By Alan
Caruba
“No. I -- I did
not. Uhhh, I just heard about this... I -- I get well briefed before I
come out here. Uh, th-th-the fact that some advisor who never worked on
our staff, uhh, expressed an opinion that, uhh, I completely disagree with wuh,
uhh, in terms of the voters, is no reflection on the actual process that was
run.” -- President Obama
replying to a question about Jonathan Gruber at the conclusion of the G-20
Conference in Brisbane, Australia.
Will the last
name of the MIT professor identified as the “architect of ObamaCare” become a
verb some day? Will people say “I’ve been Gruber’d? or “The government is
“Grubering again”?
After all,
when he admitted that ObamaCare’s passage was achieved by deceiving the
Congressional Budget Office and the entire American public, turning his name
into a synonym for lying is not unthinkable. Adding insult to injury, he said
the voters were “stupid.”
How stupid
was it for the Democrat-controlled Congress to pass a two-thousand page piece
of legislation that none of them had read? (No Republican in Congress voted for
it.) ObamaCare took over one-sixth of the U.S. economy and did something that
makes me wonder why we even have a Supreme Court. It required people to buy a
product whether they wanted to or not. If they didn’t, they would be subject to
a penalty.
One way of
the other, the federal government was going to squeeze you. The Court did
conclude early on that ObamaCare was a tax, but don’t expect the mainstream
media to tell you about all the other taxes hidden within it.
What
surprises me about the Gruber revelations—available on YouTube to any
journalist who wanted to investigate, but none did—is that there appears to be
so little public outrage. An arrogant MIT professor who received $400,000 from
the government and made millions as a consultant to the states who needed to
understand ObamaCare, calls voters stupid and the initial reaction of the
mainstream media was to ignore the story.
At the heart of the Gruber affair is
the fact that Obama and his administration has been lying to the voters from
the moment he began to campaign for the presidency. In virtually every respect,
everything he has said for public consumption has been and is a lie.
In one
scandal after another, Obama would have us believe he knew nothing about it.
That is the response one might expect from a criminal rather than a President.
One has to
ask why it would be difficult to repeal in full a piece of legislation that the
President said would not cause Americans to lose their healthcare insurance if
they preferred their current plan, that would not cause them to lose the care
of a doctor they knew and trusted, and would save them money for premiums. The
initial deception was to name the bill the Affordable Care Act.
Repeal
would help ensure the solvency of Medicare and restore the private sector
market for healthcare insurance.
This is a
President who was elected twice, so maybe Prof. Gruber is right when he speaks
of stupid voters. Not all, of course,
but more than voted for Obama’s two opponents. As this is written over 45% of
those polled these days continue to express approval for Obama’s performance in
office. How stupid is that?
What is so
offensive about Gruber’s own revelations about the manner in which the bill was
written and the lies that were told to get it passed is the incalculable misery
it has caused millions of Americans.
It has
caused the loss of jobs. It has forced others into part-time employment. It has
caused companies to reconsider expanding to grow the economy. It has driven up
the cost of healthcare insurance. It has impacted local hospitals and clinics
to the point where some have closed their doors. It has caused many healthcare
professionals to retire or cease practicing medicine.
I invite
you to make a list of all the things you think the government should require
you to purchase whether you want it or need it. Should you be required to own a
bike and use it as an alternative to a car? (Yes, you must own auto insurance
to defray the cost of accidents, just as you must pay a tax on gasoline to
maintain our highway system.) Should you
be required to wear a certain style or item of clothing? Should you be required
to get married by a certain age? Should you be required to eat certain foods
and avoid others?
A new
study by the Legatum Institute in London ranked citizen’s perception of their personal
freedom in a number of nations. Americans ranked way down the list at 21 out of
25, well below Canada, France, and Costa Rica to name just three. The study was
based on a 2013 poll.
What is a
stake here is (1) the absolute need for a trustworthy federal government and
(2) the need to repeal a piece of legislation based entirely on lies. On a
larger scale, the right to make your own decisions on matters not relevant to
the governance of the nation should be regarded as sacred, it’s called liberty.
The
Republican-controlled Congress and the Supreme Court are the two elements of
our government that can and must provide a measure of protection against the deception
that is practiced every day by President Obama and members of his
administration. Let’s hope neither is "stupid" in the two years that remain.
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment