One is
the fat we eat and the other is the fat on our bodies. A book worth reading is
“Fat: It’s Not What You Think” by Connie Leas, published in 2008 by Prometheus
Books. As Ms. Teicholz notes, “A large number of experiments have since
confirmed that restricting fat does nothing to slim people down (quite the
reverse, actually), yet even so, the idea that there could be such a thing as
‘slimming fat’ will probably always seem to us like an oxymoron.”
I know
that few will read Ms. Teicholz book, but you will surely welcome knowing that
“saturated fat has not been
demonstrated to lead to an increased risk of heart attacks for the great
majority of people, and even the narrowing of the arteries has not been shown to predict a heart attack.”
The
problem for all of us is that the American Heart Association and the National
Institutes of Health both adopted the incorrect analysis of Keys et all,
institutionalizing the diet-heart hypothesis and thus are setting the nutrition
agenda.
My Mother
cooked the most wonderful meals every day and more so on Sundays. She lived to
98 and my Father to 93, eating all manner of meat dishes along with fish and
other choices. We all ate cheeses with gusto. And, yes, we loved pasta and
Mother’s fabulous home baked breads and desserts. I am coming up soon on age 77
and my diet reflects what kept them alive and disease-free for all of their
years.
If you or
someone you know is seriously obsessed with their weight and health, recommend
“The Big Fat Surprise” to them. I recommend it to you!
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment