By Alan
Caruba
Earth Day
was declared in 1970 and for the past 45 years we have all been living in the
Environmental Insane Asylum, being told over and over again to believe things
that are the equivalent of Green hallucinations. Now the entire month of April
has been declared Earth Month, but in truth not a day goes by when we are not
assailed with the bold-faced lies that comprise environmentalism.
Around the
globe, the worst part of this is that we are being victimized by people we are
told to respect from the President of the United States to the Pope of the
Catholic Church. Their environmentalism is pure socialism.
Organizations
whom we expect to tell the truth keep telling us that “climate change is one of
the biggest global security threats of the 21st century.” This was a recent statement by “world leaders”
like the G7, a group of finance ministers and central bank governors of seven
advanced economies, the International Monetary Fund, Canada, France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, and the United States. On April 17 they adopted a report about
the “threat” put together by think tanks that included the European Union
Institute for Security Studies and the Wilson Center in Washington, D.C.
When I
speak of “climate” I am referring to data gathered not just about decades, but
centuries of the Earth’s cycles of warming and cooling. When I speak of
“weather”, the closest any of us get to it other than today’s, are local
predictions no longer than a few days’ time at best. The weather is in a
constant state of flux.
Climate
change is not a threat and most certainly there is no global warming. As Prof.
Bob Carter, a geologist at James Cook College in Queensland, Australia, has
written, “For many years now, human-caused climate change has been viewed as a
large and urgent problem. In truth, however, the biggest part of the problem is
neither environmental nor scientific, but a self-created political fiasco.”
The fact
that the Earth is now into the nineteenth year of a natural planetary cooling
cycle seems to never be acknowledged or reported. “The problem here,” says
Prof. Carter, “is not that of climate change per se, but rather that of the
sophisticated scientific brainwashing that has been inflicted on the public,
bureaucrats and politicians alike.”
In a book
I recommend to everyone, “Climate for the Layman” by Anthony Bright-Paul, he draws
on the best well-known science about the Earth noting that “Since there is no
such thing as a temperature of the whole Earth all talk of global warming is
simply illogical, ill thought out, and needs to be discarded for the sake of
clarity. The globe is warming and cooling in different locations concurrently every
minute of the day and night.”
“Since it
is abundantly clear that there is no one temperature of the atmosphere all talk
of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is simply an exercise in futility.” A
look at the globe from either of its two poles to its equator and everything in
between tells us with simple logic that being able to determine its
“temperature” is impossible. The Earth, however, has gone through numerous
warming and cooling cycles, all of which were the result of more or less solar
radiation.
The Sun
was and is the determining factor. The assertion that humans have any influence
or impact that can determine whether the Earth is warmer or cooler is absurd.
The Earth
had passed through warming and cooling cycles for billions of years before
humans even existed, yet we are told that the generation of carbon dioxide
through the use of machinery in manufacturing, transportation or any other use
is causing the build-up of “greenhouse gases” in the atmosphere. We are told to
give up the use of coal, oil and natural gas. That is a definition of insanity!
Here’s the
simple truth that most people are not told: The Sun warms the Earth and the
Earth warms the atmosphere.
As for carbon
dioxide, the amount generated by human activity represents a miniscule
percentage of the 0.04% in the Earth’s atmosphere. There has been more carbon
dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere—well before humans existed—contributing to
the growth of all manner of vegetation which in turn generated oxygen.
Without
carbon dioxide there would be no life on Earth. It feeds the vegetation on
which animal life depends directly and indirectly. As Anthony Bright-Paul says,
“A slight increase in atmosphere of carbon dioxide will not and cannot produce
any warming, but can be hugely beneficial to a green planet.”
The
Earth’s atmosphere is approximately 78% Nitrogen, 21% Oxygen, 0.9% Argon, 0.04%
Carbon Dioxide, and the rest is water vapor and trace gases in very small amounts.
They interact to provide an environment in which life, animal and vegetable,
exists on Earth.
When you
live in a Global Environmental Insane Asylum, you are not likely to hear or
read the truth, but you can arrive at it using simple logic. We know
instinctively that humans do not control the waves of our huge oceans, nor the
vast tectonic plates beneath our feet, the eruptions of volcanoes, the
Jetstream, cloud formation, or any of the elements of the weather we
experience, such as thunder, lightning, and other acts of Nature.
Why would
we blindly assume or agree to the torrent of lies that humans are “causing”
climate change? The answer is that on Earth Day, Wednesday, April 22, we will
be deluged with the propaganda of countless organizations worldwide that we
are, in fact, endangering a “fragile” planet Earth. We hear and read that every other day of the
year as well.
The
achievement of the human race and the last 5,000 years of so-called
civilization is the way we have learned to adapt to Nature by creating habitats
from villages to cities in which to survive and because we have devised a vast
global agricultural and ranching system to feed seven billion of us.
