By Alan
Caruba
A nation
without adequate energy production is a nation in decline and that has been the
President’s agenda since the day he took office in 2009. He even announced his
war on coal during the 2008 campaign even though, at the time, it was providing
fifty percent of the electricity being utilized.
It’s
useful to know that the U.S. has huge coal reserves, enough to provide energy
for hundreds of years and reduce our debt through its export to nations such as
Japan. It increased coal-fired power generation by ten percent in 2013 while
Germany’s coal use reached the highest level since 1990. Both China and India
are increasing the use of coal. So why is coal unwelcome in the U.S.? Because
Obama says so.
On April
15, the White House held a “Solar Summit” to continue promoting subsidies for
solar panels and the Obama Energy Department has announced another $15 million
in “solar market pathways” to fund local government’s use of solar energy. Its
“Capital Solar Challenge” is directing federal agencies, military bases, and
other federally subsidized buildings to use solar power.
According
to the Institute for Energy Research, “solar energy provides two-tenths of one
percent of the total energy consumed in the United States. While the amount of
solar electricity capacity in the U.S. has increased in recent years…it still
only accounts for 0.1% of net electricity generated…the least among the
renewable sources of hydroelectric, biomass, wind and solar.”
So, in
addition to the millions lost in earlier loans to solar companies like Solyndra
that failed not long after pocketing our tax dollars, Obama is using the power
of the federal government to waste more money on this unpredictable—the Sun
only shines in the daytime and clouds can get in the way—source of energy whose
“solar farms” take up many acres just to provide a faction of what a coal-fired
or natural gas powered plant does.
This isn’t
some loony environmental theory at work although the Greens oppose all manner
of energy provision and use whether it is coal, oil or natural gas. This is a direct attack on the provision
of energy, fueled by any source, that America needs to function and meeting the
needs of its population, manufacturing, and all other uses.
The most
recent example of this is the further extension of the delay on the
construction of the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to refineries on the Gulf
Coast. That too is part of Obama’s war on energy for the nation, but it may
also have something to do with the fact that the Burlington Santa Fe Railroad
owns all of the rail lines in the U.S. connecting to western Canada. They haul
80% or more of the crude oil from Canada to the Midwest and Texas, earning a
tidy sum in the process. It is owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, a
major contributor to Democrat causes and candidates. The Keystone XL pipeline
could divert more than $2 billion a year and if its delay is not crony
capitalism, nothing is.
This is
what the Sierra Club is telling its members and supporters as of Monday, April
21: “Keystone
XL means cancer. It means wolf blood spilled. And it’s nothing short of a
climate disaster.” It is a lie from start to finish.
Keystone
has become a political issue and the announcement by the Obama State Department
that is giving agencies “additional time” to approve its construction due to
ongoing litigation before the Nebraska Supreme Court that could affect its
route brought forth protests from red-state Democrats in Congress who even
threatened to find ways to go around the President to get the project approved.
Eleven Democratic senators have written to the President to urge him to make a
final decision by the end of May. Some of them will be up for reelection in the
November midterm elections.
Even
Congress, though, seems incapable of over-ruling or overcoming Obama’s war on
the provision of energy sources. In early April, the Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) released new data showing that federal onshore oil and natural gas leases
and drilling permits are at the lowest levels in more than a decade. Leases to
companies exploring the potential of oil and natural gas reserves were down in
2013 from 1.8 million acres the year before to 1.2 million, the smallest area
since records began to be maintained in 1988!
We have a
President who gives daily evidence of his contempt both for those who voted for
him and those who did not. His anti-energy agenda impacts on the creation of
jobs, causes manufacturing to delay expansion or to go off-shore, reduces the
revenue the government needs to reduce its debts and deficits, and drives up the
cost of energy for everyone.
And he is
doing this in one of the most energy-rich nations on the planet.
Editor’s
Note:
For the
latest, updated information on energy visit http://www.energydepot.us/
© Alan
Caruba, 2014
2 comments:
Just read that according to a US Government study ethanol use causes more "pollution" than using gasoline without ethanol. Not surprised? Neither am I. The surprise is that they didn't hush it up.
If we could bottle all the GAS that Obama expels every time he speaks we'd never have to drill again...
Post a Comment