By Alan
Caruba
As someone
who started out his career as a newspaper reporter and editor, discovering that
those in public relations pitching their stories were making much more, it
didn’t take long for me to enter that profession. For me, the truth is always
the best PR.
As the
mainstream print and broadcast media’s editors and reporters filled up with
those graduating from the schools and universities of the 1960s and since, it
became more and more obvious that reporting anything fairly and honestly about
the Republican Party and its candidates was a very low priority. Many arrived
at their job with a negative image firmly intact.
Take civil
rights. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. It was the Republican
Party that came into being largely in opposition to slavery and it was the
first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, who put in motion the freeing of
slaves.
That was
followed for a century by a Democratic Party that, in the South, existed to oppress
blacks and deprive them of the Constitutional rights. And yet blacks are a
major part of the party’s coalition!
The
Democratic Party is most identified with the 1930s Great Depression era in
which Franklin Delano Roosevelt instituted government spending as a way out of
the economic doldrums and led the creation of Social Security, followed by Medicare
and Medicaid under Lyndon Johnson, but it took World War Two to break free of the
Depression and the two social programs are, for all intents and purposes,
insolvent and will be without some reform.
When
Americans wanted to see the economy improve they elected Republicans like
Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, and the Bush father and son. Bush43, serving when
9/11 occurred and initiating two Middle East conflicts, added five trillion over
two terms. Obama added six trillion in his first term.
Obama has
set some kind of record for refusing to negotiate with Republicans in Congress
and his namesake “legacy” legislation, Obamacare, was passed in 2009 without a
single Republican vote. If you have been negatively affected by it, keep in
mind it is a totally Democratic Party bill with origins that reach back to
Hillarycare in the 1990s and earlier.
One gets
different figures regarding the membership of the two parties but one source
says fifty-five million belong to the Republican Party. That is less than the seventy-two
million in the Democratic Party.
A record
42% of Americans now identify themselves as independents, the highest since
Gallup began measuring this over the past 25 years. Republican identification
fell to 25%, the lowest ever over the time span. Democratic identification,
31%, has remained the same, unchanged from the last four years, but down from
36% in 2008. Americans are bailing out of the two-party system.
When I was
growing up in the 1940s and 50s, the “image” of the Republican Party was one
composed of upper class, country club and corporate members. I think that
“image” remains to this day. The choice of Mitt Romney in the 2012 election
reinforced it. Ironically, he lost because several million Republicans stayed home on Election Day. Why?
Because serious Republicans—conservatives—did not see a party or a candidate
that vigorously defended their core values and the policies they want enacted.
What victories the GOP had in 2012 were as often as not the result of the
infusion of new blood called Tea Party candidates.
There were
other factors such as the growing diversity of the American population and the
Republican Party is not reaching out to them. They don’t receive much support
from the black population, but neither did they garner much from Hispanics and
Asians. If the Republican Party is only interested in white people, they will
continue to lose elections.
What
worries me most as 2014 begins is what passes for the leadership of the
Republican Party. Neither John Boehner, nor Mitch McConnell, majority leader in
the House and minority leader in the Senate, have any support. A Public Policy poll in November of
Republicans gave only 15% to Boehner and 4% to McConnell.
From the
point of view of a public relations counselor, I can tell you that, in addition
to the bias of the mainstream media, the Democrats have waged a far more
successful PR program against the Republicans for a very long time. It is the
Democrats who have portrayed the Republican Party as anti-women,
anti-immigrant, anti-gay, and anti-poor. These are lies, but the sheer
repetition has been effective.
The GOP wants
the government to spend less because, if it doesn’t, the nation’s financial system
will collapse, but I suspect many Americans have not grasped this simple truth,
particularly if they are among those receiving a government check of some kind
and nearly half of the population is.
Republicans
want to avoid the disaster of Lyndon Johnson’s “War on Poverty” that did not
end it, but did expand the welfare system. It took a Republican Congress during
the Clinton years that reformed welfare, even though Clinton, of course, now
takes credit for it.
In 2014
Obama will talk endlessly about “income inequality.” There is no such thing in
the real world. There are people who earn more because they are worth more, are
more productive, provide services people want, or have taken on the risks
involving investment and business development. What he never mentions is
“income mobility”, the ability to earn more. Obama is, in fact, crushing the
middle class. Obamacare is filled with hidden taxes, higher costs, and fines.
When the
GOP opposed the raising of the borrowing limit yet again, leading to the
shutdown, it was widely said that it hurt their image even though it was Obama
who had ended the White House tours in response to sequestration limits and,
during the shutdown, ordered that veterans be kept from visiting their open air
memorial in the nation’s capital. Who’s cold-blooded? Obama or a GOP trying to
save the nation from dangerous levels of government spending and borrowing?
