By Alan Caruba
If I need
my car repaired, I do not take it to a dentist. If I am seeking advice about
the climate I check out what climatologists and meteorologists are saying, at
least those who have not sold their souls to the global warming/climate change
hoax.
On
September 3 The Wall Street Journal published a commentary by Edward P. Lazear
titled “The Climate Change Agenda Needs to Adapt to Reality: Limiting carbon
emissions won’t work. Better to begin adjusting to a warming world.”
Wrong!
Wrong! Wrong! It’s cooling, not warming.
Apparently
Mr. Lazear is unaware that the Earth has been in a cooling cycle for seventeen years.
A visit to www.climatedepot.com or a subscription to the Heartland Institute’s monthly Climate & Environmental News or a
copy of its policy studies, “Climate Change Reconsidered”, would help him
understand why he’s wrong. Check out www.climatechangedispatch.com as well for the latest commentaries.
Perhaps
his error should be forgiven because Mr. Lazear is an economist. He was the
chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors (2006-09) and head of
the White House Committee on the Economics of Climate Change (2007-08).
Presently he is a professor at Stanford University’s Graduate School of
Business and a Hoover Institution fellow.
He’s not a
fool, but like a lot of academics who lack a background in science, he has been
fooled by the legion of global warming/climate change charlatans from Al Gore
through the ranks of organizations such as the United Nations Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change that depend on maintaining the hoax.
Mr. Lazear
has fallen for the greatest lie ever; the assertion that greenhouse gases,
especially carbon dioxide, are warming the Earth. The hoaxers are calling the
past seventeen years “a pause” in warming, but it is actually an indicator that
the Earth is on the cusp of the next ice age. The period in between ice ages is
calculated at 11,500 years and we are at the end of the current interglacial
period.
“The Obama
administration is instituting a variety of far-reaching policies to reduce
carbon emissions and mitigate climate change. Are any of these capable of
making a difference”, asked Mr. Lazear. “Simple arithmetic suggests not.” Up to
this point I was very pleased with his conclusion, but then he wrote “Given
this reality, we would be wise to consider strategies that complement and may
be more effective than mitigation—namely, adaptation.”
Humans
have been adapting to the climate—the weather—since they emerged as homo
sapiens about 195,000 years ago.
What Mr.
Lazear wants the U.S, to do is limit “carbon emissions” but admits that “The
economics also work against a major transformation in the technology of
producing power, either mobile or stationary. Coal is cheap. Natural gas is
becoming even cheaper.”
The
primary flaw in his commentary is simply that more carbon dioxide is a good
thing. As the primary gas utilized by all vegetation, more means greater crop
yields and healthier forests. What carbon dioxide doesn’t do is “trap” heat
long enough to lower the Earth’s temperature. It represents a mere 0.04% of the
atmosphere.
The Earth
is not a greenhouse with a glass roof. The amount of heat in the atmosphere is
totally dependent on the amount of heat the Sun produces. In its current cycle,
it is producing less.
“Carbon
math,” wrote Mr. Lazear, “makes clear that without major effort and a good bit
of luck, we are unlikely to control the growth of emissions enough to meet the
standards that many climate scientists suggest are necessary.” Those scientists
are usually on college or university faculties where securing federal and other
grants to study a warming that is not occurring leads to urging limits on
carbon dioxide. Others are just huge liars who, like Al Gore, have been making
predictions of warming that have not and are not coming true.
There’s
another reason why there will be more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It
involves two of the most swiftly developing nations in the world, China and
India, both of whom are building coal-fired plants to generate electricity as
fast as they can. This is happening while the Environmental Protection Agency
has been engaged in an all-out war on coal that has closed several hundred U.S.
plants. If an especially cold winter occurs, the demand for electricity to warm
homes and other facilities may overload a system that has been diminished in
scope.
The United
Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is the driving force behind
the global warming hoax. It is holding a climate change summit on September 23.
Guess who won’t be attending? Chinese president Xi Jinping, India’s prime
minister, Narenda Modi, and for good measure, Germany’s chancellor, Angela
Merkel. Others whose leaders will not be attending include Canada, Japan, and
Russia.
In typical
fashion, always predicting climate conditions decades from now, the United
Nations, according to a report in The Guardian, “is warning of floods, storms
and searing heat from Arizona to Zambia within four decades, as part of a
series of imagined weather forecasts” to publicize the climate summit.
All of the forecasts made by a legion
of climate charlatans in the 1980s and 1990s turned out to be WRONG.
You cannot
trust the UN’s World Meteorological Organization which like the IPCC is just
part of a vast matrix of groups that have been so severely corrupted by the
global warming/climate change hoax that one must exercise caution when hearing
its forecasts. If they are for anything beyond two weeks hence, you would be
wise to be dubious.
Mr. Lazear
is just one of many, often with distinguished careers in other fields than meteorology or climatology, who have bought into
the hoax and who declaim the need to reduce carbon dioxide. He’s wrong. The
others are wrong.
And you
need to educate yourself to avoid being afflicted by various government
policies intended to advance the hoax. To start with, do not vote for any
politician who talks of global warming/climate change or uses the term “sustainability.”
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment