By Alan Caruba
Men when
in the company of other men have no hesitancy to admit they have no idea why
women are so different in so many ways.
Well, viva
the difference, but one does have to wonder why so many women of the present
era feel no need for a man as a husband or father.
In May,
the Census Bureau released a report noting that more than six out of ten women
who gave birth in their early 20s were unmarried. “Overall,” a Washington Post
article reported, “36 percent of all births in the United States were to
unmarried mothers in 2011, the year that the census analyzed from answered in
the American Community Survey.” Among whites, it was 29 percent. Among blacks,
it was 68 percent.
For the
second year in a row, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 40.7% of the babies born in the United States were born to
unmarried mothers. That is very bad news.
It is an enormous
commitment when a man asks “Will you marry me?”, but are we in an era when the
answer is “No, thanks” or “Why?” This is happening when women in general still
earn less than men, encounter more problems borrowing for a car or a mortgage,
and, if the Internet match-up services ads are true, are still are looking for
Mr. Right. Their problem often is that he has done a Google search and learned
she would involve a big investment. Many men choose to remain single these days
or as the divorce rate indicates, to opt out of marriage.
None of
this has anything to do with the 2014 midterm elections or the ones in 2016…or
does it?
Well, yes
it does. In a recent Wall Street Journal article, columnist Gerald F. Seib said
“The gender gap is alive and well in American politics. Indeed, it may be the
defining characteristic of our political system as next year’s midterm
elections beckon.”
“We are
not talking here just about the well-established pattern in which women are
more likely to vote Democratic and men Republican in presidential elections.
That’s true, but it appears to be only the tip of a gender-gap iceberg.” And here’s where it gets scary for
conservatives of both sexes, a Wall Street Journal/NBC poll found that 52% of
men want Congress under Republican control “while just 38% of women feel that
way.”
The poll
reported that 49% of women say they approve of the job (Obama) is doing; just
37% of men approve. In either case, the numbers are too high because he has
done the worst job of any President of the modern era or earlier.
Seib
reported that “women are more likely to give the President high grades on
leadership qualities, overall competence, and improving America’s image
abroad.” This is so absurd it defies any explanation. “College-educated women,
in short, emerge as a core Obama constituency.”
That might
not be the case in 2014 because The Hill reports that, based on a Dec 23
CNN/ORC poll, support for Obamacare is dropping rapidly and “The drop in
support indicated could be particularly troubling for the Obama administration
because almost all of it came from women, whose opposition rose from 54% to 60%
in a month.” The poll cited by Sieb
indicates that Republican woman—more than 80%--dislike Obamacare.
The gender
gap is well documented and in 2012 it was the largest in the history of
Gallup’s polls—20 points—since the polls measuring it began in 1952.
One thing
needs mentioning and that is the extraordinary Republican women. There’s Rep.
Michelle Bachman, Sen. Susan Collins, and Gov. Jan Brewer, to name just a few
in positions of political leadership and others like columnists Peggy Noonan.
Michelle Malkin, and Ann Coulter. The list is much longer, but it tells me that
the GOP is fortunate to have them.
Clearly,
the Republican Party has to undertake a major effort to draw more women into
the party and, right now, it is a divided party as the GOP establishment wage
battle with the Tea Party Movement that challenges their control.
It must also strongly refute the Democratic Party's lie that the GOP has "a war on women." There is no such war.
It must also strongly refute the Democratic Party's lie that the GOP has "a war on women." There is no such war.
The GOP, however, need
not look to the League of Women Voters for any support. Despite its claim to be
non-partisan, it has for decades tilted in favor of the Democratic Party and
liberal policies. The League is pro-abortion, favors environmentalism, and a
greater role for government in all aspects of the lives of women and men.
Who knows?
The 2014 and 2016 elections may signal a shift in the liberal views of women
voters. If so, that is bad news for the
Democratic Party, but the Republican Party has to do a much better job of
enlisting the support of American women.
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
7 comments:
The Republican Party needs to do a better job.
There, I fixed it... :)
How do Repulicans appeal to women with their hands out, demanding special treatment, and looking like complete imbeciles while saying "We don't need a man" and then depending on hundreds of them in Washington to make life "more fair" for women? How do you, in good conscious, feed into the delusion that the government is your daddy and it's better than the creep sperm donar mommy slept with? I see no go way of winning over these women--and no reason to even bother trying.
TAC -- I agree.
Why did the Republicans sign off on women getting the right to vote in the first place?
Clearly, females lack the ability to reason and always chose safety and comfort over risk taking.
where can I get this sticker
Merlin, I have no idea how you can get this sticker. I only had the artwork of it. Good luck.
"Why did the Republicans sign off on women getting the right to vote in the first place?"
Because of "do the right thing", "turn the other cheek", "love the sinners" & all other mantras of perpetual appeasement for those who, in all honesty, actually deserve what they positively contribute, which is very little-to-nothing. Because Christianity is fully focused on preserving the enemy while demonizing the faithful. Because rich politicians only care about their image regardless of the outcome....
Post a Comment