Saturday, November 14, 2009
A Man-Made Financial Disaster
By Alan Caruba
You will recall that, shortly before the end of the 2008 political campaign, the White House announced a threat to the entire financial system and called on Congress to enact emergency spending powers. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 was enacted on October 3, 2008.
Just eighteen days earlier an event occurred that slid under the radar screen of virtually the entire mainstream media. On Thursday, September 15, 2008, at approximately 11 A.M., the Federal Reserve noticed a tremendous draw down of money market accounts in the nation, amounting to $550 billion dollars. It occurred within an hour or two. The money was removed electronically.
It has never been made public which accounts were affected, nor where the withdrawn funds were sent. If we knew those facts, we would know who launched an attack on the United States that has been more devastating than any in our history.
Had the Federal Reserve not closed down the accounts involved it is estimated that by 2 P.M. $5.5 trillion would have been withdrawn and the entire economy of the nation would have collapsed. It would have been followed within a day with the collapse of the world’s economy.
What followed was the sub-prime mortgage loan debacle that can be traced to the government’s intervention into the housing loan marketplace via Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They ended up owning fifty percent of all the loans.
Americans were using home ownership as a credit card and government policies were mandating the issuance of bad loans in the name of “social justice.” Home ownership became “a right”, not an aspiration.
Throughout the 1990s, as communities revalued homes, increasing their alleged worth in order to impose higher property taxes, it was only a matter of time before a financial collapse became a reality. Virtually every State was spending beyond its means and increasing property taxes was the preferred choice to make up the difference.
That collapse, however, was initiated by unknown persons at precisely the time Americans were preparing to select a new president. That was not a coincidence.
In the October edition of “Budget & Tax News”, a publication of The Heartland Institute, a non-profit, free market think tank, there was an article by Sandra Fabry, the government affairs manager for Americans for Tax Reform and executive director of the Center for Fiscal accountability, a project of the organization.
The article was titled “61% of National Income Goes to Government.”
“Americans this year had to toil until August 12 to pay for federal, state, and local governments, according to the annual Cost of Government Day report by the Americans for Tax Reform Foundation and Center for Fiscal Accountability.”
“In 2009, the government will consume a whopping 61.34 percent of national income.”
The redistribution of income has reached a point in which 30.36 percent of the money Americans earn is consumed by federal spending. State governments take their percentage as well in income, sales, and other forms of taxation.
It means that Americans worked for 111 days of the year just to pay for the costs of the federal government and federal spending has reached a record 28.5 percent of GDP.
With the passage by the House of the government’s attempted takeover of the nation’s healthcare system and the up-coming cap-and-trade bill, a massive tax on energy use, there is no telling how many more government spending programs, huge redistribution schemes, Americans will be obliged to pay for.
The Obama administration swiftly embarked on an unprecedented spending spree, “bailing out” General Motors and Chrysler, in effect owning AIG, the insurance giant, and giving funds to various banks to “stimulate” loans, i.e. credit, that Americans and their business enterprises depend upon to function.
Peter Schiff, CEO of Euro-Pacific Capital, has long argued that the problems of the American economy were created by excess credit and debt, and that a massive infusion of credit and debt into the economy only exacerbates the problem. He is right.
The “stimulus” has not worked and the billions still unspent by the program should be returned to the American treasury. Taxes should be cut in order to allow Americans to save or spend their own money. Contracts with civil service and teacher’s union should be renegotiated. A vast regulatory revision to remove obstacles to economic growth should be implemented.
Meanwhile the government’s “official” figures say 10.2% of Americans are out of work, but the actual figure is estimated to be closer to 17%. Nothing is being done to facilitate hiring with tax credits and reduced taxation of small businesses, nor are the highest corporate taxes in the world being reduced to encourage domestic investment and growth.
And our present difficulties began on September 15, 2008 in what gives the appearance of a calculated attack that got Barack Obama elected and was immediately followed by all the subsequent efforts to grow the federal government ever larger to make more Americans dependent upon it. The Obama administration has increased the national debt more than all previous presidencies combined.
There is a determined effort under way to undermine the free market capitalist system that made America the greatest economic and military power in the world. Both the White House and the Democrat-controlled Congress are parties to it, but the identities of those who launched that September attack remain hidden.
Editor's Note: To read about the electronic attack, click on
Posted by Alan Caruba at 4:16 PM
Labels: bailouts, banks, Federal Reserve, Obama administration
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I knew about this months ago. My question is why the so-called media hasn't picked up on this.Thank you Alan for bringing it to light again.
Ah, the $64 question. The media is mostly composed of liberal idiots and, to my mind, the other question is why the Federal Reserve has not revealed more information about the sudden electronic withdrawal of millions or billions?
On the other hand, since the Fed does not permit an audit or reveal much other than sheer mush to Congress, it is not particularly surprising.
I understand how reluctant you may be to include links to other posts, but I speculated on exactly the same thing back in February. I came across an amazing video which I included in my post with some careful explanation.
This is the link to that post. Perhaps you might look at it first and decide whether or not to post the link.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Mesaman: What do you find extraordinary? And why don't you read the linked article?
I don't think McNews would dare open this can of worms, and of course, since they are a managed "information" source they can't say or do anything on their own anyway.
Probable candidates who were willing participants:
George Soros and Chuckie Schumer who single-handedly brought down Indy Mac bank with his 'leaked' blurb that Indy Mac was in trouble, which led to a run on the bank.
Tin hat be damned, I believe it happened and it was orchestrated by someone with full intent to destroy our economic system and likely the entire world economic system.
Why? Who knows? Making way for a "savior" to step into the fray and save the world? Create some chaos and fear to influence the coming election?
It is a puzzlement.
Alan, please Google for the term "Kanjorski meme" - you'll find it enlightening.
I'd point you first to this article concerning the events:
Thanks for posting!
oh come on allen
who moves money around better than
george soros ?
Soros is what I call the "easy" answer. The event might well have been the kind of panic that has occurred often enough on Wall Street. That said, it happened all at the same time and that suggests the panic option may not be the answer and a planned effort is.
In the end, I let people draw their own conclusions.
Meanwhile the AP assigns 11 journalists to dig deep into Palin's new book. Where are their priorities?
The AP is also cutting staff. No doubt in response to economic stress. Who needs reporters when you can just "make up" the news with virtual impunity?
Post a Comment