Boehner listens to Obama tell more lies |
By Alan
Caruba
I have a
theory that ties in with John Boehner’s third election as Speaker of the House
on Tuesday.
Could it
be that the newly elected congressmen and women are greeted by one of the
members who has been there long enough to be the chairperson of one of the many
committees of the House and quickly informed that they now belong to a very
exclusive group in which they can, with relative safety, ignore the voters who
just elected them?
In the
House there were 58 freshman members and in the Senate, there were 13, some of
whom were formerly members of the House. In total, the opening session of
Congress welcomed 246 Republicans and 188 Democrats.
Those
contesting for the job of Speaker in addition to Boehner were Reps. Ted Yoho
and Daniel Webster of Florida and Louie Gohmert of Texas. The Democrats
nominated Rep. Nancy Pelosi. Four Democrats did not vote for her. Meanwhile
Webster received 12 votes, Gohmert earned three, and Yoho won 2. Of the 408
votes cast, Boehner won 216.
My other
theory is that enough members of the House had concluded that Boehner had done
as good a job as possible under the circumstances and saw no reason to turn the
job of Speaker over to someone who might rock the boat. His opposition came
mostly from the strongly conservative bloc in the House.
What we
likely have in the 114th Congress is a very pragmatic leadership who are not likely to do anything dramatic
regarding immigration, energy, or any of the other issues about which conservatives
want action. In both the House and the Senate, they know what they are up against.
They will put forward legislation, but all it will do is demonstrate what we already know about Obama.
In his
first speech on the floor of the Senate, Mitch McConnell (KY-R), the Majority
Leader, said “Bipartisan compromise may not come easily for the President. The
President’s supporters are pressing for militancy these days, not compromise.”
Those supporters are the Far Left. I doubt that he or John Boehner met with the
President that much over the past six years.
The
Founding Fathers created a republic in which the business of legislating was
intended to move slowly, subject to debate and the need for compromise. Obama
has made it clear he has no intention to work with Congress, especially now
that it is controlled by the GOP. So gridlock will continue and conservatives
will stay angry.
Regarding
my theory that our political class doesn’t really worry that much about what
the voters want, do you recall the omnibus budget that was passed in the last
hours of the previous Congress? That was 2,000-plus pages crammed full of
things we are not likely to ever learn about until well after the money is
spent. Does that suggest that the members of Congress think it wiser to keep us
in the dark? Yes.
Think of
it another way, Over the course of the last six years with Obama as President,
the House passed some fifty resolutions calling for the repeal of ObamaCare. Were
we supposed to take that seriously? Are we going to see legislation repealing,
for instance, Obamacare’s medical device tax? Maybe. I will be very interested
to see any legislation aimed at undermining ObamaCare because I believe the 114th
Congress would prefer to wait for the courts to do that for them.
Boehner
knew early on that Obama was a President who had little regard for Congress or,
for that matter, the Constitution.
Despite a
major rejection of the Democratic Party and Obama’s policies in the 2013
midterm elections, Obama has been acting as if the Party won those elections
and they had confirmed his agenda. He has let it be known he has no intention
of negotiating, preferring to use his veto power, unilateral executive orders,
and to get what he wants via various federal agency regulations.
One of the most important functions of
the 114th Congress will be oversight of departments and agencies.
Has anyone heard from the Justice Department’s Lois Lerner lately? Any word
about the Benghazi tragedy?
Little
wonder that, after being elected to his third term as Speaker, Boehner said “All
I ask is that we disagree without being disagreeable.” There are 435 members in
the House of Representatives and Boehner is responsible primarily for its Republican
members. If there are Democrats who are willing to cross the aisle, he will
welcome their votes. As in the Senate, they will be needed on occasion.
Regarding
the passage of legislation, Boehner said “It’s the real work. It’s a grind. The
battle of ideas never ends and frankly never should. We Americans never quit,”
adding “Let’s once and for all prove the skeptics wrong.”
It is worth keeping in mind, as Karl Rove reminded us in a Jan 7 commentary, "Every Republican senator and virtually every congressman challenged as insufficiently conservative won their primaries." The voters have spoken.
As unhappy as many conservatives are with Boehner and those they call RINOs (Republicans in Name Only), Boehner did not sound like a man expressing great joy at having been reelected to what appears to be a very difficult job. That this is his third term suggests that his colleagues in the House have a measure of respect for him that his critics do not.
As unhappy as many conservatives are with Boehner and those they call RINOs (Republicans in Name Only), Boehner did not sound like a man expressing great joy at having been reelected to what appears to be a very difficult job. That this is his third term suggests that his colleagues in the House have a measure of respect for him that his critics do not.
The House
and Senate used to be exclusively an old white man’s club. Now the Speaker and
the Senate Majority Leader are looking at an extraordinarily diverse
membership.
The same
day Boehner was reelected Speaker the Congressional Black Caucus hosted a
swearing-in ceremony to welcome new and returning members of the House and
Senate. There were 46 of them.
Rep. Mia
Love (R-Utah) will make history as the first black Republican woman in
Congress. She and the others represent the largest Black Republican class in
Congress since the Reconstruction era. Makes you wonder what those blacks
rioting in the streets are so angry about? More than 125 blacks have been
elected to Congress over the past forty years, including of course, Barack
Obama.
The 114th
Congress has been hailed by The Hill
as the “Most diverse Congress in history to take power.” There are a record
number of female lawmakers at 104, alongside 420 men. Hispanic lawmakers will
number 33 with 30 in the House and Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) in the Senate.
There are 12 Asian-Americans and Oklahoma has contributed two Native-Americans.
The Hill
reports that “A vast majority of lawmakers identify as Christian, either
Protestant or Catholic, along with 16 Mormons.” There are 28 Jews, two
Buddhists, two Muslims, and one Hindu.
Think
you’d like to have John Boehner’s job or Mitch McConnell’s? To all that
diversity add political points of view that range from Far Left to Far
Right.
Let me
return to my original theory. In the House, though they must face election
every two years, I suspect they quickly conclude that there is no satisfying
the voters so they might as well vote as they wish. In the Senate where they
face election every six years, that goes double or triple.
These are
professional politicians. Of the new Congress, ten have been governors, 32 were
mayors, and 251 served in state legislatures. It’s a job they have chosen and,
frankly, I am glad it is them, not me.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Alan, we need term limits for every federal office. The positions were never meant as permanent jobs.
ReplyDeleteThe Mainstream GOP made it very clear a while back; they insisted that if TEA Party candidates were elected, once they got to Washington they would immediately be co-opted into the GOP proper and thus rendered harmless. I guess this is one time the GOP told the whole truth.
ReplyDeleteThanks for reminding us of the vast divisions in the country. It seems nothing has changed from the beginning of the US. I inherited a book from my mother published in 1960 that details the Federalist Era of Washington and Adams presidencies.
ReplyDeleteFighting for power was the driving force then, as it is now. Issues are different, but the vast chasm between power-seekers and the average citizen are the same.