Tuesday, August 31, 2010

All Wars Must End Sometime


By Alan Caruba

As the Vietnam War began to lose momentum for American troops, Sen. George Aiken suggested, “Let’s just declare victory and get out.” This is the way modern wars end.

President Obama noted the 4,400 troops that died in combat over seven and a half years in Iraq. He also made mention of American valor on Iwo Jima during World War Two. What he did not mention were the 26,000 troops that died taking Iwo Jima. Later, it was even worse during the invasion of Okinawa.

Historians noted that “Okinawa was the largest amphibious invasion of the Pacific campaign and the last major campaign of the Pacific War. More ships were used, more troops put ashore, more supplies transported, more bombs dropped, more naval guns fired against shore targets than any other operation in the Pacific.

More people died during the Battle of Okinawa than all those killed during the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Casualties totaled more than 38,000 Americans wounded and 12,000 killed or missing, more than 107,000 Japanese and Okinawan conscripts killed, and perhaps 100,000 Okinawan civilians who perished in the battle.”

That should put our mission in Iraq in some wider perspective as the Commander-in-Chief assured Americans on the evening of August 31, 2010 that “All U.S. troops will leave by next year.”

This is in stark contrast to the fact that U.S. combat troops remain in Europe since 1945, in South Korea since 1953, and on land, sea and in the air, can be found representing U.S. interests on bases throughout the world. We shall be in Iraq when our grandchildren and great grandchildren are born.

In 2008, a majority of Americans seeking “hope and change” elected the most reluctant Commander-in-Chief in modern history and, as he changed the focus of his speech from our military missions to the nation’s economic crisis, the most incompetent Economist-in-Chief.

The speech was intended to clear Iraq and Afghanistan off the President’s very clean desktop in the Oval Office so his campaign for reelection can focus on the economy. Obama knows he can no longer blame it on George W. Bush.

Indeed, at one point he tried to tie the costs of combat in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of the reason for the economic crisis, but they are not. The crisis was based entirely in the collapse of the U.S. housing market, preceded by a curious electronic “run on the banks” during the 2008 election campaign that led to Obama’s election.

At one point he made brief mention of “A new push for peace in the Middle East” referring obliquely to the forthcoming Israeli-Palestinian talks. They will fail. The Palestinian Authority has already offered so many unrealistic demands that these talks like all that preceded them are pure theatre.

Unknown to Americans was another White House event earlier on Tuesday, August 31st. The Islamic Society of North America had announced it in its August 27 newsletter. Long associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, the ISNA was an un-indicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism finance trial.

The Coordinating Council of Muslim Organizations organized leaders of twenty national Muslim groups to attend “a special workshop” presented by the White House and U.S. government agencies (Agriculture, Education, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, etc) in order to provide these groups “special access” that would “cut through red tape” to facilitate federal funding.

Founded in 1928, the Muslim Brotherhood is a global Islamist political movement dedicated to imposing Sharia law on all nations and institutions. Their credo is “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leaders. Koran is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

So, while the President marked the end of the combat mission in Iraq, it is folly to think that the Islamists have anything else in mind than total victory over the West.

After 9/11 George W. Bush did not send troops to Afghanistan and later to Iraq in order to ensure that Muslim groups in America could receive special attention to secure federal funds, but the White House of Barack Obama was tending to this while the President was putting the finishing touches on his speech announcing the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq that evening.

It makes you wonder what Obama’s priorities really are. It makes you wonder if you can trust anything he says.

© Alan Caruba, 2010

10 comments:

Rachel P said...

I've long since decided (what I pretty much knew from the very beginning, long before he was elected) that I can trust NOTHING Obama says. The more I see his agenda unfold, the more I perceive how sinister and Machiavellian he really is. I wrote the word "Machiavellian" and then decided to do a quick look up on dictionary.com to make sure I had spelled it right...when I saw the definition, I was amazed:
"being or acting in accordance with the principles of government analyzed in Machiavelli's The Prince, in which political expediency is placed above morality and the use of craft and deceit to maintain the authority and carry out the policies of a ruler is described."
Wow. If that isn't a perfect description for Obama, then I don't know what is.

HokieFan said...

Machiavellian and Orwellian at the same time... Scary combination...

Travis sez said...

Rachel P is right. And, while we're looking at definitions, another comes to mind: Sinister, sinistra in Italian, means of the left. I can't watch Hussein's speeches any longer. I just turn up the volume and listen from the next room. It's better for one's health to do it that way.

cabby said...

I know what his priorities are I know he can't be trusted and almost every sentence out of his mouth is a lie. This is why impeachment to me is a top priority. Even if Republicans take back both houses in November, with Obama as Commander in Chief our troops will be laying down their life, not for victory over liberties enemies but for appeasement to the far left agenda of withdrawal. I doubt we've ever had a president that hated America and its military as much as Obama. My favorite thing to say privately about someone I perceive as evil is "may they rot in hell". I'm beginning to think that may be to good for Obama.

TexasFred said...

To put it bluntly, Obama is a MORON...

Sadly, since WWII, America seems to have forgotten what it means to *MAKE WAR* and achieve victory...

Maybe it's time we put a WARRIOR in the White House... And I don't mean a duplicitous and PC General, Col. Allen West immediately comes to mind, he's a man I would follow through HELL, carrying a can of gasoline!

commoncents said...

Love your page! Keep up the awesome work!!

Steve
Common Cents
http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com

THE OLD GEEZER said...

I added myself to follow your blog. You are more than welcome to visit mine and become a follower if you want to.

God Bless You ~Ron

Alan Caruba said...

@ Commoncents: Thank you! All compliments happily accepted.

@ TexasFred: Yes, Obama truly is a moron.

Alan Caruba said...

Welcome, Old Geezer.

I could also say that if I were looking in the mirror!

Aurangzeb said...

In Iraq war, there was no victory! This was a war against the weapons of mass destruction which were never found. And apparently it was to distract people from a lot of policies that gw bush was making and wanting to hide, and as a consequence, us is at the virge of disaster today. Obama, is a good man to end this war. I hope there is more peace in the incoming days! A'meen!

Aurangzeb
http://takht-e-sulaiman.eseaf.com