By Alan
Caruba
Only fools
express any trust in Obama these days or the Iranians who have made him look
the fool when no one in their neighborhood or the world trusts a thing they say
or do.
After more
than six years of listening to President Obama’s unremitting lies, when he says
of the latest “accord” with Iran, “It’s a good deal” and standing in the Rose
Garden declares that the U.S. and Iran have reached “an historic understanding”
the only history being made his own ignominy and idiocy.
It would
be historic if anyone could extend either President Obama or the Iranians any
trust. Indeed, since the U.S. created its first atomic bombs to end World War
II, one nation after another has secured their own nuclear weapons, starting
with the then-Soviet Union who built theirs with plans stolen from us!
We have
been down this road before. On April 1st Wall Street Journal
columnist Daniel Henninger offered an abridged look at the quarter-century of negotiations
with North Korea which agreed to all manner of terms, signed all kinds of
agreements, and joined various international organizations to assure everyone
of their peaceful intent. He warned that “No agreement is going to stop Iran.
Agreements, and a lot of talk, did not stop North Korea.”
“Iran,”
said Henninger, “knows it has nuclear negotiators’ immunity: No matter how or
when Iran debauches any agreement, the West, abjectly, will request—what
else?—more talks. Iran’s nuclear bomb and ballistic missile programs will go
forward as North Korea’s obviously did, no matter what.”
All the
back-and-forth between the White House and Congress about the “accord” is
essentially meaningless. It is mostly a debate about the treaty-making powers
the Constitution extends to the executive branch and, at the same time, limits
with legislative “advice and consent” of the Senate. For now the Senate can
only wait for whatever is decided by June 30, but it is unlikely Obama will
send it the text of the agreement.
To
influence the outcome, Congress talks of the sanctions it has imposed on Iran
and says it will impose again, but Obama has no legal authority to lift those
sanctions, only Congress does.
The same
day the President made the announcement, Javad Zarif, the Iranian counterpart
to Secretary of State John Kerry made his own announcement. The U.S. and Iran,
he said, had agreed in principle to let Iran continue running major portions of
its nuclear program. “None of those
measures”, intended to slow Iran’s progress, “include closing any of our
facilities. We will continue enriching; we will continue research and
development.”
This is
the result of 18 months of “negotiations” with Iran. In the same way the U.S.
caved to North Korea since the 1990s, it has caved to Iran and it has done so
with the blessing of the European Union and the other members of the P-5+1,
France, Great Britain, Russia, China, and Germany.
For good
measure, to show how wonderfully warm the relations between Iran and the U.S.
are, within hours after Obama’s announcement, Foreign Minister Zarif accused
the U.S. of lying about the details
of the tentative framework—“the historic understanding”—saying that the U.S.
had promised the immediate termination of sanctions.
The notion
that we would know if Iran was continuing its nuclear program because the
United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would be inspecting
its facilities is about as credible as similar inspections in North Korea when,
in 2002, it cut the IAEA seals on its nuclear factories and withdrew from the
non-Proliferation treaty, starting a nuclear reactor. It has pursued its
nuclear weapons and missile programs ever since.
In the same fashion as the Soviet Union, China, and Israel, we didn’t know that either Pakistan or India had acquired nuclear capability until after they tested theirs. That’s how we will know when Iran has nuclear weapons. It already has intercontinental missiles with which to deliver them.
As quoted
in an April 3 article by Mark Dubowitz, executive director, and Annie Fixler,
policy analyst, of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, they cite an
unnamed “senior State Department official” as saying “The truth is, you can
dwell on Yemen, or you can recognize that we’re one agreement away from a
game-changing, legacy-setting nuclear accord on Iran that tackles what everyone
agrees is the biggest threat to the region.”
Unless one
believes in unicorns and other fantasies, this latest “accord” and what we are
being told about it by the President and the State Department is not a great
achievement. It is doomed to failure because Iran has had no intention of doing
anything other than getting economic and other sanctions removed. Time is on
their side as they work to develop their own nuclear weapons.
When Iran
tests its first nuclear weapon, Obama should return his Nobel Peace Prize.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
I trust Obama and I'm not a fool.
ReplyDeleteI trust Obama to continue his career of treason until the end of his days as president.
Sadly, Ron, his treason will not end when he leaves office.
ReplyDeleteAlan, you beat me to it. I was about to say the same.
ReplyDeleteOnce a traitor always a traitor. He has been an active traitor for long before he ever became president, and he will continue on long after.