By Alan
Caruba
Is it too
soon to begin to sum up President Obama’s “legacy”? Possibly, but after six
years we know enough to draw some conclusions.
There is
much to protest on any given day Obama sits in the Oval Office with all its
powers at his disposal. The Constitution granted the executive branch
considerable power, particularly in the conduct of foreign affairs but the
Founders also created a system to offset the office when it comes to domestic
affairs.
It is
clear that Obama has virtually no interest in foreign affairs, preferring to
tell lies about Islamic terrorism and to ignore Russia’s seizure of Crimea and its
support of insurgents in eastern Ukraine. Instead he has devoted most of his
time, when not vacationing and playing golf, to his domestic agenda. It has
proven to be a failure.
The
failure of ObamaCare, introduced with a series of lies, is the most dramatic
feature of his legacy. While it remains a law, it has been so plagued with
problems that one can easily imagine it being repealed once Obama is out of
office. It has seriously harmed what was widely understood to be a costly
system. By now, thanks to Jonathan Gruber, one of its architects, we know that
both he and the President knew it would be largely unaffordable back in 2009
and both regarded Americans to be “stupid.”
The
Supreme Court will hear a case, King v. Burwell,
on March 4 and will likely rule in June. As The Wall Street Journal opined, “As
a matter of ordinary statutory construction, the Court should find that when
the law limited subsidies to insurance exchanges established by states, that
does not include the 36 states where the feds run exchanges.” That many states
refused to set up their own exchanges and that tells you just how poorly it was
received.
Fundamentally,
“if the subsidy foundation is undermined, the rest will collapse of its own
weight…The subsidies are crucial to ObamaCare because they offset the added
costs of the law’s regulations.” Suffice to say, Republicans who now control
Congress had better have some measures to enact to replace ObamaCare. And, yes,
if it was passed in whole, it can be repealed in whole.
While 36
states refused to participate in ObamaCare’s exchanges, 26 states joined
together in a legal suit against the legitimacy of Obama’s unilateral executive
order intended to alter the laws regarding illegal aliens, but only Congress
can change those laws. No President has the authority to do so.
Ironically,
on President’s Day, February 16, Federal Judge Andrew Hanen enjoined Jeh
Johnson, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, from implementing
“any and all aspects of phases of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans
and Lawful Permanent Residents program as set out by Johnson in a November 20,
2014 memorandum.
The
injunction was based on “the failure of the defendants to comply with the
Administrative Procedure Act.” That Act governs the issuance of new rules and
regulations by government agencies, including requirements that public notice
be posted and opportunities to comment exist before a substantive rule can be
enacted. The routinely arrogant Obama administration ignored this.
The
greater issue, of course, has been Obama’s refusal to obey the existing
immigration laws in order to add five million or more illegal aliens to the
U.S. population without their going through the process that millions of others
have obeyed.
If Obama
won’t obey the law, why should he expect the states or anyone else to do so?
The suit was brought by the states on the grounds that “the Government has
abandoned its duty to enforce the law” and Judge Hanen concluded that “this
assertion cannot be disputed.” The case will now move up through the court
system because, of course, Obama’s Department of Justice will seek an appeal.
By the time a ruling is made, Obama is likely to be out of office and his
amnesty efforts will have failed.
Obama’s
two key initiatives will go down in flames and that is very good news.
Beyond
them is the astonishing amount of debt he had added over the past six years,
starting with a failed “stimulus” program that wasted a trillion dollars on
non-existent “shovel ready” jobs, the bailout of General Motors that left taxpayers
with a loss of $11.2 billion, and grants to “clean energy” companies, many of
which went belly up.
As of this
writing, not only has the credit rating of the U.S. been downgraded for the
first time in its history, but U.S. debt stands at $18 trillion and growing.
That is definitely not good news.
We can,
however, as Obama’s term of office recedes with every passing day, know that
his “transformation” of America into a socialist state will end in failure.
When gone, whoever replaces him will have a huge job of reestablishing America
as the leader of the free world.
It will
not likely be a Democrat. Obama’s legacy will include—as it already has—a major
voter shift to support of Republicans in Congress, in the governorships, and
many state legislatures throughout America. And that is good news.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Most of the federal judiciary are political hacks. At least here’s one who believes the law is what it says. But even after these people leave office there's always a negative residual impact. Virtually everything we're facing today can be placed at the feet of Jimmy Carter. His Community Reinvestment Act caused the housing bubble and collapse, leading to our current economic mess. His failure to support the Shah of Iran gave a foothold and courage to the extremists. Now thirty years later the world is left with a mess that is seemingly unfixable. While in office these leftists hire as many extremists as they can to carry out their leftist visions for decades after they’re gone. As bad as Carter was, I hate to think what damage this coterie will carry out in the future. If ever there was a reason to repeal the 17th Amendment – this is it! And since there are so many federal jurists who believe they’re a law unto themselves it’s time to pass a 28th amendment to create term limits for the federal judiciary.
ReplyDelete