By Alan
Caruba
Imagine
you wanted to get in your electric car and drive a considerable distance. It
wouldn’t take long for your car to run out of power, so you would have to have
another car, one using gasoline, to drive behind you to make sure you reached
your destination.
That’s a
description of “renewable energy”, wind and solar, in America today because
they both require backup from traditional energy sources such as coal, oil,
natural gas, and nuclear. And “renewable energy” based on “free” sun and wind
power costs more to produce and purchase. Need it be said that the sun does not
always shine consistently everywhere or at night and that the wind does not
always blow?
Within
twenty-four hours of one another I received a news release from the Governor’s
Wind Energy Coalition celebrating the election of a new chairman and vice
chairman, and read a CNN news article saying that “The White House wants to put
more returning servicemen and women to work manufacturing and installing solar
panels” as part of “his growing list of climate actions meant to combat global
warming.”
That list
was a twelve-page long, single-spaced White House fact sheet. The White House
seems to think that the states can do something about “climate change”, but the
climate is measured in decades and centuries, not whether it is going to rain
next Monday which is something we call “the weather.” And just as you can do
nothing about the rain, neither can you do anything to affect the climate
decades from now.
The White House has a problem. There
is no “global warming.” Even if you change the name to “climate change”, the
Earth has been in a natural cooling cycle for the last eighteen years.
For the
past 5,000 years humans have, as often as not, “done something” about the
climate by moving somewhere else it
was less of a bother and threat or found ways to adapt. Other than prayer,
there was and is nothing humans can
do about Mother Nature.
Most
surely, getting veterans to manufacture solar panels is about as lame and
stupid an idea as the President has proposed in the last 24 hours. Does the
name “Solyndra” ring a bell? It was one of several solar farms that, along with
wind farms went belly-up, leaving investors and consumers with nothing but the
sunlight and passing breezes.
Indeed,
the best news of late has been that the U.S. Senate has rejected a proposal to
extend the federal wind Production Tax Credit (PCT) for another five years. The
wind producers have benefitted from it for three decades. The federal subsidy
to wind-energy producers expired along with other tax breaks at the end of
2013, but was retroactively extended through 2014 as part of the Cromnibus
budget bill passed last December.
The PCT
was intended to provide what was a then-new energy industry a helping hand, but
it kept being extended and the industry benefitted as well from renewable
energy mandates (REM) in 29 states and the District of Columbia. They require that a specific amount of
electricity be purchased from renewable energy, wind or solar, producers. All
that managed to do was drive up the cost of electricity to consumers. This is
what happens when politicians get involved.
That’s a
good reason to wonder why there is a Governors Wind Power Coalition in the
first place. It consists of 23 Democratic and Republican governors from every
region of the nation “working together to develop the nation’s wind energy
resources”, but the nation doesn’t need wind energy which produces an
unpredictable amount as opposed to traditional resources such as coal.
At the
same time the President is talking about solar and wind power, his
administration is pursuing a relentless “war” on coal that is forcing the
primary source of electricity in America, coal-fired plants, to shut down. If
that doesn’t sound like treason, then consider too that the U.S. is the
greatest producer of oil and natural gas in the world and we have at least two
century’s worth of known coal reserves. We have absolutely no need for wind or
solar energy.
When Obama
gave his State of the Union speech in 2014, solar power represented a pathetic
0.2 percent of the U.S. electricity supply according to the U.S. Energy
Information Administration. According to the Energy Research Institute, in 2013
wind power provided 1.6% of all the energy consumed in the U.S.
There
isn’t a single good reason for either wind or solar power in an energy
powerhouse like the United States. They are both costly, unpredictable, and a
threat to a number of animal species. Neither the science, the cost, nor the
recent history of “renewable energy” provides a single good reason to force
Americans to pay for this “green” failure.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Anyone with a lick of sense would know--indeed, has known all along--that if wind and solar could do the job, they would already have taken over long ago, due to good old supply and demand. This is not rocket science, as the saying goes. Modern civilization is energy intensive beyond the power of wind and solar to provide. Those who would force "renewable energy sources" down our throats need to be reminded that the Industrial Revolution already decided that question, long before anyone now alive was born. (And they need to be informed, in no uncertain terms, that we will not allow them to force lies--blatant lies--down our throats.)
ReplyDelete