By Alan
Caruba
In a
recent Daily Caller article, Michael Bastach took note of “25 Years of
predicting The Global Warming ‘Tipping Point’.” This is the message that the
Earth is warming rapidly and, if we don’t abandon the use of fossil fuels for
power, it will arrive to wreak destruction on the human race and all life on
the planet.
It is
astounding how many past and present world leaders are telling everyone this
despite the total lack of any real science, nor any actual warming—the Earth
has been in a natural cooling cycle since 1997!
At the
heart of the global warming—now called climate change—“crisis” has been the
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that has been
issuing apocalyptic predictions
since its inception in 1988. None of its predictions have come true. How could
they, based as they are on the false science of computer models, not that based
on observable climate events and trends?
To this day our own government through its
meteorological agencies has been caught manipulating the data gathered over the
years to conform with the “warming” scenario. The worst has been the
Environmental Protection Agency which is engaged in an effort to shut down
coal-fired utilities and access to every other energy source on which we depend
to power the nation.
Despite
this national and international effort, mostly likely based on the liberal
ideology that there are too many humans on the plant and dramatic ways must be
found to reduce that number. In the past these anti-humanity advocates could
depend on famine, disease and wars to kill off millions, but in the modern
world that has become less of a threat.
One
libertarian think tank, the Heartland Institute, has been leading the battle
against the global warming/climate change hoax for a decade. As a Heartland
policy advisor I have had a front row seat. In June, Heartland will sponsor the
Tenth International Conference on Climate Change bringing together some of the
world’s leading scientists to recommend that it is time for Congress to “take a
fresh look at climate science”, “explore better science-based policies for
energy and the environment”, and, bluntly stated, to “start over on the
question of global warming?”
It did not
surprise me to learn that Heartland had dispatched staff to Rome when the Pope
announced he too was joining the “climate change” advocates despite its lack of
any basis in science. The group garnered tons of international media coverage
by simply presenting the truth. You can find out more about them here, It didn’t take long for Jeffrey Sachs, a
Columbia University professor and ‘special advisor” to United Nations Secretary
General Ban Ki-Moon, to write a commentary condemning global warming “deniers”
that appeared on a Catholic website called Pewsitter.
Sachs took
particular aim at The Heartland Institute and, despite not attending its Rome
press conference or any of the presentations the experts provided, did not
hesitate to identify Heartland as having been supported for years by the Koch
brothers, known for the support of conservative groups and causes.
Joseph Bast, Heartland president, does not let such cheap shots pass by. “The
Heartland Instituter has received just $25,000 from a single organization, a
charitable foundation affiliated with the Koch brothers during the past 15
years. Our annual budget is approximately $7 million. Even that small gift was
earmarked for our work on health care reform, not global warming. Why does
Sachs mention the ‘Koch brothers’ unless his intention is to smear an
independent organization by falsely implying a much larger or somehow
Improper level of support from some
singularly unpopular billionaires?”
Bast got
to the heart of the war being perpetrated by the either misinformed or
deliberately lying world leaders of the climate change hoax. “The dishonesty of
Sachs’ reference to The Heartland Institute would be startling, coming from a
person of Sachs’ stature, if this sort of misrepresentation of facts weren’t so
common in the debate over climate change. President Obama sets the tone.
Comparing global warming realists to members of the ‘flat earth society’ and
rather ominously calling on his supporters to ‘hold climate change denier’s
feet to the fire.’”
“Sachs has
had a long and distinguished career as an academic and in various government
agencies,” said Bast, “but on this issue he is letting his liberal ideology
cloud his judgement. His short essay reveals a disturbing lack of knowledge
about climate science and compassion toward the billions of people in the world
who will be harmed by the UN’s plans to make energy more expensive and less
reliable.”
“Sachs
ends his essay with a call on people of all faiths to ‘fulfill our moral
responsibilities to humanity and the future of Earth.’ That responsibility
starts with truth-telling. Sachs and his colleagues on the left haven’t reach
the starting line yet.”
It doesn’t
matter if it is the Pope, the President of the United States, or the UN
Secretary General if the assertion that the Earth is warming when it is not or
that coal, oil and natural gas must be abandoned to “save the Earth.” Whether
from ignorance or a dark hidden agenda, the whole of the global warming/climate
change is aimed at harming billions, many of whom need the power that this hoax
would deny to everyone.
© Alan
Caruba, 2015
6 comments:
Anybody who has ever used a balance knows there is no "tipping point". The term was thought up by an economist.
Mr. Caruba, perhaps you've overlooked the vast numbers of people who've been 'dumbed down' enough that they are completely sold on the man-caused GlobalWarmingClimateChangeWe'reAllGoingToDieUnlessGovernmentSavesUs mentality. These are the useful idiots they are counting on to Give them even MORE power than they've already usurped. They wish TOTAL power and are striving for that end. Fifteen years ago I would have said that was a batshit crazy statement I just made. No more.
@William,
You would be hard pressed to be any more correct in what you have stated here, sir.
Thank you, Squidly.
While I personally have a more liberal ideology around climate change it does stand to reason that the continued use of fossil fuel coal etc. is polluting the planet. Maybe it isn't causing global warming (we do often think that we have a larger impact than we do as humans) but it definitely isn't doing the habitat we live in any good. Wondering how you feel about pollution in general or is the pollution that goes into rivers, oceans etc. just collateral damage for a certain lifestyle?
Fleming and Vanessa---you only know what you believe, not what the facts demonstrate. The earth is not being polluted by coal. Coal comes from the Earth! It ia a major source of energy (electricity) to power your lifestyle and nations around the world, providing a better life for everyone, development for jobs, etc. If you don't like coal or other fossil fuels, go live in the forest without them.
Post a Comment