The
Republican Party is in trouble because the nation is in trouble. We live in a
nation where the annual killing of a million unborn babies is regarded as okay
by a large part of the population in which the number who believe in God is
decreasing. By contrast, traditional supporters of the Republican Party are
southern, white, evangelical Christians.
When 2013 began, the Republican
Party’s “image” was at a historical low; according to the Pew Research Center
for the People and the Press, 62% of the public regarded the GOP as out of
touch with the American people, 56% thought it was not open to change, and 52%
thought it was too “extreme.” The GOP’s
favorable rating has not been above 50% since shortly after George W. Bush’s
reelection in 2004, a decade ago.
Ironically,
Republicans are more critical of their party than Democrats! They do, however,
credit it for its strong principles “and 80% of Republicans say their party is
looking out for the country’s long-term future.” They’re right.
If the
Republican Party needs assistance to get its message out, the Democratic Party
has given it a gift that will keep on giving all the way to the 2014 midterm
elections in November and beyond to 2016’s national elections. Nothing has
demonstrated the arrogance, duplicity, and total incompetence of the Democratic
Party and the Obama administration than Obamacare. The GOP must commit openly
and repeatedly to repealing it.
What
worries me most as 2014 begins is what passes for the leadership of the
Republican Party. Neither Boehner, nor McConnell, have any support. A Public Policy poll in November of Republicans
gave only 15% to Boehner and 4% to McConnell.
Worse
still, McConnell on an Oct 30 conference call organized by Karl Rove’s
Crossroads organization for large donors said that the Tea Party movement, in
his view, is “nothing but a bunch of bullies” that he plans to “punch in the
nose.” Boehner has expressed similar
animosity. In effect GOP elites have declared war on the Tea Party movement.
There is no PR that can justify such stupidity and arrogance.
The
Republican National Party has to begin to raise the funds to craft a campaign
of television commercials that will improve the party’s image in 2014. Its
candidates will need to talk about Obamacare until they are blue in the face.
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
7 comments:
I think the Republican Party may end up like the old Whig Party in the 1850s and a new Rightist political coalition created.
Well, the Tea Party is to the right of the GOP and that may be the outlet needed for those dissatisfied with the GOP. And they do generally support the GOP candidates unless there's one out there from their ranks.
The only thing wrong with the TEA Party is their Libertarian tilt... They have been over-run by Ron Paulians, Paulanista's, Paultards, what ever you want to call them, and when they start up with their *legalize all dope* mantra I get a bit sick in my stomach...
True, the Republicans need to reach out to women, gays & minorities to win any future elections. Unfortunately, it looks like Rove/Boehner & company are doing this by basically turning the knife on those without the blessing of being women, gay or minority....you know, us evil white hetero males, the base of the "tea party". Let's make no mistake, everything that's going on in Washington & in most of the lamestream media is & has been a targeted attack on the white straight male population of America for decades, and it's only intensified under Obama the racist, and the GOP, instead of finding ways to bring EVERYONE together, are also resorting to this, and it's sick. I, a white male born in the US, can envision a time when I may have to leave this country to avoid what I'm sure will be active persecution not unlike what other minority groups have faced in the past. I don't have faith that any Washington politicians have any intention of looking out for my well being, and most of my fellow citizens are shallow, heartless zombies only caring about themselves & their entertainment & won't care about me either. I have no future in this country, especially as an Aspergers sufferer. I may as well be dead for all "the people" give a damn about me.
@Sane & Rational. I agree, the straight, white male has been denigrated for a very long time. There was a time when he was a role model.
Sane, rational individual says, "most of my fellow citizens are shallow, heartless zombies only caring about themselves & their entertainment".
And that's the heart of the problem. Like people, like priest. We'll never get a better government until the people are better. And the first step to getting better people, I think, is figuring out what went wrong: how all the "deep, lion-hearted living ones who cared about others and their work" of decades past turned into the pitiful minions described above. That's where the bus went off the road; that's where it needs to be towed back up out of the ditch.
I'm sure you've given such things a lot of thought, Alan. Perhaps an article concisely summarizing what went wrong during those decades would give us some clues regarding how to get the bus back on the road and our fellows back onto the bus.
"We'll never get a better government until the people are better. And the first step to getting better people, I think, is figuring out what went wrong: how all the "deep, lion-hearted living ones who cared about others and their work" of decades past turned into the pitiful minions described above. That's where the bus went off the road; that's where it needs to be towed back up out of the ditch."
I hate(well, not really) to sound politically "incorrect", but I think where the bus started going off the road & up feces creek is about the time that certain people cared more about where they were sitting on the bus rather than just getting their stupid asses on the bus & doing something constructive.
Post a Comment