By Alan
Caruba
The
extreme cold that gripped the nation at the beginning of the year just added to
the growing public dismissal of the claims that “greenhouse gas emissions”
would lead to a dangerous stage of “global warming.” Indeed, even the charlatans that have devoted
decades to this hoax are now using the phrase “climate change.”
We tend
not to recall what the weather was like a year ago. In May 2013, Dennis T.
Avery, a senior fellow for the Hudson Institute, noted that “Lots of us are
commenting on the U.S. having the second coldest spring in the official
thermometer record (starting ca. 1860) and the coldest since 1975. This cold
spring highlights another climate cycle that has nothing to do with carbon
dioxide (CO2).”
Records of
cold weather are being broken all around the nation and the world. That’s not
exactly what the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) has been predicting since it was set up in 1988 to get nations to sign
onto the Kyoto Protocols to reduce CO2 emissions, claiming they were causing
warming.
We are all
going to have to pay attention to what President Obama will have to say in his
forthcoming State of the Union speech and other pronouncements about “climate
change” because that is going to be a major theme of his as he begins the
second year of his second term. Climate change ranks right up there with “If
you want to keep your healthcare plan, you can. Period.”
Last
February, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), an extremely liberal group,
wrote Obama to say “We are inspired and gratified by your commitment to address
the threat of climate change. Still gushing, they said that the “science of
climate change…calls for action to swiftly and deeply reduce heat-trapping
emissions and better prepare our nation for now unavoidable impacts.”
If one merely
refers to “climate change” without specifically identifying it, how can the UCS
be so sure that emissions from our cars, trucks, manufacturing, and of course
the coal-fired plants that, until Obama arrived, provided half of all the
electricity Americans need and use. To save us all from the “climate change”
150 of these plants have been closed since he took office.
To replace
them, the Obama administration “invested” in a variety of wind and solar
businesses, most of which promptly went bankrupt with our taxpayer funds. To
get us to stop driving, Obama advocated high-speed railroads in a nation where
people routinely get on an airplane to get to distant cities. Amtrak has never
made a profit since it was created in 1970.
The
President, however, can be counted upon to talk about “climate change” as if
recent examples of it threaten our lives. The facts say something else. For
example, there has been NO global warming for over 17 years. In 2013 there was
a record quiet tornado season and severe tornadoes have been declining for 40
years.
Other than
tropical storm Sandy in 2012, the U.S. has gone more than 8 years without a
major hurricane strike and the U.S. has experienced the fewest forest fires in
three decades and, over the same time period, there has been no sea level rise
on the west coast of the U.S. or Canada.
In
contrast, an Antarctic global warming expedition of 74 eco-tourists, certain
that sea ice there was melting, was trapped by it. In the summer of 2013, all
manner of yachts, sailboats, and others got trapped by sea ice while trying to
sail the Northwest Passage after being told it would be free of ice. It turned
out that 2013 recorded the second highest volume of sea ice ever recorded.
It’s not
that the climate is not changing. The climate—measured in decades and
centuries—has always changed and it does so in remarkably predictable cycles. The
period between ice ages is 11.500 years. We are overdue for the next one, though we did have a mini ice age from
1300 to 1850.
All this scientific data guarantees one thing. The
President is lying when he talks of “climate change” by which he means a
warming cycle. He is lying when he blames it on carbon dioxide which plays no
role whatever in climate change. The $7.45 billion his administration gave to
120 nations between 2010 and 2012 to cope with “climate change” was an utter
waste of our taxpayer dollars. Given the nation’s $17 trillion in debt, it was
money we did not have, but which added to our debt.
Recall, too, that Obama refused to negotiate with the
Republican Party in 2013 when it wanted to reduce such spending, resulting in
the government shutdown that was blamed on the GOP.
You can forget about “climate
change”, but you should keep in mind what the President is doing to bankrupt
America and deny it the production of the energy it needs as the weather gets colder.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
2 comments:
I had a really weird dream last night - somehow I'd been invited to the White House to attend a press conference where the Lamestream journalists, as usual, were throwing softballs at Obama.
I raised my hand to ask a question and was recognized by his Highness.
My question?
"President Obama in view of the fact that America is facing one of the coldest winters on record, why do you keep preaching the hoax of "Global Warming?"
Obama looked me in the eye and said nothing for many long minutes and finally the press conference ended.
When I got home I found a business card taped on the front door from Homeland Security with an agent's phone number on the back, who asked me to call him ASAP.
Then I discovered my neighbor had been arrested for some secret reason by unknown policemen.
I woke up in a cold sweat.
In regards to the "Polar Vortex" that the Lamestream Media has blasted all over the world, I cannot find any reference to a so-called "Polar Vortex" before about a week ago.
Do you think the Lamers would go so low as to create a new hoax to give new legs to their old hoax of Global Warming?
Rush Limbaugh says they did, and I'll believe El Rushbo before I'd believe anything the Lamers.
Post a Comment