As for the
weather, John Christy, the director of the Earth System Science Center at the
University of Alabama, says he cringes “when I hear overstated confidence from
those who describe the projected evolution of global weather patterns over the
next one hundred years, especially when I consider how difficult it is to
accurately predict that system’s behavior over the next five days.”
“Mother
Nature,” says Christy, “simply operates at a level of complexity that is, at
this point, behind the mastery of mere mortals—such as scientists—and the tools
available to us.”
Whether it
is the President or the Pope, or the countless politicians and bureaucrats,
along with multitudes of “environmental” organizations, as well as self-serving
“scientists”, all aided by the media, a virtual Green Army has been
deliberately deceiving and misleading the citizens of planet Earth for four and
a half decades. It won’t stop any time soon, but it must before the charade of
environmentalism leaves us all enslaved by the quest for political control over
our lives that hides behind it.
We must
escape the Environmental Insane Asylum in which they want us to live.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
Mankind in pursuing the worship of Earth has returned to the Tower of Babylon era rather than turning their hearts and minds to God. They would rather be God and supposedly “save” earth from anyone but themselves.
ReplyDeleteEveryone, on both sides of the "climate science" debate (and now political war), needs to learn and heed the definitive evidence, which contradicts much that is taken for granted by both sides.
ReplyDeleteThere IS one temperature for the globe--it is called the global mean surface temperature, and it is 15°C, or 59°F. Those of you who have visited underground caverns may have learned that they maintain the same temperature, regardless of the time of day or night, or even the season of the year, and in the mid-latitudes that unvarying underground temperature is very near 59°F. Second, for more than a century, countless temperature measurements throughout the atmosphere have affirmed a stable equilibrium temperature structure in the atmosphere, known as the Standard Atmosphere. The sea-level surface temperature in the Standard Atmosphere is 15°C, or 59°F.
Climate science, in pursuing the fantasy of "runaway global warming", has simply turned its back on the well-known, and by definition stable, Standard Atmosphere.
Second--and amazingly, since all of the "experts" believe it--it is NOT true that "the Sun warms the Earth, and the Earth warms the atmosphere." If that were so, then in the same way, the Sun also warms Venus and Venus warms its atmosphere. Yet Venus is covered in a global, miles-thick cloud cover, that reflects most of the incident light from the Sun. And the Venusian atmosphere is much thicker than Earth's atmosphere as well (producing a surface pressure 100 times that at the surface of Earth). What this means is that only a very small fraction of the Sun's energy reaches down to the surface of Venus, not enough to heat it much at all. Yet that surface is much hotter than the surface of Earth, something like 463°C, or close to 900°F, despite receiving very little direct solar energy.
I--and I alone--have compared the temperatures (that is, the temperature as a function of pressure) in the atmospheres of the two very different planets, Venus and Earth, and the result is amazingly simple, and precisely confirming of the Standard Atmosphere. My comparison shows that the Venus/Earth temperature ratio is a constant, throughout the range of pressures in Earth's troposphere, that is entirely, and PRECISELY, explained by the relative distances of the two planets from the Sun, and nothing else. This means, not that the Sun warms the Earth and the Earth warms the atmosphere, but that the Sun directly warms the atmosphere--again, on the global scale of the Standard Atmosphere.
So what becomes of all the heat that we KNOW comes off the surface, which is ALSO warmed by the Sun directly (on the sunlit side of the Earth only, however--not globally!)? I put it this way, some 3 years ago now:
"For Climate, All the World's a Stage"
Summarized: Globally, the Sun warms the atmosphere, to the stable Standard Atmosphere; and regionally, heat from the unevenly warmed Earth DRIVES THE WINDS AND WEATHER.
Earth Day Predictions from 1970:
ReplyDelete“We have about five more years at the outside to do something.”
• Kenneth Watt, ecologist
“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
• George Wald, Harvard Biologist
“We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.”
• Barry Commoner, Washington University biologist
“Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”
• New York Times editorial, the day after the first Earth Day
“Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist
“By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist
“It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,”
• Denis Hayes, chief organizer for Earth Day
“Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”
• Peter Gunter, professor, North Texas State University
“Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
• Life Magazine, January 1970
“At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”
• Kenneth Watt, Ecologist
“Air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist
“We are prospecting for the very last of our resources and using up the nonrenewable things many times faster than we are finding new ones.”
• Martin Litton, Sierra Club director
“By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, `Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, `I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’”
• Kenneth Watt, Ecologist
“Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
• Sen. Gaylord Nelson
“The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years,” he declared. “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”
• Kenneth Watt, Ecologist
Sorry, Harry. I am going to stick with Anthony Bright-Paul's book and its distinguished contributors.
ReplyDelete