By Alan Caruba
As their
children either start or return to school, parents are naturally concerned
about the quality of education they receive from kindergarten through twelfth
grade. In the past, before the teachers unions gained virtual control of the
schools and before the federal government decided it had to impose “national
standards”, it was the job of local boards of education to ensure students
learned the basics—the three R’s—and, if history is any indicator, they did.
There
should be no federal intervention in our school systems, but programs such as
2001’s “No Child Left Behind” and Obama's "Race to the Top" have conditioned people to accept its role. The
most recent example is Common Core, but it is the creation of the National
Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers. The
support it has received from the White House, the Department of Education, and
voices on Capitol Hill has left many with the impression it is a federal
program. That doesn’t make it any less awful.
If you
want to learn the facts about it, read a brief analysis by Joy Pullman, “Common Core: A Bad Choice for America”, which you can download for free from The
Heartland Institute’s website or purchase copies in quantity. Pullman, a
research fellow, is the managing editor of Heartland’s “School Reform News”,
published ten times per year. For the record,
I am a Heartland advisor.
As Pullman
notes in her analysis, “In 2010, every state but Alaska, Nebraska, Texas, and
Virginia adopted Common Core education standards, a set of requirements in each
grade in math and English language arts.” As school begins this year, four
states, Indiana, Oklahoma, Missouri, and South Carolina have already dropped
the program. Watch other states such as Louisiana and Wisconsin do the same.
Here’s
why. As Pullman notes in a recent article, for the first time the annual Pi
Kappa Delta/Gallup poll revealed that “a majority of Americans—81%--has heard
of Common Core. And 60% oppose it.” As
more Americans learn more about Common Core, they too will oppose it, but the
most intriguing finding of the poll was that, among teachers, there was a drop
of support from 76% last year to 46% this year! The poll demonstrated that “Majorities
wanted local school boards to have far more control over what schools teach
than state or federal governments.”
Pullman
said, “Everyone is for ‘standards’ in the abstract. Everyone is not for
‘standards’ that, like Common Core, coerce teachers and schools, and impose bad
education theories on the countries.”
“Nationalizing
education, like nationalizing anything,” says Pullman “requires compromise to
get enacted. And compromise inevitably sacrifices quality. Quality has to grow
from the ground up, through cooperation and competition, or it will never
exist.”
What
teachers and parents subject to Common Core requirements have learned rather
quickly is that the program has a number of serious flaws. It not only slows
the process of learning multiplication, it dampens the development of the
creative thinking process, and offers a skewed, leftist selection of reading
materials about U.S. history.
Pullman
says, “The most important thing to understand about education standards is that
research has demonstrated they have no effect on student achievement. That’s right: no effect at all. A series
of data analyses from the Brookings Institution found no link between high
state standards and high student achievement.”
Any parent
and any teacher will confirm that different students learn at different rates and
some encounter problems in certain areas. Some are better at mathematics.
Others are better readers and writers. Still others find science or the arts of
greatest interest. People are different. It is foolish to think that children
aren’t.
This is not
to say that the states don’t have education standards. They do and local boards
ensure that their curriculums meet them.
At the
national level, Pullman points out that “the country already has a national
testing program that sets cut scores: the National Assessment of Educational
Progress” that is “a valid, well-respected measuring stick that already offers
states and citizens the ability to compare schools’ progress across state lines
without the intrusions and muddle curriculum Common Core introduces.”
I
recommend you download Pullman’s analysis, but in the meantime let me offer a
good way to understand Common Core. It is the Obamacare of education.
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment