By Alan
Caruba
One man
has died of Ebola in the U.S. and he came here from Liberia. Two of the nurses
that tended him are in intensive care and likely to survive. A third was
thought to be infected, but wasn’t. That news has been sufficient to keep most
Americans calm as the media has done its best to exploit Ebola-related news.
The public
absorbed the facts and came to their own conclusion.
An October
8 Pew Research survey found that “Most are confident in Government’s ability to
prevent major Ebola outbreak in U.S.” That reflects the way we have all been
conditioned to look to the federal government to solve our problems, but the
public mood had not changed by October 20 when a Rasmussen Reports analysis of
a survey concluded that “Americans are keeping their cool about Ebola, but some
acknowledge that they have changed travel plans because of the outbreak of the
deadly virus in the United States.”
Wrong.
There has been no “outbreak.” One dead Liberian and two nurses is not an
outbreak.
Fully 66%
of the Rasmussen respondents said that Ebola is a serious public health
problem, including 29% who deemed it very serious, but few believe it is an
active public health threat here in the U.S.
All this
was occurring as spokesmen for the Centers of Disease Control tried to both
warn and reassure Americans, managing only to evoke a measure of derision.
President Obama also sought to reassure Americans, but fewer and fewer believe
anything he has to say these days.
Then he
appointed an “Ebola czar” who had no medical or healthcare background whatever
to qualify for the job. Add in Obama’s failure to institute a travel ban and the
likelihood is that Democratic candidates will pay a price for this on Nov 4.
I suspect
the President’s advisors are telling him the Ebola problem has been a blessing
because the media will not be reporting any of the stories that could harm
Democratic candidates. Starting with the fact that the nation’s voters are
evenly divided between a liberal or conservative point of view that means that
independent voters will be the deciding factor and they are independent because
they pay more attention to events and the news.
One of the
stories that are being held back from the news is the outcome of the U.S. Army
investigation of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl who was traded by Obama for five top Taliban
leaders to secure his release. Members of his unit unanimously say he deserted
them and, if that is the Army’s conclusion, it makes the swap look dubious, if
not treasonable.
The news after the midterm elections will be
filled with reports of employers cutting healthcare insurance to both full and
part-time employees. Wal-Mart has already announced this for its part-timers.
There is already news of the fact the ObamaCare, the Affordable Patient Care
Act, is proving to be very expensive for those who signed up. This includes
news about its higher deductibles and premiums.
Robert E.
Moffit, a senior fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Health Policy
Studies, recently reported that “Thanks to ObamaCare, Health Costs Soared this
Year”, noting that “On November 15, open enrollment in the ObamaCare exchanges
begins again.” Among the lessons learned from Year One of ObamaCare is that
“Health costs jumped—big time.” Compared with employer-based coverage, the
average deductible of a little over $1,000, doubled to more than $2,000.
Obama
promised that the typical family premium cost would be lowered by $2,500, but
it has actually increased and ObamaCare actually reduced competition in most
health-insurance markets. We do not know how many Americans are actually
insured. Despite predictions of millions who would be insured, the
administration “now concedes that there are 700,000 fewer persons in the
exchanges.”
The claim
was that ObamaCare would reduce U.S. health spending, but a recent Health and
Human Services report—delayed as long as possible—found that its Accountable
Care Organization element has increased costs. States are dropping out of
ObamaCare exchanges as a result.
The Obama
administration has been very quiet about his intension to by-pass Congress to
impose an amnesty program for the eleven million or more illegal aliens in the
US. Most polls demonstrate widespread opposition to amnesty. Obama is expected
to try to institute one anyway.
Lastly,
unless the Islamic State shows up at the gates of Baghdad and takes control,
there is likely to be little news from an Iraq that exists now in name only.
The
results of Obama’s six years in office have been a disaster in many ways and
the outcome of the midterm elections will have a dramatic effect on Obama’s
ability to continue his destruction of the U.S. economy and other policies.
Essentially,
a majority of Americans, including many of his former supporters, have
concluded that there is no Ebola crisis and that Obama’s time in office has
been the very opposite of what he promised. The change they want is to see an
end to Obama’s term in office. A start in that direction is the November 4
midterm elections.
© Alan Caruba,
2014
No comments:
Post a Comment